skip to main content
10.1145/276675.276695acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Query performance for tightly coupled distributed digital libraries

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 May 1998Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.i.J. Aalbersberg and E Sijstermans. High-quality and high-performance full-text document retrieval: the parallel infoguide system. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Information Systems, pages 151-158, Miami Beach, Florida, 199I. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.T. Anderson, D. Culler, and D. Patterson. A case for NOW (network of workstations). IEEE Micro, 15(1):54-64, February 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.EJ. Burkowski. Retrieval performance of a distributed text database utilizing a parallel processor document server. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Databases in Parallel and Distributed Systems, pages 71-79, Dublin, Ireland, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.B. Cahoon and K.S. McKinley. Performance evaluation of a distributed architecture for information retrieval. In Proc of the 19th A CM SIGIR Conference, pages 110- 118, Zurich, Switzerland, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.W. Frakes and R. Baeza-Yates, editors. Information Retrieval- Data Structures & Algorithms. Prentice Hall, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.D. Harman. Relevance feedback revisited. In Proc ofthe Fifteenth Annual International A CM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 1-10, Denmark, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.D. Harman. Overview of the third text retrieval conference. In Proceedings of the Third Text Retrieval Conference-TREC-3, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 1995. National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST Special Publication 500-225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.D. Harman, E. Fox, R. Baeza-Yates, and W. Lee. Inverted files. In W.B. Frakes and R. Baeza-Yates, editors, Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms, chapter 3. Prentice Hall, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.J. Heaps. Information Retrieval - Computational and Theoretical Aspects. Academic Press, NY, 1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.B.S. Jeong and E. Omiecinski. Inverted file partioning schemes in multiple disk systems. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and DistributedSystems, 6(2): 142-153, February 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Z. Lin. Cat: An execution model for concurrent full text search. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Information Systems, Miami Beach, Florida, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.I.A. Macleod, T.E Martin, B. Nordin, and J.R. Phillips. Strategies for building distributed information retrieval systems, bzformation Processing & Management, 23(6):511-528, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.National Institute of Standards and Technology. Proceedings of the text retrieval conference (trec), November 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.M. Persin. Document filtering for fast ranking. In Proc. of the 17th A CM SIGIR Conference. Springer Verlag, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.G. Salton and C. Buckley. Term-weighting approaches in automatic retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 24(5):513-523, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.G. Salton and M.J. McGill. Introduetion to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.C. Stanfill, R. Thau, and D. Waltz. A parallel indexed algorithm for information retrieval. In Proc. ofthe 12th A CM SIGIR Conference, pages 88-97, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.A. Tomasic and H. Garcia-Molina. Performance of inverted indices in shared-nothing distributed text document information retrieval systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Information Systems, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Query performance for tightly coupled distributed digital libraries

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  DL '98: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Digital libraries
                  May 1998
                  319 pages
                  ISBN:0897919653
                  DOI:10.1145/276675

                  Copyright © 1998 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 11 May 1998

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate95of346submissions,27%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader