Michael Ringenburg
Adrian Sampson
Abstract
Energy efficiency is a key concern in the design of modern computer systems. One promising approach to energy-efficient computation, approximate computing, trades off output accuracy for significant gains in energy efficiency. However, debugging the actual cause of output quality problems in approximate programs is challenging. This paper presents dynamic techniques to debug and monitor the quality of approximate computations. We propose both offline debugging tools that instrument code to determine the key sources of output degradation and online approaches that monitor the quality of deployed applications.
We present two offline debugging techniques and three online monitoring mechanisms. The first offline tool identifies correlations between output quality and the execution of individual approximate operations. The second tracks approximate operations that flow into a particular value. Our online monitoring mechanisms are complementary approaches designed for detecting quality problems in deployed applications, while still maintaining the energy savings from approximation.
We present implementations of our techniques and describe their usage with seven applications. Our online monitors control output quality while still maintaining significant energy efficiency gains, and our offline tools provide new insights into the effects of approximation on output quality.
- Carlos Alvarez, Jesus Corbal, and Mateo Valero. Fuzzy memoization for floating-point multimedia applications. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 54(7):922 -- 927, July 2005. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Woongki Baek and Trishul M. Chilimbi. Green: a framework for supporting energy-conscious programming using controlled approximation. In PLDI, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Carbin, Deokhwan Kim, Sasa Misailovic, and Martin C. Rinard. Reasoning about relaxed programs. In PLDI, June 2012.Google Scholar
- Michael Carbin, Sasa Misailovic, and Martin C. Rinard. Verifying quantitative reliability for programs that execute on unreliable hardware. In OOPSLA, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lakshmi N. Chakrapani, Bilge E. S. Akgul, Suresh Cheemalavagu, Pinar Korkmaz, Krishna V. Palem, and Balasubramanian Seshasayee. Ultra-efficient (embedded) SOC architectures based on probabilistic CMOS (PCMOS) technology. In DATE, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Swarat Chaudhuri, Sumit Gulwani, Roberto Lublinerman, and Sara Navidpour. Proving programs robust. In FSE, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- www.coverity.com.Google Scholar
- Marc de Kruijf, Shuou Nomura, and Karthikeyan Sankaralingam. Relax: an architectural framework for software recovery of hardware faults. In ISCA, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hadi Esmaeilzadeh, Emily Blem, Renee St. Amant, Karthikeyan Sankaralingam, and Doug Burger. Dark silicon and the end of multicore scaling. In ISCA, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hadi Esmaeilzadeh, Adrian Sampson, Luis Ceze, and Doug Burger. Architecture support for disciplined approximate programming. In ASPLOS, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hadi Esmaeilzadeh, Adrian Sampson, Luis Ceze, and Doug Burger. Neural acceleration for general-purpose approximate programs. In MICRO, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malay Ganai, Dongyoon Lee, and Aarti Gupta. Dtam: dynamic taint analysis of multi-threaded programs for relevancy. In ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE), 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beayna Grigorian and Glenn Reinman. Dynamically adaptive and reliable approximate computing using light-weight error analysis. In NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems (AHS), 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beayna Grigorian and Glenn Reinman. Improving coverage and reliability in approximate computing using application-specific, light-weight checks. In First Workshop on Approximate Computing Across the System Stack (WACAS), 2014.Google Scholar
- Henry Hoffmann, Stelios Sidiroglou, Michael Carbin, Sasa Misailovic, Anant Agarwal, and Martin Rinard. Dynamic knobs for responsive power-aware computing. In ASPLOS, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steve C. Johnson. Lint, a C Program Checker. Unix Programmer's Supplementary Documents, vol. 1, 1986.Google Scholar
- Matthias Kalisch. Asteroid field. http://jcolorexpansion.sourceforge.net/asteroid_field.html.Google Scholar
- Michael O. Lam, Jeffrey K. Hollingsworth, Bronis R. de Supinski, and Matthew P. Legendre. Automatically adapting programs for mixed-precision floating-point computation. In 27th ACM International Conference on Supercomputing, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Larkhoon Leem, Hyungmin Cho, Jason Bau, Quinn A. Jacobson, and Subhasish Mitra. ERSA: Error resilient system architecture for probabilistic applications. In DATE, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Song Liu, Karthik Pattabiraman, Thomas Moscibroda, and Benjamin G. Zorn. Flikker: Saving refresh-power in mobile devices through critical data partitioning. In ASPLOS, 2011.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sasa Misailovic, Daniel M. Roy, and Martin C. Rinard. Probabilistically accurate program transformations. In SAS, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sasa Misailovic, Stelios Sidiroglou, Hank Hoffman, and Martin Rinard. Quality of service profiling. In ICSE, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sriram Narayanan, John Sartori, Rakesh Kumar, and Douglas L. Jones. Scalable stochastic processors. In DATE, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicholas Nethercote and Julian Seward. Valgrind: a framework for heavyweight dynamic binary instrumentation. In PLDI, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael F. Ringenburg. Dynamic Analyses of Result Quality in Energy-Aware Approximate Programs. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Feb 2014.Google Scholar
- Philip Roth and Jeremy Meredith. Value influence analysis for message passing applications. In 28th ACM International Conference on Supercomputing, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adrian Sampson, Werner Dietl, Emily Fortuna, Danushen Gnanapragasam, Luis Ceze, and Dan Grossman. EnerJ: Approximate data types for safe and general low-power computation. In PLDI, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stelios Sidiroglou, Sasa Misailovic, Henry Hoffman, and Martin Rinard. Managing performance vs. accuracy trade-offs with loop perforation. In FSE, 2011.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob Sorber, Alexander Kostadinov, Matthew Garber, Matthew Brennan, Mark D. Corner, and Emery D. Berger. Eon: a language and runtime system for perpetual systems. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zeyuan Allen Zhu, Sasa Misailovic, Jonathan A. Kelner, and Martin Rinard. Randomized accuracy-aware program transformations for efficient approximate computations. In POPL, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Monitoring and Debugging the Quality of Results in Approximate Programs
Recommendations
Monitoring and Debugging the Quality of Results in Approximate Programs
ASPLOS '15Energy efficiency is a key concern in the design of modern computer systems. One promising approach to energy-efficient computation, approximate computing, trades off output accuracy for significant gains in energy efficiency. However, debugging the ...
Monitoring and Debugging the Quality of Results in Approximate Programs
ASPLOS '15: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating SystemsEnergy efficiency is a key concern in the design of modern computer systems. One promising approach to energy-efficient computation, approximate computing, trades off output accuracy for significant gains in energy efficiency. However, debugging the ...
A model for systematic monitoring and debugging of starvation bugs in multicore software
SCTDCP 2016: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Specification, Comprehension, Testing, and Debugging of Concurrent ProgramsWith the development of multicore hardware, concurrent, parallel and multicore software are becoming increasingly popular. Software companies are spending a huge amount of time and resources to nd and debug the bugs. Among all types of software bugs, ...
Comments