skip to main content
10.1145/2766462.2767772acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Personalized Semantic Ranking for Collaborative Recommendation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recently a ranking view of collaborative recommendation has received much attention in recommendation systems. Most of existing ranking approaches are based on pairwise assumption, i.e., everything that has not been selected is of less interest for a user. However it is usually not proper in many cases. To alleviate the limitation of this assumption, in this work, we present a unified framework, named Personalized Semantic Ranking (PSR). PSR models the personalized ranking and the user-generated content (UGC) simultaneously, and the semantic information extracted from UGC can make a remedy for the pairwise assumption. Moreover, utilizing the semantic information, PSR can capture the more subtle information of the user-item interaction and alleviate the overfitting problem caused by insufficient ratings. The learned topics in PSR can also serve as proper explanations for recommendation. Experimental results show that the proposed PSR yields significant improvements over the competitive compared methods on two typical datasets.

References

  1. D. Agarwal and B.-C. Chen. flda: Matrix factorization through latent dirichlet allocation. In WSDM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. JMLR, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In ICDM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Lee, S. Bengio, S. Kim, G. Lebanon, and Y. Singer. Local collaborative ranking. In WWW, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Pan, Y. Zhou, B. Cao, N. N. Liu, R. Lukose, M. Scholz, and Q. Yang. One-class collaborative filtering. In ICDM, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Rendle. Factorization machines. In ICDM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Bpr: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In UAI, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Salakhutdinov and A. Mnih. Probabilistic matrix factorization. In NIPS, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Wang and D. M. Blei. Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles. In ACM SIGKDD, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Personalized Semantic Ranking for Collaborative Recommendation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '15: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
        August 2015
        1198 pages
        ISBN:9781450336215
        DOI:10.1145/2766462

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 August 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '15 Paper Acceptance Rate70of351submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader