ABSTRACT
Target clicking having proved an indispensable building block of interface design, it is little surprise that the speed/accuracy trade-off of aimed movement has always been a keen concern of HCI research. The trade-off is described by the Fitts law. In HCI and psychology likewise, the traditional approach has focused on the time-minimisation paradigm of Fitts [5], ignoring other relevant paradigms in which the Fitts law fails, such as the spread-minimisation paradigm of Schmidt et al. [18]. This paper aims at unearthing and consolidating the foundations of the speed/accuracy trade-off problem. Taking mean movement time as our speed measure and relative spread as our accuracy measure, we show that a small set of obvious mathematical axioms predict not only the data from the Fitts and the Schmidt paradigms but also the data from the more recent dual-minimisation paradigm of Guiard et al. [7]. The new mathematical framework encourages a more complete understanding: not only is it possible to estimate an amount of resource, a quantity equivalent to the classic throughput, it is also possible to characterize the resource-allocation strategy --- the other, no less important facet of the trade-off problem which has been left aside so far. The proposed approach may help HCI practitioners obtain from their experimental data more reliable and more complete information on the comparative merits of design options.
- Chapuis, O., & Dragicevic, P. (2011). Effects of motor scale, visual scale, and quantization on small target acquisition difficulty. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 18(3), 13. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Crossman, E. R. F. W. (1957). The speed and accuracy of hand movements. In: Crossman, E. R. F. W., Seymour, W. D. (Eds.), The Nature and Acquisition of Industrial Skill. Unpublished report to the MRC and DSIR Joint Committee on Individual Efficiency in Industry.Google Scholar
- Crossman, E. R. F. W., & Goodeve, P. J. (1963/1983). Feedback control of hand-movement and Fitts' law. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(2), 251--278.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elliott, D., Helsen, W. F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological bulletin, 127 (3), 342.Google Scholar
- Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381--391. Reprinted in J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen., 1992, 121, 262--269.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guiard, Y. (2009). The problem of consistency in the design of Fitts' law experiments: Consider either target distance and width or movement form and scale. In Proceedings of CHI 2009 (pp. 1809--1818). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guiard, Y., Olafsdottir, H. B. (2011). On the measurement of movement difficulty in the standard approach to Fitts' law. PLoS one, 6(10): e24389.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guiard, Y., Olafsdottir, H. B., Perrault, S. T. (2011). Fitts' law as an explicit time/error trade-off. In Proceedings of CHI 2011 (pp. 1609--1628). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hoffmann, E. R. (2013). Which version/variation of Fitts' law? A critique of information-theory models. Journal of Motor Behavior, 45(3), 205--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ISO (2002). Reference Number: ISO 9241-9:2000(E). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)---Part 9---Requirements for non-keyboard input devices (ISO 9241-9) (Vol. February 15, 2002): International Organisation for Standardisation.Google Scholar
- McMahon, T. A., & Bonner, T. (1983). On Size and Life. New York: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar
- MacKenzie, I. S. (1989). A note on the information-theoretic basis for Fitts' law. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21(3), 323--330.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meehl, P. E. (1997). The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 393--425). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Smith, J. E. K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340--370.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive psychology, 7(1), 44--64.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1976). On the analysis of performance operating characteristics. Psychological Review, 83, 508--510.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rioul, O., & Guiard, Y. (2012). Power vs. logarithmic model of Fitts' law: A mathematical analysis. Mathematics and social sciences, 199, 85--96.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415--451.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Soukoreff, R. W., & MacKenzie, I. S. (2004). Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation: Perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 751--789. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viviani, P., & Terzuolo, C. (1982). Trajectory determines movement dynamics. Neuroscience, 7(2), 431--437.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Warren Jr, W. H., & Shaw, R. E., Eds. (2013). Persistence and change: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Event Perception. Psychology Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Welford, A. T., Norris, A. H., & Shock, N. W. (1969). Speed and accuracy of movement and their changes with age. Acta psychological, 30, 3--15.Google Scholar
- Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta psychologica, 41(1), 67--85.Google Scholar
- Woodworth, R. S. (1899). Accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 3(3), i.Google Scholar
- Wright, C. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1983). Conditions for a linear speed-accuracy trade-off in aimed movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(2), 279--296.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhai, S., Kong, J., & Ren, X. (2004). Speed-accuracy tradeoff in Fitts' law tasks --- on the equivalency of actual and nominal pointing precision. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 823--856. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A mathematical description of the speed/accuracy trade-off of aimed movement
Recommendations
Fitt's law as an explicit time/error trade-off
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe widely-held view that Fitts' law expresses a speed/accuracy trade-off is presumably correct, but it is vague. We outline a simple resource-allocation theory of Fitts' law in which movement time and error trade for each other. The theory accounts ...
Speed-accuracy tradeoff of fingertip force control with visual/audio/haptic feedback
Fingertip force control process obeyed Fitts law in each single sensory modality (visual/audio/haptic) when the difficulty level was within a specific range.The response time in the audio feedback mode was the shortest among the three feedback ...
Speed-accuracy trade-off in planned arm movements with delayed feedback
The Vector Integration to Endpoint (VITE) circuit describes a real-time neural network model simulating behavioral and neurobiological properties of planned arm and hand movements by the interaction of two populations of neurons. We analyze the speed-...
Comments