skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702214acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User-Defined Game Input for Smart Glasses in Public Space

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smart glasses, such as Google Glass, provide always-available displays not offered by console and mobile gaming devices, and could potentially offer a pervasive gaming experience. However, research on input for games on smart glasses has been constrained by the available sensors to date. To help inform design directions, this paper explores user-defined game input for smart glasses beyond the capabilities of current sensors, and focuses on the interaction in public settings. We conducted a user-defined input study with 24 participants, each performing 17 common game control tasks using 3 classes of interaction and 2 form factors of smart glasses, for a total of 2448 trials. Results show that users significantly preferred non-touch and non-handheld interaction over using handheld input devices, such as in-air gestures. Also, for touch input without handheld devices, users preferred interacting with their palms over wearable devices (51% vs 20%). In addition, users preferred interactions that are less noticeable due to concerns with social acceptance, and preferred in-air gestures in front of the torso rather than in front of the face (63% vs 37%).

References

  1. Aigner, R., Wigdor, D., Benko, H., Haller, M., Lindbauer, D., Ion, A., Zhao, S., and Koh, J. Understanding mid-air hand gestures: A study of human preferences in usage of gesture types for hci. Microsoft Research TechReport MSR-TR-2012--111 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. App Annie. http://www.appannie.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baba, T., Ushiama, T., Tsuruno, R., and Tomimatsu, K. Video game that uses skin contact as controller input. SIGGRAPH '07, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Biskupski, A., Fender, A. R., Feuchtner, T. M., Karsten, M., and Willaredt, J. D. Drunken ed: A balance game for public large screen displays. CHI EA '14, 289--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Christian, S., Alves, J., Ferreira, A., Jesus, D., Freitas, R., and Vieira, N. Volcano salvation: Interaction through gesture and head tracking. CHI EA '14, 297--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Colacó, A., Kirmani, A., Yang, H. S., Gong, N.-W., Schmandt, C., and Goyal, V. K. Mime: Compact, low power 3d gesture sensing for interaction with head mounted displays. UIST '13, 227--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Epps, J., Lichman, S., and Wu, M. A study of hand shape use in tabletop gesture interaction. CHI EA '06, 748--753. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Epson BT-100 Specs. http://www.epson.com.au/products/ ProjectorAccessories/Moverio_BT-100_specs.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Essential Facts About The Computer And Video Game Industry. http: //www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/esa_ef_2014.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Findlater, L., Lee, B., and Wobbrock, J. Beyond qwerty: Augmenting touch screen keyboards with multi-touch gestures for non-alphanumeric input. CHI '12, pp. 2679--2682. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. GameStop. http://www.gamestop.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Google Glass wiki. http: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Glass#Features.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Grijincu, D., Nacenta, M. A., and Kristensson, P. O. User-defined interface gestures: Dataset and analysis. ITS '14, 25--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gustafson, S., Holz, C., and Baudisch, P. Imaginary phone: Learning imaginary interfaces by transferring spatial memory from a familiar device. UIST '11, 283--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Harada, S., Wobbrock, J. O., and Landay, J. A. Voice games: Investigation into the use of non-speech voice input for making computer games more accessible. INTERACT'11, pp. 11--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Harrison, C., Benko, H., and Wilson, A. D. Omnitouch: Wearable multitouch interaction everywhere. UIST '11, 441--450. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Harrison, C., Tan, D., and Morris, D. Skinput: Appropriating the body as an input surface. CHI '10, 453--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hsu, C.-Y., Tung, Y.-C., Wang, H.-Y., Chyou, S., Lin, J.-W., and Chen, M. Y. Glass shooter: Exploring first-person shooter game control with google glass. ICMI '14, 70--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jing, L., Cheng, Z., Zhou, Y., Wang, J., and Huang, T. Magic ring: A self-contained gesture input device on finger. MUM '13, 39:1--39:4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jurgelionis, A., Nap, H. H., Gajadhar, B. J., Bellotti, F., Wang, A. I., and Berta, R. Player experience and technical performance prospects for distributed 3d gaming in private and public settings. Comput. Entertain., 16:1--16:19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Cohen's kappa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohen's_kappa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Karam, M., et al. A taxonomy of gestures in human computer interactions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim, D., Hilliges, O., Izadi, S., Butler, A. D., Chen, J., Oikonomidis, I., and Olivier, P. Digits: Freehand 3d interactions anywhere using a wrist-worn gloveless sensor. UIST '12, 167--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Liang, H.-N., Williams, C., Semegen, M., Stuerzlinger, W., and Irani, P. User-defined surface+motion gestures for 3d manipulation of objects at a distance through a mobile device. APCHI '12, 299--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Google Glass Mini Games. https://developers. google.com/glass/samples/mini-games.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Montero, C. S., Alexander, J., Marshall, M. T., and Subramanian, S. Would you do that?: Understanding social acceptance of gestural interfaces. MobileHCI '10, 275--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Morris, M. R. Web on the wall: Insights from a multimodal interaction elicitation study. ITS '12, 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nacke, L. E., Kalyn, M., Lough, C., and Mandryk, R. L. Biofeedback game design: Using direct and indirect physiological control to enhance game interaction. CHI '11, 103--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Nielsen, M., Störring, M., Moeslund, T. B., and Granum, E. A procedure for developing intuitive and ergonomic gesture interfaces for hci. In Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 2004, 409--420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Piumsomboon, T., Clark, A., Billinghurst, M., and Cockburn, A. User-defined gestures for augmented reality. CHI'13, 955--960. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pyryeskin, D., Hancock, M., and Hoey, J. Comparing elicited gestures to designer-created gestures for selection above a multitouch surface. ITS '12, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Reis, S. Expanding the magic circle in pervasive casual play. ICEC'12, 486--489. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Serrano, M., Ens, B. M., and Irani, P. P. Exploring the use of hand-to-face input for interacting with head-worn displays. CHI '14, 3181--3190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Sporka, A. J., Kurniawan, S. H., Mahmud, M., and Slavík, P. Non-speech input and speech recognition for real-time control of computer games. Assets '06, 213--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Steam. http://store.steampowered.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Top 90 Casual Games List. http://ppt.cc/hO2j, Analyzed at 2014-08--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. VGChartz. http://www.vgchartz.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Vickers, S., Istance, H., and Hyrskykari, A. Performing locomotion tasks in immersive computer games with an adapted eye-tracking interface. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 5, 1 (Sept. 2013), 2:1--2:33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Williamson, J. R., Brewster, S., and Vennelakanti, R. Mo!games: Evaluating mobile gestures in the wild. ICMI '13, 173--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Wobbrock, J. O., Aung, H. H., Rothrock, B., and Myers, B. A. Maximizing the guessability of symbolic input. CHI EA '05, 1869--1872. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Wobbrock, J. O., Morris, M. R., and Wilson, A. D. User-defined gestures for surface computing. CHI '09, pp. 1083--1092. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. User-Defined Game Input for Smart Glasses in Public Space

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2015
        4290 pages
        ISBN:9781450331456
        DOI:10.1145/2702123

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 April 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader