Jelmer P. Borst
ABSTRACT
In this paper we present a computational cognitive model of task interruption and resumption, focusing on the effects of the problem state bottleneck. Previous studies have shown that the disruptiveness of interruptions is for an important part determined by three factors: interruption duration, interrupting-task complexity, and moment of interruption. However, an integrated theory of these effects is still missing. Based on previous research into multitasking, we propose a first step towards such a theory in the form of a process model that attributes these effects to problem state requirements of both the interrupted and the interrupting task. Subsequently, we tested two predictions of this model in two experiments. The experiments confirmed that problem state requirements are an important predictor for the disruptiveness of interruptions. This suggests that interfaces should be designed to a) interrupt users at low-problem state moments and b) maintain the problem state for the user when interrupted.
Supplemental Material
- Adamczyk, P.D. and Bailey, B.P. If not now, when? In Proc. CHI. 2004, 271--278. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Altmann, E.M. and Trafton, J.G. Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science 26, (2002), 39--83.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Altmann, E.M. and Trafton, J.G. Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: data and a model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 6 (2007), 1079--84.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Altmann, E.M., Trafton, J.G., and Hambrick, D.Z. Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 1 (2014), 215--226.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anderson, J.R. Human symbol manipulation within an integrated cognitive architecture. Cognitive Science 29, (2005), 313--341.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anderson, J.R. How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe? Oxford University Press, New York, 2007.Google Scholar
- Bogunovich, P. and Salvucci, D. The effects of time constraints on user behavior for deferrable interruptions. Proc. CHI, (2011), 3123--3126. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Borst, J.P., Buwalda, T.A., Van Rijn, H., and Taatgen, N.A. Avoiding the Problem State Bottleneck by Strategic use of the Environment. Acta Psychologica 144, 2 (2013), 373--379.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Borst, J.P. and Taatgen, N.A. The Costs of Multitasking in Threaded Cognition. In Proc. ICCM. 2007, 133--138.Google Scholar
- Borst, J.P., Taatgen, N.A., and Van Rijn, H. The Problem State: A Cognitive Bottleneck in Multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 36, 2 (2010), 363--382.Google Scholar
- Borst, J.P., Taatgen, N.A., and Van Rijn, H. Using a Symbolic Process Model as input for Model-Based fMRI Analysis: Locating the Neural Correlates of Problem State Replacements. NeuroImage 58, 1 (2011), 137--147.Google Scholar
- Borst, J.P., Taatgen, N.A., Stocco, A., and Van Rijn, H. The Neural Correlates of Problem States: Testing fMRI Predictions of a Computational Model of Multitasking. PLoS ONE 5, 9 (2010), e12966.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cades, D.M., Davis, D.A.B., Trafton, J.G., and Monk, C.A. Does the Difficulty of an Interruption Affect our Ability to Resume? In Proc. HFES. 2007, 234--238.Google Scholar
- Cades, D.M., Werner, N., Boehm-Davis, D.A., Trafton, J.G., and Monk, C.A. Dealing with Interruptions can be Complex, but does Interruption Complexity Matter: A Mental Resources Approach to Quantifying Disruptions. In Proc. HFES. 2008, 398--402.Google Scholar
- Chisholm, C.D., Dornfeld, A.M., Nelson, D.R., and Cordell, W.H. Work interrupted: A comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. Annals of Emergency Medicine 38, 2 (2001), 146--151.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M., and Horvitz, E. Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. In Proc. INTERACT. 2001.Google Scholar
- Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., and Wilhite, S. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In Proc. CHI. 2004, 175--182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edwards, M.B. and Gronlund, S.D. Task Interruption and its Effects on Memory. Memory 6, 6 (1998), 665--687.Google Scholar
- Eyrolle, H. and Cellier, J.-M. The effects of interruptions in work activity: field and laboratory results. Applied Ergonomics 31, 5 (2000), 537--543.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gillie, T. and Broadbent, D.E. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychological Research 50, (1989), 243--250.Google ScholarCross Ref
- González, V. and Mark, G. Constant, constant, multitasking craziness: managing multiple working spheres. In Proc. CHI. 2004, 113--120. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gould, S., Brumby, D., and Cox, A.L. What does it mean for an interruption to be relevant? An investigation of relevance as a memory effect. In Proc. HFES. 2013, 149--153.Google Scholar
- Hodgetts, H.M. and Jones, D.M. Interruption of the Tower of London task: support for a goal-activation approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135, 1 (2006), 103--15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Iqbal, S.T., Adamczyk, P., Zheng, X., and Bailey, B.P. Towards an index of opportunity: understanding changes in mental workload during task execution. In Proc. SIGCHI. 2005, 311--320. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Iqbal, S.T. and Bailey, B.P. Investigating the effectiveness of mental workload as a predictor of opportune moments for interruption. In Proc. CHI. 2005, 1489--1492. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Iqbal, S.T. and Bailey, B.P. Leveraging characteristics of task structure to predict the cost of interruption. In Proc. CHI. 2006, pp. 741--750. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Iqbal, S.T. and Horvitz, E. Disruption and recovery of computing tasks. In Proc. CHI. 2007, 677--686. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jin, J. and Dabbish, L.A. Self-interruption on the computer: A Typology of Discretionary Task Interleaving. In Proc. CHI. 2009, 1799--1808. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katidioti, I., Borst, J.P., and Taatgen, N.A. What Happens When We Switch Tasks: Pupil dilation in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, (in press).Google Scholar
- Katidioti, I. and Taatgen, N.A. Choice in Multitasking: How Delays in the Primary Task Turn a Rational Into an Irrational Multitasker. Human Factors 56, 4 (2014), pp. 728--736.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark, G., González, V., and Harris, J. No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work. In Proc. CHI. 2005, 321--330. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McFarlane, D. Comparison of Four Primary Methods for Coordinating the Interruption of People in HumanComputer Interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 17, 1 (2002), 63--139. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McFarlane, D.C. and Latorella, K.A. The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design. Human-Computer Interaction 17, 1 (2002), pp. 1--61. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Monk, C.A., Boehm-Davis, D.A., and Trafton, J.G. Recovering From Interruptions: Implications for Driver Distraction Research. Human Factors 46, 4 (2004), 650--663.Google Scholar
- Monk, C.A., Trafton, J.G., and Boehm-Davis, D.A. The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14, 4 (2008), pp. 299--313.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Monsell, S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 3 (2003), 134--140.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nijboer, M., Borst, J.P., Van Rijn, H., and Taatgen, N.A. Single-task fMRI overlap predicts concurrent multitasking interference. NeuroImage 100, (2014), 60--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oberauer, K. Design for a working memory. In B.H. Ross, ed., Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Academic Press, 2009, 45--100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Renaud, K. Expediting Rapid Recovery from Interruptions by Providing a Visualisation of Application Activity. In Proc. OZCHI. 2000, 348--355.Google Scholar
- Van Rijn, H., Dalenberg, J.R., Borst, J.P., and Sprenger, S.A. Pupil Dilation Co-Varies with Memory Strength of Individual Traces in a Delayed Response PairedAssociate Task. PLoS ONE 7, 12 (2012), e51134.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rosen, L.D., Mark Carrier, L., and Cheever, N.A. Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (2013), 948--958. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Salvucci, D.D. and Bogunovich, P. Multitasking and monotasking: the effects of mental workload on deferred task interruptions. In Proc. CHI. ACM Press, 2010, 85--88. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Salvucci, D.D., Monk, C.A., and Trafton, J.G. A Process-Model Account of Task Interruption and Resumption: When Does Encoding of the Problem State Occur? In Proc. HFES. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2009, pp. 799--803.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Salvucci, D.D. and Taatgen, N.A. The multitasking mind. Oxford University Press, New York, 2011.Google Scholar
- Trafton, J.G., Altmann, E.M., Brock, D.P., and Mintz, F.E. Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58, 5 (2003), 583--603. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zijlstra, F.R.H., Roe, R.A., Leonora, A.B., and Krediet, I. Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 72, (1999), pp. 163--185.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- What Makes Interruptions Disruptive?: A Process-Model Account of the Effects of the Problem State Bottleneck on Task Interruption and Resumption
Recommendations
A diary study of task switching and interruptions
CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe report on a diary study of the activities of information workers aimed at characterizing how people interleave multiple tasks amidst interruptions. The week-long study revealed the type and complexity of activities performed, the nature of the ...
Investigating interruptions in the context of computerised cognitive testing for older adults
CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsInterruptions in the home pose a threat to the validity of self-administered computerised cognitive testing. We report the findings of a laboratory experiment investigating the effects of increased interruption workload demand on older adults' ...
Eliciting Spoken Interruptions to Inform Proactive Speech Agent Design
CUI '21: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User InterfacesCurrent speech agent interactions are typically user-initiated, limiting the interactions they can deliver. Future functionality will require agents to be proactive, sometimes interrupting users. Little is known about how these spoken interruptions ...
Comments