skip to main content
10.1145/2764979.2764981acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesxpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lean startup: why large software companies should care

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 May 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Software industry has been shifting from traditional, plan-based software development to agile software development. Agile seems able to prescribe on how to develop a working software faster, but is still unable to give answer what product should be developed. This paper aims to investigate why large companies should adopt Lean startup to seek for radical innovation. This understanding could be used as a basis to confront disruptive innovation where the problem and the solution are both unknown. A single case study was conducted in a large software company. Eight practitioners with different roles were interviewed. We identified the characteristics of internal startups and the lessons learned on practising Lean Startup inside the large software company.

References

  1. P. A. Abetti. The birth and growth of Toshiba's laptop and notebook computers: A case study in Japanese corporate venturing. Business Venturing, 12(6):507--529, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. Assink. Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2):215--233, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C. K. Bart. New venture units: Use them wisely to manage innovation. Sloan management review, 29(4):35--43, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Birkinshaw, R. van Basten Batenburg, and G. Murray. Venturing to succeed. Business strategies review, 13(4):10--17, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Blank. Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5):64+, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Bosch, H. Olsson, J. Björk, and J. Ljungblad. The early stage software startup development model: a framework for operationalizing lean principles in software startups. Lean Enterprise Software and Systems, pages 1--15, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. K. Chandy and G. J. Tellis. The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3):1--17, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. C. Christensen. The innovator's dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. B. L. David. How internal venture groups innovate. Research Technology Management, 37(2):38--43, March/April 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. P. F. Drucker. Innovation and entrepreneurship. Harper and Row, New York, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Ghemawat. Market incumbency and technological inertia. Marketing Science, 10:161--171, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Gilb and K. Gilb. "Lean Startup" - The most extreme agile method by far. Agile Record, (9), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. Hammel. Leading the revolution. Harvard Business Review, Boston, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. A. Kitchenham, S. L. Pfleeger, L. M. Pickard, P. W. Jones, D. C. Hoaglin, K. E. Emam, and J. Rosenberg. Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(8):721--734, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. F. Kuratko, J. G. Covin, and R. P. Garret. Coporate venturing: Insights from actual performance. Business Horizons, 52(5):459--467, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. D. F. Kuratko, J. S. Hornsby, and J. G. Covin. Dignosing a firm's internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 57:37--47, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. R. G. McGrath. Advantage from adversity: Learning from dissapoinment in internal corporate ventures. Business Venturing, 12(5):121--142, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. P. Miles, and J. G. Covin. Exploring the practice of corporate venturing: Some common forms and their organizational implications. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 26(3):21--41, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. W. Morse. The delusion of intrapreneurship. Long Range Planning, 19(6):92--95, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Muller, L. Välikangas, and P. Merlyn. Metrics for innovation: Guidelines for developing a customized suite of innovation metrics. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 33(4):66--72, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. N. Oliver, L. Schab, and M. Holweg. Lean principles and premium brands: conflict or complement? International Journal of Production Research, 45(16):3723--3739, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. N. Paternoster, C. Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner, T. Gorschek, and P. Abrahamsson. Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 56(10):1200--1218, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. G. Pinchot. Introducing the 'intrapreneur': Successful innovatior in large companies sometimes function as in-house entrepreneurs, running projects as independent innovators would. IEEE Spectrum, 22(4):74--79, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. E. Ries. The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful business. Crown Business, USA, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. E. B. Roberts and C. A. Berry. Entering new business: selecting strategies for success. Sloan management review, 26(3):3--17, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. J. Ross. Corporations and entrepreneurs: Paradox and opportunity. Business Horizons, 30(4):76--80, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. P. Sharma and J. J. Chrisman. Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 23(3):11--27, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. J. Stanley M. Sutton. The role of process in a software start-up. IEEE Software, 17(4):33--39, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. H. Stevenson, M. J. Roberts, and D. E. Grousbeck. New business venture and the entrepreneur. 3rd edition. Irwin Publishing, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. H. H. Stevenson and J. C. Jarillo. A paradigm of entrepreneuship: entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11:17--27, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publication, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Womack and D. Jones. Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Free Press, New York, 2003 edition, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Lean startup: why large software companies should care

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          XP '15 workshops: Scientific Workshop Proceedings of the XP2015
          May 2015
          76 pages
          ISBN:9781450334099
          DOI:10.1145/2764979

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 May 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          XP '15 workshops Paper Acceptance Rate11of15submissions,73%Overall Acceptance Rate11of15submissions,73%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader