skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702162acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Demand in My Pocket: Mobile Devices and the Data Connectivity Marshalled in Support of Everyday Practice

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper empirically explores the role that mobile devices have come to play in everyday practice, and how this links to demand for network connectivity and online services. After a preliminary device-logging period, thirteen participants were interviewed about how they use their iPhones or iPads. Our findings build a picture of how, through use of such devices, a variety of daily practices have come to depend upon a working data connection, which sometimes surges, but is at least always a trickle. This aims to inform the sustainable design of applications, services and infrastructures for smartphones and tablets. By focusing our analysis in this way, we highlight a little-explored challenge for sustainable HCI and discuss ideas for (re)designing around the principle of 'light-weight' data 'needs'.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p2729.mp4

mp4

138.9 MB

References

  1. Athukorala, K., Lagerspetz, E., von Kügelgen, M., Jylhä, A., Oliner, A., Tarkoma, S., and Jacucci, G. 2014. How carat affects user behavior: implications for mobile battery awareness applications. Proc. CHI. 1029--1038. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Böhmer, M., Hecht, B., Schöning, J., Krüger, A., & Bauer, G. 2011. Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: a large scale study on mobile application usage. Proc. CHI. 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Clear, A., Morley, J., Hazas, M., Friday, A., and Bates, O. 2013. Understanding Thermal Comfort: New Directions for Ubicomp. Proc. UbiComp, 113--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Corcoran, P., & Andrae, A. 2013. Emerging trends in electricity consumption for consumer ICT. http://vmserver14.nuigalway.ie/xmlui/handle/10379/356 3. Accessed September 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Coroama, V. and Hilty, L. 2014. Assessing Internet energy intensity: A review of methods and results, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 45, 63--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Coroama, V., Schien, D., Preist, C., and Hilty, L. 2014. The Energy Intensity of the Internet: Home and Access Networks. In ICT Innovations for Sustainability, Aebischer and Hilty (eds.), Springer. 137--155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaver, W.W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., et al. 2004. The Drift Table: Designing for Ludic Engagement. CHI EA '04. 885--900. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hallnäs, L. and Redström, J. 2001. Slow Technology -- Designing for Reflection. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 5, 3. 201--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Harmon, E. and Mazmanian, M. 2013. Stories of the smartphone in everyday discourse: Conflict, tension and instability. Proc. CHI. 1051--1060. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Höök, K., Ståhl, A., Sundström, P., and Laaksolaahti, J. 2008. Interactional Empowerment. Proc. CHI. 647--656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kawsar, F. and Brush, A.J. 2013. Home computing unplugged: Why, where and when people use different connected devices at home. Proc. UbiComp. 627--636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lee, U., Lee, J., Ko, M., et al. 2014. Hooked on smartphones: an exploratory study on smartphone overuse among college students. Proc. CHI. 2327--2336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Leshed, G. and Sengers, P. 2011. I lie to myself about the freedom in my own schedule: productivity tools and the experiences of busyness. Proc. CHI. 905--914. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Odom, W.T., Sellen, A.J., Banks, R., et al. 2014. Designing for Slowness, Anticipation and Re-visitation: A Long Term Field Study of the Photobox. Pro. CHI. 1961--1970. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., Raita, E. 2012. Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 16. 105--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pierce, J. and Paulos, E. 2014. Counterfunctional Things: Exploring Possibilities in Designing Digital Limitations. Proc. DIS. 375--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pierce, J. 2014. Undesigning interaction. Interactions 21, 4. 36--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Preist, C. and Shabajee, P. 2010. Energy Use in the Media Cloud: Behaviour Change, or Technofix? Proc. CloudCom. 581--586. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Rahmati, A., Tossell, C., Shepard, C., Kortum, P., and Zhong, L. 2012. Exploring iPhone usage: the influence of socioeconomic differences on smartphone adoption, usage and usability. Proc MobileHCI. 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Røpke, I., and Christensen, T. H. 2012. Energy impacts of ICT -- insights from an everyday life perspective. Telematics and Informatics 29, 4. 348--361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sandvine. 1h 2014. Global internet phenomenon report. Sandvine Incorporated ULC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Schien, D., Shabajee, P., Yearworth, M. and Preist, C. 2013. Modeling and assessing variability in energy consumption during the use stage of online multimedia services. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17, 6. 800--813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Schien, D. and Preist, C. 2014. A review of top-down models of internet network energy intensity. ICT4S. 87--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Schien, D., Coroama, V. C., Hilty, L. M. and Preist, C. 2015. The energy intensity of the Internet: edge and core networks. In: ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Springer. 157--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., and Kaye, J. 2005. Reflective Design. Pro. CC. 49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sengers, P. 2011. What I learned on Change Islands: reflections on IT and pace of life. Interactions 18, 2. 40--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Strengers, Y. 2011. Designing Eco-feedback Systems for Everyday Life. Proc. CHI. 2135--2144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tossell, C., Kortum, P., Rahmati, A., Shepard, C., & Zhong, L. 2012. Characterizing web use on smartphones. Proc. CHI. 2769--2778. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Turkle, S. 2011. Alone Together: Why do we expect more from technology and less from each other? New York: Basic Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Weber, C. L., Koomey, J. G. and Matthews, H. S. 2010. The energy and climate change implications of different music delivery methods. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14, 5. 754--769.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Willum, O., 2008. Residential ICT related energy consumption which is not registered at the electric meters in the residences. Willum Consult and DTU Management Engineering. Copenhagen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Demand in My Pocket: Mobile Devices and the Data Connectivity Marshalled in Support of Everyday Practice

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader