skip to main content
10.1145/2736277.2741127acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Scalable Methods for Adaptively Seeding a Social Network

Published:18 May 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, social networking platforms have developed into extraordinary channels for spreading and consuming information. Along with the rise of such infrastructure, there is continuous progress on techniques for spreading information effectively through influential users. In many applications, one is restricted to select influencers from a set of users who engaged with the topic being promoted, and due to the structure of social networks, these users often rank low in terms of their influence potential. An alternative approach one can consider is an adaptive method which selects users in a manner which targets their influential neighbors. The advantage of such an approach is that it leverages the friendship paradox in social networks: while users are often not influential, they often know someone who is. Despite the various complexities in such optimization problems, we show that scalable adaptive seeding is achievable. In particular, we develop algorithms for linear influence models with provable approximation guarantees that can be gracefully parallelized. To show the effectiveness of our methods we collected data from various verticals social network users follow. For each vertical, we collected data on the users who responded to a certain post as well as their neighbors, and applied our methods on this data. Our experiments show that adaptive seeding is scalable, and importantly, that it obtains dramatic improvements over standard approaches of information dissemination.

References

  1. https://projects.coin-or.org/Clp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. A. Ageev and M. Sviridenko. Pipage rounding: A new method of constructing algorithms with proven performance guarantee. J. Comb. Optim., 8(3):307--328, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. E. Bakshy, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In WSDM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Borgs, M. Brautbar, J. Chayes, and B. Lucier. Maximizing social influence in nearly optimal time. In SODA, volume 14. SIAM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Chen. On the approximability of influence in social networks. In SODA, pages 1029--1037, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Cheng, L. Adamic, P. A. Dow, J. M. Kleinberg, and J. Leskovec. Can cascades be predicted? WWW '14, pages 925--936, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In KDD, pages 57--66, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Even-Dar and A. Shapira. A note on maximizing the spread of influence in social networks. In WINE, pages 281--286, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. L. Feld. Why your friends have more friends than you do. American Journal of Sociology, pages 1464--1477, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Goel, D. J. Watts, and D. G. Goldstein. The structure of online diffusion networks. In EC '12, Valencia, Spain, June 4-8, 2012, pages 623--638, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Golovin and A. Krause. Adaptive submodularity: Theory and applications in active learning and stochastic optimization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 42(1):427--486, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. A. Holley and T. M. Liggett. Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting infinite systems and the voter model. The annals of probability, pages 643--663, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. Horel and Y. Singer. Scalable methods for adaptively seeding a social network. CoRR, abs/1503.01438, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Kempe, J. M. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In KDD, pages 137--146, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Kempe, J. M. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. In ICALP, pages 1127--1138, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. J. Kleywegt, A. Shapiro, and T. Homem-de Mello. The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 12(2):479--502, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. Kumar, B. Moseley, S. Vassilvitskii, and A. Vattani. Fast greedy algorithms in mapreduce and streaming. In G. E. Blelloch and B. Vocking, editors, SPAA 2013, pages 1--10. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Lattanzi and Y. Singer. The power of random neighbors in social networks. WSDM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Leskovec, D. Chakrabarti, J. M. Kleinberg, and C. Faloutsos. Realistic, mathematically tractable graph generation and evolution, using kronecker multiplication. In PKDD 2005, volume 3721 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 133--145. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Leskovec, A. Krause, C. Guestrin, C. Faloutsos, J. M. VanBriesen, and N. S. Glance. Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. In KDD, pages 420--429, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Leskovec and A. Krevl. SNAP Datasets: Stanford large network dataset collection. http://snap.stanford.edu/data, June 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Mathioudakis, F. Bonchi, C. Castillo, A. Gionis, and A. Ukkonen. Sparsification of influence networks. In KDD, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. E. Mossel and S. Roch. On the submodularity of influence in social networks. In STOC, pages 128--134, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. G. L. Nemhauser, L. A. Wolsey, and M. L. Fisher. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions|i. Mathematical Programming, 14(1):265--294, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In KDD, pages 61--70, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In KDD, pages 61--70. ACM, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. L. Seeman and Y. Singer. Adaptive seeding in social networks. In FOCS, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J. Vondrak, C. Chekuri, and R. Zenklusen. Submodular function maximization via the multilinear relaxation and contention resolution schemes. In STOC, pages 783--792. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Yang and S. Counts. Predicting the speed, scale, and range of information diffusion in twitter. In ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. T. R. Zaman, R. Herbrich, J. V. Gael, and D. Stern. Predicting information spreading in twitter, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Scalable Methods for Adaptively Seeding a Social Network

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '15: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web
        May 2015
        1460 pages
        ISBN:9781450334693

        Copyright © 2015 Copyright is held by the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2)

        Publisher

        International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

        Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 May 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WWW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate131of929submissions,14%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader