skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702554acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

News Feed: What's in it for Me?

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over a billion people use social networking sites like Facebook to maintain awareness of their friends. Facebook's News Feed is the primary mechanism by which people are shown updates about their friends' daily activities on the site in the form of an algorithmically curated list of stories. This paper examines how people browse the News Feed, their perceptions and satisfaction while using it, and the interactions they make with their personal social network. We conducted a qualitative study involving think-aloud semi-structured interviews as the participants casually browsed their own feeds. We observed a wide variation in the use of the News Feed ranging from careful consideration of social conventions, judgment of people, and annoyance and frustration towards certain friends. Our findings suggest that people do not deliberately curate their own News Feed either due to lack of awareness or perceived social repercussions.

References

  1. Back, M. Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idealization. In Psychology Science. (2010), 372--374Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., and Adamic, L. The Role of Social Networks in Information Diffusion. In Proc. WWW 2012, ACM Press (2012), 519--528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barkhuus, L., and Tashiro, J. Student Socialization in the Age of Facebook. In Proc. CHI2010, ACM Press (2010), 133--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. Feed Me: Motivating Newcomer Contribution in Social Network Sites. In Proc. CHI2009, ACM Press (2009), 945--954. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Click-baiting http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2014/08/news-feed-fyiclick-baiting/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman, J. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, (1988), S95--S120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Company Info, Facebook Newsroom http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellison, B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12: 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Facebook Wants Your News Feed to Reflect What's Happening Right Nowhttps://time.com/3399167/facebook-news-feedchange/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2011a). {Closeness of Facebook friends}. Unpublished raw data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Glaser, B., Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine De Gruyter, NY, USA, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, Garden City, NY, USA, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Granovetter, M. The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory (1983), 201--233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hart, J., Ridley, C., Taher, F., Sas, C., and Dix, A. Exploring the Facebook Experience: A New Approach to Usability. In Proc. NordiCHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 471--474. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. I Liked Everything I Saw On Facebook http://www.wired.com/2014/08/i-liked-everything-isaw-on-facebook-for-two-days-heres-what-it-did-to-me/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, M., Egelman, S., and Bellovin, S.M. Facebook and Privacy it's Complicated. In Proc. SOUPS 2012, ACM Press (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Joinson, A.N. Looking at, Looking up or Keeping up with People?: Motives and Uses of Facebook. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1027--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kairam, S., Brzozowski, M., Huffaker, D., and Chi, E. Talking in Circles: Selective Sharing in Google+. In Proc. CHI2012, ACM Press (2012), 1065--1074. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lampe, C., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C. A Face(book) in the Crowd: Social Searching vs. Social Browsing. In Proc. CSCW2006, ACM Press (2006), 167--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lampe, C., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C. Changes in Use and Perception of Facebook. In Proc.CSCW2008, ACM Press (2008), 721--730. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lewis, C. and Rieman, J. Task-Centered User Interface Design. Chapter 5: Testing the Design With Users. http://hcibib.org/tcuid/chap-5.html#5-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mehdizadeh, S., Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and Self-Esteem on Facebook. In Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. (2010), 357--364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Michael Brown's shooting in Ferguson lost on social media http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/michael-brown-sshooting-in-ferguson-lost-on-social-media-1.2740014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Net Neutrality, Algorithmic Filtering and Fergusonhttps://medium.com/message/ferguson-is-alsoa-net-neutrality-issue-6d2f3db51eb0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Pempek, T.A., Yermolayeva, Y.A., and Calvert, S.L. College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30, Elsevier (2009), 227--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T., and Olmstead, K. Understanding the Participatory News Consumer. Research for Pew Internet, (2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Skeels, M. and Grudin, J. When Social Networks Cross Boundaries: A Case Study of Workplace Use of Facebook and LinkedIn. In Proc. GROUP2009. ACM Press (2009), 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sun, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. Gesundheit! Modeling Contagion through Facebook News Feed. In Proc. ICWSM 2009, AAAI Press (2009), 146--153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. The Ice Bucket Challenge on Facebook http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2014/08/the-ice-bucketchallenge-on-facebook/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Thompson, C. Brave New World of Digital Intimacy. New York Times Magazine. (September 5, 2008)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Vitak, J., Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. The Ties That Bond: Re-Examining the Relationship between Facebook Use and Bonding Social Capital. HICSS (2011) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. News Feed: What's in it for Me?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader