skip to main content
10.1145/2851613.2851656acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Wavelet transform based vehicle detection from sensors for bridge weigh-in-motion

Published:04 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

A variety of technologies can be applied to the collection and analysis of traffic data in smart cities. Vehicle detection, which is a fundamental aspect of traffic analysis, can be achieved by various technologies such as surveillance videos and loop detectors. This paper proposes a vehicle detection method that uses a set of sensors for bridge weigh-in-motion, which is an in situ nonintrusive method that avoids the disadvantages of other systems. In a practical implementation of this method, where data streams from sensors have to be processed in real time, we found vehicle-detection inaccuracies caused by the characteristics of signals from the sensors. To address these problems, we propose a simple and efficient method that uses two sensors and a wavelet transform. Our method improves the system accuracy by comparing the results of a robust wavelet-transform peak-detection technique applied to the signal streams from the two sensors. Experimental results demonstrate the high performance of this method, which can meet the accuracy requirements of realtime scenarios.

References

  1. Transportation Systems Engineering. Chapter 8. Automated Traffic Measurement. Dr. Tom V. Mathew, IIT Bombay, February 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Traffic Detector Handbook, volume I & II. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, October 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Chatterjee, E. OBrien, Y. Li, and A. González. Wavelet domain analysis for identification of vehicle axles from bridge measurements. Computers and Structures, 84(28):1792--1801, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. I. Daubechies. Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. P. Du, W. A. Kibbe, and S. M. Lin. Improved peak detection in mass spectrum by incorporating continuous wavelet transform-based pattern matching. Bioinformatics, 22(17):2059--2065, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Helmi, B. Bakht, and A. Mufti. Accurate measurements of gross vehicle weight through bridge weigh-in-motion: a case study. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 4(3):195--208, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. B. Jacob and V. Feypell-de la Beaumelle. Improving truck safety: potential of weigh-in-motion technology. IATSS Research, 34(1):9--15, July 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Kalin, A. Znidaric, and I. Lavric. Practical implementation of nothing-on-the road bridge weigh-in-motion system. Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, June 18-22 2006. 9th International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Kinoshita, A. Takasu, and J. Adachi. Real-time traffic incident detection using probe-car data on the Tokyo metropolitan expressway. pages 43--45, Washington, D. C., USA, October 27-30 2014. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Kinoshita, A. Takasu, and J. Adachi. Traffic incident detection using probabilistic topic model. pages 323--330. EDBT/ICDT Workshop on Mining Urban Data (MUD 2014), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Lechner, M. Lieschnegg, O. Mariani, and M. Pircher. Detection of vehicle data in a bridge weigh-in-motion system. Modern Traffic and Transportation Engineering Research, 2(3), July 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Lechner, M. Lieschnegg, O. Mariani, M. Pircher, and A. Fuchs. A wavelet-based bridge weigh-in-motion system. International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems, 3(4), December 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. T. Ojio and K. Yamada. Bridge weigh-in-motion system using reaction force method. pages 269--276. Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges/Colloquium on Bridge Vibration. Japan Society of Civil Engineers, September 1-2 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Sivaraman and M. M. Trivedi. A review of recent developments in vision-based vehicle detection. Gold Coast, Australia, June 23-26 2013. 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Wavelet transform based vehicle detection from sensors for bridge weigh-in-motion

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SAC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
            April 2016
            2360 pages
            ISBN:9781450337397
            DOI:10.1145/2851613

            Copyright © 2016 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 4 April 2016

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            SAC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate252of1,047submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader