skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858117acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

A Model Relating Pupil Diameter to Mental Workload and Lighting Conditions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a proof-of-concept approach to estimating mental workload by measuring the user's pupil diameter under various controlled lighting conditions. Knowing the user's mental workload is desirable for many application scenarios, ranging from driving a car, to adaptive workplace setups. Typically, physiological sensors allow inferring mental workload, but these sensors might be rather uncomfortable to wear. Measuring pupil diameter through remote eye-tracking instead is an unobtrusive method. However, a practical eye-tracking-based system must also account for pupil changes due to variable lighting conditions. Based on the results of a study with tasks of varying mental demand and six different lighting conditions, we built a simple model that is able to infer the workload independently of the lighting condition in 75% of the tested conditions.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p5776-pfleging.mp4

mp4

235.5 MB

References

  1. Ulf Ahlstrom and Ferne J. Friedman-Berg. 2006. Using eye movement activity as a correlate of cognitive workload. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36, 7 (Jul. 2006), 623--636. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2006.04.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Amanda N. Baraldi and Craig K. Enders. 2010. An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology 48, 1 (Feb. 2010), 5--37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jackson Beatty. 1982. Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin 91, 2 (Mar. 1982), 276--292. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033--2909.91.2.276Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Simone Benedetto, Marco Pedrotti, Luca Minin, Thierry Baccino, Alessandra Re, and Roberto Montanari. 2011. Driver workload and eye blink duration. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior 14, 3 (May 2011), 199--208. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2010.12.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Anne-Marie Brouwer, Maarten A. Hogervorst1, Jan B. F. van Erp, Tobias Heffelaar, Patrick H. Zimmerman, and Robert Oostenveld. 2012. Estimating workload using EEG spectral power and ERPs in the n-back task. Journal of Neural Engineering 9, 4, Article 045008 (Jul. 2012), 045008, 14 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741--2560/9/4/045008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Joseph F. Coughlin, Bryan Reimer, and Bruce Mehler. 2009. Driver Wellness, Safety & the Development of an AwareCar. MIT AgeLab White Paper. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. http://web.mit.edu/reimer/www/pdfs/coughlin_wellness_2009.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrew T. Duchowski. 2002. A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34, 4 (Nov. 2002), 455--470. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195475Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Christine Fogarty, and John A. Stern, 1989. Eye movements and blinks: Their relationship to higher cognitive processes. International Journal of Psychophysiology 8, 1 (Sep. 1983), 35--42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167--8760(89)90017--2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Thomas M. Gable, Andrew L. Kun, Bruce N. Walker, and Riley J. Winton. 2015. Comparing heart rate and pupil size as objective measures of workload in the driving context: initial look. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 20--25. DOI: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2809730.2809745 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Alan Gevins, and Michael E. Smith. 2003. Neurophysiological measures of cognitive workload during human-computer interaction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 4, 1--2 (2003), 113--131. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/1080/14639220210159717Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Audrey Girouard and Erin Treacy Solovey and Robert J.K. Jacob. 2013. Designing a passive brain computer interface using real time classification of functional near-infrared spectroscopy. International Journal of Autonomous and Adaptive Communication Systems 6,1 (2013), 26--44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJAACS.2013.050689 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. M. A. Gronwall. 1977. Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery From Concussion. Perceptual and Motor Skills 44 (1977), 367--373. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jennifer A. Healey, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2005. Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 6, 2 (June 2005), 156--166. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2005.848368 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Peter A. Heeman, Tomer Meshorer, Andrew L. Kun, Oskar Palinko, and Zeljko Medenica. 2013. Estimating cognitive load using pupil diameter during a spoken dialogue task. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 242--245. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516570 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Daniel Kahneman, D., and Jackson Beatty. 1966. Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory. Science 154, 3756 (Dec. 1966), 1583--1585. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.154.3756.1583Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Daniel Kahneman, Linda Onuska, L., and Ruth E. Wolman. 1968. Effects of pupillary response in a short-term memory task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20, 3 (1968), 309--311. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640746808400168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. W. K. Kirchner. Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of experimental psychology 55, 4 (Apr. 1958), 352--358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeff Klingner, Rakshit Kumar, and Pat Hanrahan. 2008. Measuring the task-evoked pupillary response with a remote eye tracker. In Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications (ETRA '08). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 69--72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1344471.1344489 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jeff Klingner, Barbara Tversky, and Pat Hanrahan. 2011. Effects of visual and verbal presentation on cognitive load in vigilance, memory, and arithmetic tasks. Psychophysiology 48, 3 (Mar. 2011), 323--332. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469--8986.2010.01069.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Andrew L. Kun, Susanne Boll, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2016. Shirting gears: User interfaces in the age of autonomous driving. IEEE Pervasive Computing 15, 1 (January-March 2016), 32--37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2016.14 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Andrew L. Kun, and Zeljko Medenica. 2012. Video call or not, that is the question. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1631--1636. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223684 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Andrew L. Kun, Oskar Palinko, Zeljko Medenica, and Peter A. Heeman. 2013. On the Feasibility of Using Pupil Diameter to Estimate Cognitive Load Changes for In-Vehicle Spoken Dialogues. In INTERSPEECH, (2013), 3766--3770.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Andrew L. Kun, Oskar Palinko, and Razumeniø, I. Exploring the effects of size and luminance of visual targets on the pupillary light reflex. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 183--186. DOI: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2390256.2390287 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sandra P. Marshall, 2002. The Index of Cognitive Activity: measuring cognitive workload. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants. IEEE, 7--5 - 7--9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HFPP.2002.1042860Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Bruce Mehler, Bryan Reimer, Joseph F. Coughlin, and Jeffery A. Dusek. 2009. Impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2138, 1 (2009), 6--12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2138-02Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Bruce Mehler, Bryan Reimer, and Joseph F. Coughlin. 2012. Sensitivity of physiological measures for detecting systematic variations in cognitive demand from a working memory task an on-road study across three age groups. Human Factors 54, 3 (2010), 396--412. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720812442086Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Bruce Mehler, Bryan Reimer and Jeffery A. Dusek. 2011. MIT AgeLab Delayed Digit Recall Task (n-back) Working Paper 2011--3B. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. http://agelab.mit.edu/system/files/Mehler_et_al_n-back-white-paper_2011_B.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. W. Thomas Miller, and Andrew L. Kun. 2013. Using speech, GUIs and buttons in police vehicles: field data on user preferences for the Project54 system. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 108--113. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516564 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. William F. Moroney, David W. Biers, Thomas Eggemeier, and Jennifer A. Mitchell. 1992. A comparison of two scoring procedures with the NASA Task Load Index in a simulated flight task. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1992 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, NAECON 1992. IEEE, 734--740. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1992.220513Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Nesrine Mezhoudi, Iyad Khaddam, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2015. Toward Usable Intelligent User Interface. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII '15), Part II, LNCS 9170, Springer International Publishing, 459--471. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--20916--6_43Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Michael Myrtek, Doris Weber, Georg Brügner, and Wolfgang Müller. 1996. Occupational stress and strain of female students: results of physiological, behavioral, and psychological monitoring. Biological Psychology 42, 3 (Feb. 1996), 379--391. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(95)05168--6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Luis Nunes and Miguel A. Rescarte 2002. Cognitive demands of hands-free-phone conversation while driving. Transportation Research Part F 5, 2 (Jun. 2002), 133--144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369--8478(02)00012--8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Julie Onton, Arnaud Delorme, and Scott Makeig. 2005. Frontal midline EEG dynamics during working memory. NeuroImage 27, 2 (Aug. 2005), 341--356. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Oskar Palinko and Andrew Kun. 2011. Exploring the influence of light and cognitive load on pupil diameter in driving simulator studies. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (Driving Assessment 2011), University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 329--336. http://drivingassessment.uiowa.edu/sites/default/files/DA2011/Papers/048_PalinkoKun.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Oskar Palinko and Andrew Kun. 2012. Exploring the effects of visual cognitive load and illumination on pupil diameter in driving simulators. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '12), ACM, NY, NY, 413--416. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2168556.2168650 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Oskar Palinko, Andrew L. Kun, Alexander Shyrokov, and Peter A. Heeman. 2010. Estimating cognitive load using remote eye tracking in a driving simulator. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '10), ACM, NY, NY, 141--144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1743666.1743701 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Bastian Pfleging and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015. (Non-) Driving-Related Activities in the Car: Defining Driver Activitgies for Manual and Automated Driving. In Workshop on Experiencing Autonomous Vehicles: Crossing the Boundaries between a Drive and a Ride at CHI '15. http://www.hcilab.org/wp-content/uploads/pfleging-2015-drivingrelatedactivities.pdf Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Bastian Pfleging, Stefan Schneegass, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. Exploring user expectations for context and road video sharing while calling and driving. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 132--139. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516547 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Bryan Reimer, Bruce Mehler, Joseph F. Coughlin, Kathryn M. Godfrey, and Chauanzhong Tan. 2009. An on-road assessment of the impact of cognitive workload on physiological arousal in young adult drivers. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Application (AutomotiveUI '09), ACM, NY, NY, 115--118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1620509.1620531 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. A. H. Roscoe. 1992. Assessing pilot workload. Why measure heart rate, HRV and respiration? Biological Psychology 34, 2 (Nov. 1992), 259--287. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(92)90018-PGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Dennis W. Rowe, John Sibert, and Don Irwin. 1998. Heart rate variability: Indicator of user state as an aid to human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '98), ACM, NY, NY, 480--487. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/274644.274709 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Kilseop Ryu and Rohae Myung. 2005. Evaluation of mental workload with a combined measure based on physiological indices during a dual task of tracking and mental arithmetic. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35, 11 (Nov. 2005), 991--1009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.04.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Stefan Schneegass, Bastian Pfleging, Nora Broy, Frederik Heinrich, and Albrecht Schmidt. A data set of real world driving to assess driver workload. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI 2013). ACM, NY, NY, 150--157. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516561 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Erin T. Solovey, Paul Schermerhorn, Matthias Scheutz, Angelo Sassaroli, Sergio Fantini, and Robert J.K. Jacob. 2012. Brainput: Enhancing Interactive Systems with Streaming fNIRS Brain Input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2193--2202. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208372 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Yi-Fang Tsai, Erik Viirre, Christopher Strychacz, Bradley Chase, and Tzyy-Ping Jung. 2007. Task performance and eye activity: Predicting behavior relating to cognitive workload. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 78, 5 (May 2007), B176-B185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Karl F. Van Orden, Wendy Limbert, Scott Makeig, and Tzyy-Ping Jung. 2001. Eye activity correlates of workload during visuospatial memory task. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43, 1 (Spring 2001), 111--121. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872001775992570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Ying Wang, Bryan Reimer, Bruce Mehler, Jun Zhang, Alea Mehler, and Joseph F. Coughlin. 2010. The Impact of Repeated Cognitive Tasks on Driving Performance and Visual Attention. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE '10), Miami, FL, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Yan Yang, Bryan Reimer, Bruce Mehler,and Jonathan Dobres. 2013. A field study assessing driving performance, visual attention, heart rate and subjective ratings in response to two types of cognitive workload. In Proceedings of the 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (Driving Assessment 2013). University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 397--403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Yabo Yang, Keith Thompson, and Stephen A. Burns. 2002. Pupil location under mesopic, photopic, and pharmacologically dilated conditions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 43, 7 (Jul. 2002), 2508--2512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhiwei Zhu, Kikuo Fujimura, and Qiang Ji. 2002. Real-time eye detection and tracking under various light conditions. In Proceedings of the 2002 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA 2002). ACM, NY, NY, 139--144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/507072.507100 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Model Relating Pupil Diameter to Mental Workload and Lighting Conditions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader