skip to main content
10.1145/2876034.2876041acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of In-Video Quizzes on MOOC Lecture Viewing

Published:25 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online courses on sites such as Coursera use quizzes embedded inside lecture videos (in-video quizzes) to help learners test their understanding of the video. This paper analyzes how users interact with in-video quizzes, and how in-video quizzes influence users' lecture viewing behavior. We analyze the viewing logs of users who took the Machine Learning course on Coursera. Users engage heavily with in-video quizzes -- 74% of viewers who start watching a video will attempt its corresponding in-video quiz. We observe spikes in seek activity surrounding in-video quizzes, particularly seeks from the in-video quiz to the preceding section. We show that this is likely due to users reviewing the preceding section to help them answer the quiz, as the majority of users who seek backwards from in-video quizzes have not yet submitted a correct answer, but will later attempt the quiz. Some users appear to use quiz-oriented navigation strategies, such as seeking directly from the start of the video to in-video quizzes, or skipping from one quiz to the next. We discuss implications of our findings on the design of lecture-viewing platforms.

References

  1. Robert Allen. 1998.The Web: interactive and multimedia education. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30, 16 (1998), 1717--1727. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ashton Anderson, Daniel Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg, and Jure Leskovec. 2014.Engaging with massive online courses. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 687--698. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Philip J Guo, Juho Kim, and Rob Rubin. 2014.How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. ACM, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Philip J Guo and Katharina Reinecke. 2014.Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. ACM, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mina C Johnson-Glenberg. 2010.Embedded formative e-assessment: who benefits, who falters. Educational Media International 47, 2 (2010), 153--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Juho Kim, Philip J Guo, Carrie J Cai, Shang-Wen Daniel Li, Krzysztof Z Gajos, and Robert C Miller. 2014a.Data-driven interaction techniques for improving navigation of educational videos. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 563--572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Juho Kim, Philip J Guo, Daniel T Seaton, Piotr Mitros, Krzysztof Z Gajos, and Robert C Miller. 2014b.Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks in online lecture videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@at Scale conference. ACM, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. René F Kizilcec, Chris Piech, and Emily Schneider. 2013.Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. ACM, 170--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Rene F Kizilcec and Emily Schneider. 2015.Motivation as a Lens to Understand Online Learners: Towards Data-Driven Design with the OLEI Scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 22, 2 (2015), 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Henry L Roediger III and Andrew C Butler. 2011.The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in cognitive sciences 15, 1 (2011), 20--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Effects of In-Video Quizzes on MOOC Lecture Viewing

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            L@S '16: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
            April 2016
            446 pages
            ISBN:9781450337267
            DOI:10.1145/2876034

            Copyright © 2016 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 April 2016

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            L@S '16 Paper Acceptance Rate18of79submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate117of440submissions,27%

            Upcoming Conference

            L@S '24
            Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
            July 18 - 20, 2024
            Atlanta , GA , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader