skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702410acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"Is it Weird to Still Be a Virgin": Anonymous, Locally Targeted Questions on Facebook Confession Boards

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

People have long sought answers to questions online, typically using either anonymous or pseudonymous forums or social network platforms that primarily use real names. Systems that allow anonymous communication afford freedom to explore identity and discuss taboo topics, but can result in negative disinhibited behavior such as cyberbullying. Identifiable communication systems allows one to reach a known audience and avoid negative disinhibition, but can constrain behavior with concerns about privacy and reputation. One persistent design issue is understanding how to leverage the benefits of anonymity without suffering its drawbacks. This paper presents a case study analysis of question asking on Facebook confession boards (FCBs), a tool popular on some college campuses. FCBs present a unique configuration in which members of an offline community (e.g., a university) anonymously submit content to a moderator who posts it to a Facebook page where others in the community can view it and respond. Response is via identifiable Facebook comments and likes. Our results show users asking about taboo and stigmatized topics with local others, and receiving relevant responses with little cyberbullying or negativity.

References

  1. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. and Fitzsimons, G. M. Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. J. of Social Issues, 58, 1 (2002), 33--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Baxter, L. A. and Wilmot, W. W. Taboo topics in close relationships. J. of Social and Personal Relationships, 2,3. (1985), pp. 253--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bounds, A. 'Confessions': anonymous Facebook pages gain popularity among Boulder high school, college students. Retrieved from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/27/confessions -facebook-page-cu-boulder-students_n_2962252.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chicago, C. "Yik Yak" app disabled in Chicago after schools warn of cyberbullying danger. Retrieved from: http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2014/03/06/schools-warnof-cyberbullying-danger-from-new-yik-yak-app/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. JCMC, 12, 2 (2007), 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ellison, N. B. and boyd, d. m. Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford Press, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher, D., Smith, M. and Welser, H. T. You are who you talk to: detecting roles in Usenet newsgroups. In Proc. HICSS (2006), 59b. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books, New York, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Goffman, E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. , 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodwin, R. and Lee, I. Taboo Topics among Chinese and English Friends A Cross-Cultural Comparison. J. of cross-cultural psychology, 25, 3 (1994), pp. 325--338.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gray, R., Ellison, N., Lampe, C. and Vitak, J. Who wants to know? question-asking and answering practices among Facebook users. In Proc. CSCW (2013), 12131224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hargittai, E. and Hsieh, Y. P. Predictors and consequences of differentiated practices and social network sites. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 4 (2010), pp. 515--536.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Nonmedical Use of Adderall® among Full-Time College Students. Retrieved from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/2k9/adderall/adderall.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang, J. J., Chang, S. C. and Hu, S. Y. Searching for answers via social networks. In Proc. IEEE CCNC (2008), 289--293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Johnson, S. E., Richeson, J. and Finkel, E. J. Middle class and marginal? socioeconomic status, stigma, and self-regulation at an elite university. J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2011), 838--852.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Joinson, A. N. Disinhibition and the Internet. In J. Gackenbach, ed. Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Le Bon, G. The crowd: A study of the popular mind. MacMillan, London, UK, 1897.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Litt, E. Knock, Knock. Who's There? The Imagined Audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 3 (2012), 330--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mamykina, L., Manoim, B., Mittal, M., Hripcsak, G. and Hartmann, B. Design lessons from the fastest q&a site in the west. In Proc. CHI (2011), pp. 2857--2866. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mohamed, A. Ontario school board wants Facebook to remove anonymous "confessions" page. Retrieved from: https://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/dailybrew/ontarioschool-board-wants-facebook-remove-anonymousconfessions-200348526.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Morris, M. R., Teevan, J. and Panovich, K. What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior. In Proc. CHI (2010), 1739--1748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nilizadeh, S., Alam, N., Husted, N. and Kapadia, A. Pythia: a privacy aware, peer-to-peer network for social search. In Proc. WPES (2011), 43--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. O'Sullivan, P. B. and Flanagin, A. J. Reconceptualizing "flaming" and other problematic messages. New Media Soc, 5, 1 (2003), 69--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., Hecht, B., Morris, M. R., Teevan, J. and Gergle, D. To search or to ask: the routing of information needs between traditional search engines and social networks. In Proc. CSCW (2014), pp. 16--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Peesapati, S. T., Schultz, J., Lepage, M., Jeong, S. and Cosley, D. Pensieve: supporting everyday reminiscence. In Proc. CHI (2010), 2027--2036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Priedhorsky, R., Masli, M. and Terveen, L. Eliciting and focusing geographic volunteer work. In Proc. CSCW (2010), 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Pullen, M. Law enforcement warns about dangers of Yik Yak app. Retrieved from: http://www.wjtv.com/story/24958821/law-enforcementwarns-about-dangers-of-yik-yak-appGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Stuart, C., Dabbish, L., Kiesler, S., Kinnaird, P. and Kang, R. Social transparency in networked information exchange: a theoretical framework. In Proc. CSCW (2012), 451--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Suler, J. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 3 (2004), 321--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Turkle, S. Life on the screen : identity in the age of the Internet. Simon & Schuster, New York, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wang, G., Gill, K., Mohanlal, M., Zheng, H. and Zhao, B. Y. Wisdom in the social crowd: an analysis of quora. In Proc. WWW, (2013) pp. 1341--1352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Whittaker, E. and Kowalski, R. Cyberbullying via social media. Journal of School Violence(in press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., Hill, W. and Cherny, L. The dynamics of mass interaction. In Proc. CSCW (1998), 257--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Woo, J. The right not to be identified: privacy and anonymity in the interactive media environment. New Media Soc, 8, 7 (2006), pp. 949--967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Zimmer, M. "But the data is already public": on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 4 (2010), 313--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. "Is it Weird to Still Be a Virgin": Anonymous, Locally Targeted Questions on Facebook Confession Boards

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader