skip to main content
10.1145/2820426.2820432acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Recommending Web Service Based on Ontologies for Digital Repositories

Published:27 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital Repositories (DRs) offer functionalities for managing, storing and accessing digital contents. DRs may make available a wide range of content types, including theses, dissertations, papers, videos, works of art and literacy works. Some DRs have used recommendation systems to offer users suggestions about digital contents that they might be interested. In this paper, we propose a multi-domain Recommender Web Service supporting multiple types of recommendation audience. The flexibility of domain and audience is provided by the use of ontologies to represent domain-specific knowledge. In order to test the feasibility of our proposal, the paper presents two use cases of our Recommending Web Service.

References

  1. M. Anjorin, I. Dackiewicz, A. Fernández, C. Rensing, et al. A framework for cross-platform graph-based recommendations for tel. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on recommender systems in technology enhanced learning, pages 83--88, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Batra and C. Tyagi. Comparative analysis of relational and graph databases. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Beham, B. Kump, T. Ley, and S. Lindstaedt. Recommending knowledgeable people in a work-integrated learning system. Procedia Computer Science, 1(2):2783--2792, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. W. N. Borst. Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse. PhD thesis, Enschede, September 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Brin and L. Page. Reprint of: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer networks, 56(18):3825--3833, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. I. Cantador, P. Castells, and A. Bellogín. An enhanced semantic layer for hybrid recommender systems: Application to news recommendation. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 7(1):44--78, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Demovic, E. Fritscher, J. Kriz, O. Kuzmik, O. Proksa, D. Vandlikova, D. Zelenik, and M. Bielikova. Movie recommendation based on graph traversal algorithms. In DEXA Workshops, pages 152--156, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. DSpace. Dspace - dspace is a turnkey institutional repository application. http://www.dspace.org/, 2015. Accessed: 2015-06--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. D. Ekstrand, M. Ludwig, J. A. Konstan, and J. T. Riedl. Rethinking the recommender research ecosystem: Reproducibility, openness, and lenskit. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys '11, pages 133--140, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Elliott, J. Rutherford, and J. Erickson. A recommender system for the dspace open repository platform. Technical report, Tech. Rep., HP Laboratories, Bristol, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Z. Gantner, S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Mymedialite: A free recommender system library. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys '11, pages 305--308, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W. O. W. Group. Owl 2 web ontology language document overview (second edition). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/, 2012. Accessed: 2015-06-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Horridge and S. Bechhofer. The owl api: A java api for owl ontologies. Semantic Web, 2(1):11--21, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Q. Huang, B. Chen, J. Wang, and T. Mei. Personalized video recommendation through graph propagation. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl., 10(4):32:1--32:17, July 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. O. A. Initiative. Open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting. https://www.openarchives.org/pmh/. Accessed: 2015-06-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. K. Jacobson and B. Ferris. The recommendation ontology 0.3: Namespace document 02 august 2010. http://smiy.sourceforge.net/rec/spec/ recommendationontology.html, 2010. Accessed: 2015-06-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. P. B. Kantor, L. Rokach, F. Ricci, and B. Shapira. Recommender systems handbook. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F. D. Lemos, R. A. Carmo, W. Viana, and R. M. Andrade. Improving photo recommendation with context awareness. In Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web, WebMedia '12, pages 321--330, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. F. F.-H. Nah. A study on tolerable waiting time: how long are web users willing to wait? Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(3):153--163, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Neo4j. Neo4j, the world's leading graph database. http://www.neo4j.com. Accessed: 2015-06-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Omeka. Omeka homepage. http://www.Omeka.org/. Accessed: 2015-06-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Owen, R. Anil, T. Dunning, and E. Friedman. Mahout in Action. Manning Publications Co., Greenwich, CT, USA, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. P. A. Rego, F. D. Lemos, W. Viana, F. Trinta, and J. N. de Souza. Mapreduce performance evaluation for knowledge-based recommendation of context-tagged photos. In Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web, WebMedia '13, pages 249--256, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Sieg, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Improving the effectiveness of collaborative recommendation with ontology-based user profiles. In proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Information Heterogeneity and Fusion in Recommender Systems, pages 39--46. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. R. Willrich, R. de Moura Speroni, C. V. Lima, A. L. de Oliveira Diaz, and S. M. Penedo. Adaptive information retrieval system applied to digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web, WebMedia '06, pages 165--173, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Recommending Web Service Based on Ontologies for Digital Repositories

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WebMedia '15: Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
        October 2015
        266 pages
        ISBN:9781450339599
        DOI:10.1145/2820426

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 October 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WebMedia '15 Paper Acceptance Rate21of61submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader