skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702205acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding and Supporting Fathers and Fatherhood on Social Media Sites

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Fathers are taking on more childcare and household responsibilities than they used to and many non-profit and government organizations have pushed for changes in policies to support fathers. Despite this effort, little research has explored how fathers go online related to their roles as fathers. Drawing on an interview study with 37 fathers, we find that they use social media to document and archive fatherhood, learn how to be a father, and access social support. They also go online to support diverse family needs, such as single fathers' use of Reddit instead of Facebook, fathers raised by single mothers' search for role models online, and stay-at-home fathers' use of father blogs. However, fathers are constrained by privacy concerns and perceptions of judgment relating to sharing content online about their children. Drawing on theories of fatherhood, we present theoretical and design ideas for designing online spaces to better support fathers and fatherhood. We conclude with a call for a research agenda to support fathers online.

References

  1. Abernethy, V.D. Social network and response to the maternal role. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, (1973), 86--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ammari, T., Schoenebeck, S.Y., and Morris, M.R. Accessing Social Support and Overcoming Judgment on Social Media among Parents of Children with Special Needs. In Proc. ICWSM, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Azar, S.T., Nix, R.L., and Makin-Byrd, K.N. Parenting schemas and the process of change. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 31, 1 (2005), 45--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. BabyCenter. babycenter.com/help-about-company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Balaam, M., Robertson, J., Say, R., et al. Motherhood and HCI. CHI Workshop, (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bandura, A. Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press, New York, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartholomew, M.K., Schoppe-Sullivan, S.J., Glassman, M., Kamp Dush, C.M., and Sullivan, J.M. New Parents' Facebook Use at the Transition to Parenthood. Family Relations 61, 3 (2012), 455--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Biddle, B.J. Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. Academic Press, New York, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Budig, M.J. and England, P. The Wage Penalty for Motherhood. American Sociological Review 66, 2 (2001), 204--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cabrera, N. and Peters, H.E. Public Policies and Father Involvement. Marr. & Fam. Rev. 29, 4 (2000), 295--314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabrera, N., Tamis-LeMonda, C.S., Bradley, R.H., Hofferth, S., & Lamb, M.E. Fatherhood in the TwentyFirst Century. Child Dev. 71, 1 (2000), 127--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Cochran, M.M. and Brassard, J.A. Child development and personal social networks. Child development, (1979), 601--616.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Eriksson, H. and Salzmann-Erikson, M. Supporting a caring fatherhood in cyberspace-an analysis of communication about caring within an online forum for fathers. Scand. J. of Caring Science 27, 1 (2013), 63--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Fatherhood Institute. www.fatherhoodinstitute.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations 7, 2 (1954), 117--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher, R. and StGeorge, J. Heading Into Fatherhood Nervously: Support for Fathering From Online Dads. Qualitative Health Research 21, 8 (2011), 1101--1114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Gibson, L. and Hanson, V.L. Digital motherhood: How Does Technology Help New Mothers? In Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gregory, A. and Milner, S. What is "New" about Fatherhood?: The Social Construction of Fatherhood in France and the UK. Men & Masc. 14,5 (2011), 588--606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hays, S. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. Yale University Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Himsel, A.J. and Goldberg, W.A. Social Comparisons and Satisfaction with the Division of Housework Implications for Men's and Women's Role Strain. Journal of Family Issues 24, 7 (2003), 843--866.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Hudson, D.B., Campbell-Grossman, C., Fleck, M.O., Elek, S.M., and Shipman, A. Effects of the New Fathers Network on first-time fathers' parenting self-efficacy and parenting satisfaction during the transition to parenthood. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing 26, 4 (2003), 217--229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Johansson, T. and Hammarén, N. 'Imagine, just 16 years old and already a dad!' The construction of young fatherhood on the Internet. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, (2012), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kazakos, K., Bales, E., Neustaedter, C., Yarosh, S., Kaye, J. "Jofish," and Kirk, D. Exploring the Diversity of Families: Designing Technologies for the Contemporary Family Life. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts (2013), 3255--3258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kim Parker and Wendy Wang. Modern Parenthood. Pew Research, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kittur, A., Peters, A.M., Diriye, A., and Bove, M. Standing on the Schemas of Giants: Socially Augmented Information Foraging. In Proc. CSCW '14, ACM (2014), 999--1010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Lamb, M.E. The History of Research on Father Involvement. Marr. & Fam. Rev. 29, 2-3 (2000), 23--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lamb, M.E., Pleck, J.H., Charnov, E.L., and Levine, J.A. Paternal behavior in humans. American zoologist, (1985), 883--894.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lamb, M., Pleck, J.H., Charnov, E.L., and Levine, J.A. A biosocial perspective on paternal behavior and involvement. 111--142. In Parenting across the life span: Biosocial dimensions. 1987, 111--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. LaRossa, R. The Modernization of Fatherhood: A Social and Political History. Univ. of Chicago Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Marketing to Moms Coalition. State of the American Mom 2012. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Mickelson, K.D. Seeking social support: parents in electronic support groups. In S. Kiesler, ed., Culture of the Internet. LEA, 1997, 157--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Morris, M.R. Social Networking Site Use by Mothers of Young Children. In Proc. of CSCW '14, ACM, (2014), 1272--1282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. National Fatherhood Initiative. www.fatherhood.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Nicholas, D.B., Chahauver, A., Brownstone, D., Hetherington, R., McNeill, T., and Bouffet, E. Evaluation of an online peer support network for fathers of a child with a brain tumor. Social Work in Health Care 51, 3 (2012), 232--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Rehel, E.M. When Dad Stays Home Too Paternity Leave, Gender, and Parenting. Gender & Society, (2013), 0891243213503900.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryan, C.L. and Siebens, J. Educational attainment in the USA: 2009. US Census Bureau, (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Salzmann-Erikson, M. and Eriksson, H. Fathers sharing about early parental support in health-care - virtual discussions on an Internet forum. Health & Social Care in the Community 21, 4 (2013), 381--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Schank, R.C. and Abelson, R.P. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry Into Human Knowledge Structures. Psychology Press, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Schoenebeck, S.Y. The Secret Life of Online Moms: Anonymity and Disinhibition on YouBeMom.com. In Proc. ICWSM 2013, (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Seligson, H. Fathers Seek Advertising That Does Not Ridicule. The New York Times, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/24/business/fathersseek-advertising-that-does-not-ridicule.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Sivek, S.C. "We Need a Showing of All Hands" Technological Utopianism in MAKE Magazine. Journal of Communication Inquiry 35, 3 (2011), 187--209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. StGeorge, J.M. and Fletcher, R.J. Fathers Online: Learning About Fatherhood Through the Internet. The Journal of Perinatal Education 20, 3 (2011), 154--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Tuffin, K., Rouch, G., and Frewin, K. Constructing adolescent fatherhood: responsibilities and intergenerational repair. Culture, health & sexuality 12, 5 (2010), 485--498.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. White, N.R. About Fathers: Masculinity and the Social Construction of Fatherhood. Journal of Sociology 30, 2 (1994), 119--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Zhao, S. Parental education and children's online health information seeking: Beyond the digital divide debate. Social Science & Medicine 69, 10 (2009), 1501--1505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. We're Dads, Huggies. Not Dummies. Change.org. www.change.org/p/we-re-dads-huggies-not-dummieGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Understanding and Supporting Fathers and Fatherhood on Social Media Sites

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader