skip to main content
10.1145/2806416.2806461acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving Microblog Retrieval with Feedback Entity Model

Published:17 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

When searching over the microblogging, users prefer using queries including terms that represent some specific entities. Meanwhile, tweets, though limited within 140 characters, are often generated with one or more entities. Entities, as an important part of tweets, usually convey rich information for modeling relevance from new perspectives. In this paper, we propose a feedback entity model and integrate it into an adaptive language modeling framework in order to improve the retrieval performance. The feedback entity model is estimated with the latest entity-associated tweets based upon a regularized maximum likelihood criterion. More specifically, we assume that the entity-associated tweets are generated by a mixture model, which consists of the entity model, the domain-specific language model and the collection language model. Experimental results on two public Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) Twitter corpora demonstrate the significant superiority of our approach over the state-of-the-art baselines.

References

  1. A. Z. Broder, M. Fontoura, E. Gabrilovich, A. Joshi, V. Josifovski, and T. Zhang. Robust classification of rare queries using web knowledge. In SIGIR, pages 231--238, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Cao, J.-Y. Nie, J. Gao, and S. Robertson. Selecting good expansion terms for pseudo-relevance feedback. In SIGIR, pages 243--250, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Dalton, L. Dietz, and J. Allan. Entity query feature expansion using knowledge base links. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistcal Society, 39(B):1--38, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. F. Diaz and D. Metzler. Improving the estimation of relevance models using large external corpora. In SIGIR, pages 154--161. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Efron. Hashtag retrieval in a microblogging environment. In SIGIR, pages 787--788, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Guo, G. Xu, X. Cheng, and H. Li. Named entity recognition in query. In J. Allan, J. A. Aslam, M. Sanderson, C. Zhai, and J. Zobel, editors, SIGIR, pages 267--274. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Keikha, S. Gerani, and F. Crestani. Time-based relevance models. In SIGIR, pages 1087--1088. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. D. Lafferty and C. Zhai. Document language models, query models, and risk minimization for information retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 111--119, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. X. Li and W. B. Croft. Time-based language models. In CIKM, pages 469--475, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Li, W. P. R. Luk, K. S. E. Ho, and F. L. K. Chung. Improving weak ad-hoc queries using wikipedia as external corpus. In SIGIR, pages 797--798, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. F. Liang, R. Qiang, and J. Yang. Exploiting real-time information retrieval in the microblogosphere. In JCDL, pages 267--276, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Lin and M. Efron. Overview of the TREC-2013 Microblog Track. In TREC'13, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Y. Lv and C. Zhai. A comparative study of methods for estimating query language models with pseudo feedback. In CIKM, pages 1895--1898, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Massoudi, M. Tsagkias, M. de Rijke, and W. Weerkamp. Incorporating query expansion and quality indicators in searching microblog posts. In ECIR, volume 6611 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 362--367. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Mitra, A. Singhal, and C. Buckley. Improving automatic query expansion. In SIGIR, pages 206--214. ACM, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. T. Miyanishi, K. Seki, and K. Uehara. Improving pseudo-relevance feedback via tweet selection. In CIKM, pages 439--448, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. I. Ounis, C. Macdonald, J. Lin, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the TREC-2011 Microblog Track. In TREC'11, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. Pan, P. Zhang, J. Li, D. Song, J.-R. Wen, Y. Hou, B. Hu, Y. Jia, and A. N. D. Roeck. Using dempster-shafer's evidence theory for query expansion based on freebase knowledge. In AIRS, volume 8281 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 121--132. Springer, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. D. Ramage, D. Hall, R. Nallapati, and C. D. Manning. Labeled lda: A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora. In EMNLP, pages 248--256. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. Ritter, S. Clark, Mausam, and O. Etzioni. Named entity recognition in tweets: An experimental study. In EMNLP, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Ritter, Mausam, O. Etzioni, and S. Clark. Open domain event extraction from twitter. In KDD, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. I. Soboroff, I. Ounis, and J. Lin. Overview of the TREC-2012 Microblog Track. In TREC'12, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. N. Stokes, Y. Li, L. Cavedon, E. Huang, J. Rong, and J. Zobel. Entity-based relevance feedback for genomic list answer retrieval. In TREC, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. Teevan, D. Ramage, and M. R. Morris.#twittersearch: a comparison of microblog search and web search. In WSDM, pages 35--44, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J.-R. Wen, H. Zhang, and J.-Y. Nie. Query clustering using content words and user feedback. In W. B. Croft, D. J. Harper, D. H. Kraft, and J. Zobel, editors, SIGIR, pages 442--443. ACM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. C. Zhai and J. D. Lafferty. Model-based feedback in the language modeling approach to information retrieval. In CIKM, pages 403--410, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. C. Zhai and J. D. Lafferty. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 334--342, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improving Microblog Retrieval with Feedback Entity Model

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '15: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
        October 2015
        1998 pages
        ISBN:9781450337946
        DOI:10.1145/2806416

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 October 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CIKM '15 Paper Acceptance Rate165of646submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader