skip to main content
10.1145/2783258.2783293acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dynamic Topic Modeling for Monitoring Market Competition from Online Text and Image Data

Published:10 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a dynamic topic model for monitoring temporal evolution of market competition by jointly leveraging tweets and their associated images. For a market of interest (e.g. luxury goods), we aim at automatically detecting the latent topics (e.g. bags, clothes, luxurious) that are competitively shared by multiple brands (e.g. Burberry, Prada, and Chanel), and tracking temporal evolution of the brands' stakes over the shared topics. One of key applications of our work is social media monitoring that can provide companies with temporal summaries of highly overlapped or discriminative topics with their major competitors. We design our model to correctly address three major challenges: multiview representation of text and images, modeling of competitiveness of multiple brands over shared topics, and tracking their temporal evolution. As far as we know, no previous model can satisfy all the three challenges. For evaluation, we analyze about 10 millions of tweets and 8 millions of associated images of the 23 brands in the two categories of luxury and beer. Through experiments, we show that the proposed approach is more successful than other candidate methods for the topic modeling of competition. We also quantitatively demonstrate the generalization power of the proposed method for three prediction tasks.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1425.m4v

m4v

3.3 GB

p1425.mp4

mp4

202.6 MB

References

  1. A. Ahmed and E. P. Xing. Timeline: A Dynamic Hierarchical Dirichlet Process Model for Recovering Birth/Death and Evolution of Topics in Text Stream. In UAI, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. N. Archak, A. Ghose, and P. G. Ipeirotis. Show me the Money! Deriving the Pricing Power of Product Features by Mining Consumer Reviews. In KDD, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Blei, A. Ng, and M. Jordan. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. JMLR, 3:993--1022, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. M. Blei and M. I. Jordan. Modeling Annotated Data. In SIGIR, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. M. Blei and J. D. Lafferty. Dynamic Topic Models. In ICML, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Chang, J. L. Boyd-graber, S. Gerrish, C. Wang, and D. M. Blei. Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models. In NIPS, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. N. Chen, J. Zhu, F. Sun, and X. Eric P. Large-Margin Predictive Latent Subspace Learning for Multiview Data Analysis. IEEE PAMI, 34:2365--2378, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. Doyle and C. Elkan. Financial Topic Models. In NIPS Workshop for Applications for Topic Models: Text and Beyond, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Y. Feng and M. Lapata. Topic Models for Image Annotation and Text Illustration. In NAACL HLT, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N. Glance, M. Hurst, K. Nigam, M. Siegler, R. Stockton, and T. Tomokiyo. Deriving Marketing Intelligence from Online Discussion. In KDD, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Iwata, S. Watanabe, T. Yamada, and N. Ueda. Topic Tracking Model for Analyzing Consumer Purchase Behavior. In IJCAI, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Kim, C. Faloutsos, and M. Hebert. Unsupervised Modeling and Recognition of Object Categories with Combination of Visual Contents and Geometric Similarity Links. In ACM MIR, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Kurashima, T. Iwata, T. Hoshide, N. Takaya, and K. Fujimura. Geo Topic Model: Joint Modeling of User's Activity Area and Interests for Location Recommendation. In WSDM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Q. Mei, X. Ling, M. Wondra, H. Su, and C. Zhai. Topic Sentiment Mixture: Modeling Facets and Opinions in Weblogs. In WWW, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. O. Netzer, R. Feldman, J. Goldenberg, and M. Fresko. Mine Your Own Business: Market-Structure Surveillance Through Text Mining. Marketing Science, 31(3):521--543, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. O'Connor, M. Krieger, and D. Ahn. TweetMotif: Exploratory Search and Topic Summarization for Twitter. In ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. B. Pang and L. Lee. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2:1--135, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. F. Prescott and S. H. Miller. Proven Strategies in Competitive Intelligence: Lessons from the Trenches. Wiley, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. I. Titov and R. McDonald. Modeling Online Reviews with Multi-grain Topic Models. In WWW, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Vedaldi and K. Lenc. MatConvNet -- Convolutional Neural Networks for MATLAB. In CoRR, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Z. Wang, P. Cui, L. Xie, W. Zhu, Y. Rui, and S. Yang. Bilateral Correspondence Model for Words-and-Pictures Association in Multimedia-rich Microblogs. ACM TOMM, 10:2365--2378, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Wu, W. M. Rand, and L. Raschid. Recommendations in Social Media for Brand Monitoring. In RecSys, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. P. Xie and E. P. Xing. Integrating Document Clustering and Topic Modeling. In UAI, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. K. Xu, S. S. Liao, J. Li, and Y. Song. Mining Comparative Opinions from Customer Reviews for Competitive Intelligence. Decision Support Systems, 50:743--754, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Zhu, A. Ahmed, and E. P. Xing. MedLDA: Maximum Margin Supervised Topic Models. JMLR, 13:2237--2278, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. Zhu and E. P. Xing. Sparse Topical Coding. In UAI, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic Topic Modeling for Monitoring Market Competition from Online Text and Image Data

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              KDD '15: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
              August 2015
              2378 pages
              ISBN:9781450336642
              DOI:10.1145/2783258

              Copyright © 2015 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 10 August 2015

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              KDD '15 Paper Acceptance Rate160of819submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

              Upcoming Conference

              KDD '24

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader