ABSTRACT
This paper responds to a 2014 paper by Liu et al seeking a quantifiable thematic core to CHI. As an alternative, I argue that CHI should strategically avoid the search for such a core, instead seeking its identity as a mode of responding and contributing to other disciplines.
- Barry, A., Born, G., and G. Weszkalnys. Logics of Interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society, 37(2008), 2049.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Blackwell, A.F., Eckert, C.M., Bucciarelli, L.L. and Earl, C.F. Witnesses to design: A phenomenology of comparative design. Design Issues 25(2009), 36--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Blackwell, A.F., Wilson, L., Boulton, C. and Knell, J. Creating value across boundaries: Maximising the return from interdisciplinary innovation. NESTA Research Report CVAB/48, 2010.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford University Press, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cox, G. Cox Review of Creativity in Business: building on the UK's strengths, 2005. HM Treasury.Google Scholar
- Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for design. In Proc. CHI 2006, pp. 541--550. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fincher, S. & Petre, M. Computer science education research. London ; New York: Taylor & Francis, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Galison, P. Image & logic: A material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, 1994.Google Scholar
- HM Treasury. Science and innovation investment framework 2004--2014Google Scholar
- Kim, S. Interdisciplinary Cooperation, in Laurel, B., ed., The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley, 1990, pp. 31--44.Google Scholar
- Kirk, K. and Cotton, C. The Cambridge Phenomenon: 50 Years of Innovation and Enterprise. Third Millennium, 2012.Google Scholar
- Liu, Y. Goncalves, J., Ferreira, D. Xiao, B. Hosio, S. and Kostakos, V. CHI 1994--2013: mapping two decades of intellectual progress through co-word analysis. In Proc. CHI 2014, pp. 3553--3562. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lloyd, G.E.R. Disciplines in the Making: CrossCultural perspectives on elites, learning and innovation. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- National Academies (U.S.). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. National Academies Press,Google Scholar
- Schön, D. The Reflective Practitioner, How Professionals Think In Action, Basic Books, 1983Google Scholar
- Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J. Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social Studies of Science 19, 3 (1989), 387--420.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stokes, D.E. Pasteur's Quadrant -- Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Press, 1997Google Scholar
- Stolterman, E. and Wiberg, M. (2010). Concept-driven interaction design research. Human-Computer Interaction 25(2), 95--118.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- HCI as an Inter-Discipline
Recommendations
Research Collaborations in Multidisciplinary Institutions: a Case Study of iSchools
WWW '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide WebAlthough closely related, multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity are different. The former indicates the co-existence of multiple disciplines while the latter is more about the integration among various areas. As collaboration between researchers ...
Internationalisation, innovation, and academic–corporate co-publications
AbstractResearch policy often asks for international academic collaboration or collaborations between universities and other actors in society. To improve the understanding of such collaborations, a systematic analysis of academic–corporate co-...
Exploring the interdisciplinary evolution of a discipline: the case of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
This study explores interdisciplinarity evolution of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (BMB) over a one-hundred-year period on several fronts, namely: change in interdisciplinarity, identification of core disciplines, disciplinary emergence, and ...
Comments