skip to main content
10.1145/2899007.2899009acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesasia-ccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mind The Plug! Laptop-User Recognition Through Power Consumption

Published:30 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm, in conjunction with the one of smart cities, is pursuing toward the concept of smart buildings, i.e., ``intelligent'' buildings able to receive data from a network of sensors and thus to adapt the environment. IoT sensors can monitor a wide range of environmental features such as the energy consumption inside a building at fine-grained level (e.g., for a specific wall-socket). Some smart buildings already deploy energy monitoring in order to optimize the energy use for good purposes (e.g., to save money, to reduce pollution). Unfortunately, such measurements raise a significant amount of privacy concerns.

In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of recognizing the pair laptop-user (i.e., a user using her own laptop) from the energy traces produced by her laptop. We design MTPlug, a framework that achieves this goal relying on supervised machine learning techniques as pattern recognition in multivariate time series. We present a comprehensive implementation of this system and run a thorough set of experiments. In particular, we collected data by monitoring the energy consumption of two groups of laptop users, some office employees and some intruders, for a total of 27 people. We show that our system is able to build an energy profile for a laptop user with accuracy above 80%, in less than 3.5 hours of laptop usage. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first research that assesses the feasibility of laptop users profiling relying uniquely on fine-grained energy traces collected using wall-socket smart meters.

References

  1. J. Abonyi, B. Feil, S. Nemeth, and P. Arva. Principal component analysis based time series - segmentation application to hierarchical clustering for multivariate process data. In Proc. of IEEE ICCC, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Akbar, M. Nati, F. Carrez, and K. Moessner. Contextual Occupancy Detection for Smart Office by Pattern Recognition of Electricity Consumption Data. http://iot-cosmos.eu/node/1566, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Ambrosin, H. Hosseini, K. Mandal, M. Conti, and R. Poovendran. Verifiable and privacy-preserving fine-grained data-collection for smart metering. In Communications and Network Security (CNS), 2015 IEEE Conference on, pages 655--658. IEEE, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. Basseville, I. V. Nikiforov, et al. Detection of abrupt changes: theory and application, volume 104. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. M. Bishop. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. S. Clark, H. Mustafa, B. Ransford, J. Sorber, K. Fu, and W. Xu. Current events: Identifying webpages by tapping the electrical outlet. In Computer Security-ESORICS 2013, pages 700--717. Springer, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Conti, L. Mancini, R. Spolaor, and N. V. Verde. Analyzing android encrypted network traffic to identify user actions. TIFS, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. T. Do, S. Rawshdeh, and W. Shi. ptop: A process-level power profiling tool. In Proc. of HotPower. USENIX, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Ebadat, G. Bottegal, D. Varagnolo, B. Wahlberg, and K. H. Johansson. Estimation of building occupancy levels through environmental signals deconvolution. In Proc. of ACM BuildSys, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. Efthymiou and G. Kalogridis. Smart grid privacy via anonymization of smart metering data. In Proc. of IEEE SmartGridComm, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. D. Genkin, I. Pipman, and E. Tromer. Get your hands off my laptop: Physical side-channel key-extraction attacks on pcs. Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, 5(2):95--112, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. G. W. Hart. Nonintrusive appliance load monitoring. Proc. of the IEEE, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Jawurek, M. Johns, and K. Rieck. Smart metering de-pseudonymization. In Proc. of ACM ACSAC, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. X. Jiang, S. Dawson-Haggerty, P. Dutta, and D. Culler. Design and implementation of a high-fidelity ac metering network. In Proc. of IPSN, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. Kalogridis, C. Efthymiou, S. Z. Denic, T. A. Lewis, and R. Cepeda. Privacy for smart meters: Towards undetectable appliance load signatures. In Proc. of IEEE SmartGridComm, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. E. Keogh, S. Chu, D. Hart, and M. Pazzani. An online algorithm for segmenting time series. In Proc. of IEEE ICDM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. W. Kleiminger, C. Beckel, T. Staake, and S. Santini. Occupancy detection from electricity consumption data. In Proc. of ACM BuildSys, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Liang, S. K. Ng, G. Kendall, and J. W. Cheng. Load signature study - part ii: Disaggregation framework, simulation, and applications. PWRD, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. Lifton, M. Feldmeier, Y. Ono, C. Lewis, J. Paradiso, et al. A platform for ubiquitous sensor deployment in occupational and domestic environments. In Proc. of IEEE IPSN, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. G.-y. Lin, S.-c. Lee, and J. Y.-j. Hsu. Sensing from the panel: Applying the power meters for appliance recognition. In Proc. of AIAI. Springer, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. McIntire, T. Stathopoulos, and W. Kaiser. etop-sensor network application energy profiling on the leap2 platform. In Proc. of IEEE IPSN, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Nati, A. Gluhak, H. Abangar, and W. Headley. Smartcampus: A user-centric testbed for internet of things experimentation. In Proc. of IEEE WPMC, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. G. Procaccianti, L. Ardito, M. Morisio, et al. Profiling power consumption on desktop computer systems. In ICT-GLOW. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. E. L. Quinn. Smart metering and privacy: Existing laws and competing policies. Available at SSRN 1462285, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. L. Rashidi, S. Rajasegarar, C. Leckie, M. Nati, A. Gluhak, M. A. Imran, and M. Palaniswami. Profiling spatial and temporal behaviour in sensor networks: A case study in energy monitoring. In Proc. of IEEE ISSNIP, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. A. Reinhardt, P. Baumann, D. Burgstahler, M. Hollick, H. Chonov, M. Werner, and R. Steinmetz. On the accuracy of appliance identification based on distributed load metering data. In Proc. of IEEE SustainIT, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A. Ridi and J. Hennebert. Hidden markov models for ilm appliance identification. Procedia Computer Science, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. A. Savitzky and M. J. Golay. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical chemistry.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. M. Shinohara, M. Murakami, H. Iwane, S. Takahashi, S. Yamane, H. Anai, T. Sonoda, and N. Yugami. Development of an integrated control system using notebook pc batteries for reducing peak power demand. International Journal of Informatics Society, 5(3):109--118, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. S. Spiegel, J. Gaebler, A. Lommatzsch, E. De Luca, and S. Albayrak. Pattern recognition and classification for multivariate time series. In Proc. of ACM Sensor-KDD, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. A. Zoha, A. Gluhak, M. A. Imran, and S. Rajasegarar. Non-intrusive load monitoring approaches for disaggregated energy sensing: A survey. Sensors, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. A. Zoha, A. Gluhak, M. Nati, and M. A. Imran. Low-power appliance monitoring using factorial hidden markov models. In Proc. of IEEE ISSNIP, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Mind The Plug! Laptop-User Recognition Through Power Consumption

                      Recommendations

                      Comments

                      Login options

                      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                      Sign in
                      • Published in

                        cover image ACM Conferences
                        IoTPTS '16: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on IoT Privacy, Trust, and Security
                        May 2016
                        54 pages
                        ISBN:9781450342834
                        DOI:10.1145/2899007

                        Copyright © 2016 ACM

                        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                        Publisher

                        Association for Computing Machinery

                        New York, NY, United States

                        Publication History

                        • Published: 30 May 2016

                        Permissions

                        Request permissions about this article.

                        Request Permissions

                        Check for updates

                        Qualifiers

                        • research-article

                        Acceptance Rates

                        IoTPTS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate6of12submissions,50%Overall Acceptance Rate16of39submissions,41%

                      PDF Format

                      View or Download as a PDF file.

                      PDF

                      eReader

                      View online with eReader.

                      eReader