skip to main content
10.1145/2745844.2745875acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Smartphone Energy Drain in the Wild: Analysis and Implications

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The limited battery life of modern smartphones remains a leading factor adversely affecting the mobile experience of millions of smartphone users. In order to extend battery life, it is critical to understand where and how is energy drain happening on users' phones under normal usage, for example, in a one-day cycle.

In this paper, we conduct the first extensive measurement and modeling of energy drain of 1520 smartphone in the wild. We make two primary contributions. First, we develop a hybrid power model that integrates utilization-based models and FSM-based models for different phone components with a novel technique that estimates the triggers for the FSM-based network power model based on network utilization. Second, through analyzing traces collected on 1520 Galaxy S3 and S4 devices in the wild, we present detailed analysis of where the CPU time and energy are spent across the 1520 devices, inside the 800 apps, as well as along several evolution dimensions, including hardware, Android, cellular, and app updates. Our findings of smartphone energy drain in the wild have significant implications to the various key players of the Android phone eco-system, including phone vendors Samsung, Android developers, app developers, and ultimately millions of smartphone users, towards the common goal of extending smartphone battery life and improving the user mobile experience.

References

  1. AppBrain, top android phones. www.appbrain.com/stats/top-android-phones.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. eMarketer, smartphone users worldwide will total 1.75 billion in 2014. www.emarketer.com/Article/Smartphone-Users-Worldwide-Will-Total-175-.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gpu benchmark 3d. play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kortenoeverdev.GPUbench.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. GPU benchmark app. play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=name.duzenko.farfaraway.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Monsoon power monitor. www.msoon.com/LabEquipment/PowerMonitor/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. TechCrunch, mobile app usage increases in 2014, as mobile web surfing declines.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. theGuardian, your smartphone's best app? battery life, say 89% of britons. www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/21/your-smartphones-best-app-ba%ttery-life-say-89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. N. Balasubramanian, A. Balasubramanian, and A. Venkataramani. Energy consumption in mobile phones: a measurement study and implications for network applications. In Proc of IMC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. Ding, D. Wagner, X. Chen, A. Pathak, Y. C. Hu, and A. Rice. Characterizing and modeling the impact of wireless signal strength on smartphone battery drain. In SIGMETRICS, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. H. Falaki, D. Lymberopoulos, R. Mahajan, S. Kandula, and D. Estrin. A first look at traffic on smartphones. In Proc. of IMC, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Garcia-Saavedra, P. Serrano, A. Banchs, and G. Bianchi. Energy consumption anatomy of 802.11 devices and its implication on modeling and design. In CoNEXT, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Huang, F. Qian, A. Gerber, Z. M. Mao, S. Sen, and O. Spatscheck. A close examination of performance and power characteristics of 4g lte networks. In Proc. of Mobisys, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Huang, F. Qian, Z. M. Mao, S. Sen, and O. Spatscheck. Screen-off traffic characterization and optimization in 3g/4g networks. In IMC, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Huang, Q. Xu, B. Tiwana, Z. M. Mao, M. Zhang, and P. Bahl. Anatomizing application performance difference on smartphones. In Proc. of Mobisys, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C.-Y. Li, C. Peng, S. Lu, and X. Wang. Energy-based rate adaptation for 802.11n. In Proc. of ACM MobiCom, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Mittal, A. Kansal, and R. Chandra. Empowering developers to estimate app energy consumption. In Proc. of ACM MobiCom, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Pathak, Y. C. Hu, and M. Zhang. Where is the energy spent inside my app? fine grained energy accounting on smartphones with eprof. In Proc. of EuroSys, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F. Qian, Z. Wang, A. Gerber, Z. Mao, S. Sen, and O. Spatscheck. Profiling resource usage for mobile applications: a cross-layer approach. In Proc. of Mobisys, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. F. Qian, Z. Wang, A. Gerber, Z. M. Mao, S. Sen, and O. Spatscheck. Characterizing radio resource allocation for 3g networks. In Proc. of IMC, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. L. Ravindranath, J. Padhye, S. Agarwal, R. Mahajan, I. Obermiller, and S. Shayandeh. Appinsight: Mobile app performance monitoring in the wild. In OSDI, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. Shye, B. Scholbrock, and G. Memik. Into the wild: studying real user activity patterns to guide power optimizations for mobile architectures. In MICRO, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Sommers and P. Barford. Cell vs. WiFi: On the performance of metro area mobile connections. In IMC, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Q. Xu, J. Erman, A. Gerber, Z. Mao, J. Pang, and S. Venkataraman. Identifying diverse usage behaviors of smartphone apps. In Proc. of IMC, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. L. Zhang, B. Tiwana, Z. Qian, Z. Wang, R. Dick, Z. Mao, and L. Yang. Accurate Online Power Estimation and Automatic Battery Behavior Based Power Model Generation for Smartphones. In Proc. of CODES+ISSS, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Y. Zhang, X. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Liu, L. Zhuang, and F. Zhao. Towards better cpu power management on multicore smartphones. In Proc. of HotPower, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Smartphone Energy Drain in the Wild: Analysis and Implications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMETRICS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems
      June 2015
      488 pages
      ISBN:9781450334860
      DOI:10.1145/2745844

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 June 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGMETRICS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate32of239submissions,13%Overall Acceptance Rate459of2,691submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader