skip to main content
10.1145/2899415.2899455acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigating Factors Influencing Students' Intention to Dropout Computer Science Studies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research in the area of Computer Science (CS) education, has focused on identifying the reasons that students do not finish their studies in CS. Although there is increasing demand for CS professionals, there is not enough knowledge to explain the high dropout rates in CS education. This study aims to empirically examine how students' intention to complete their studies (retention) in CS is affected by variables playing a key role in higher education. By identifying which variables contribute to dropout in CS studies, we will be able to focus on how to improve aspects related with them in order to reduce dropout rates. To do so we identified the following variables: Year of studies, Gender, Age, Students' Effort, Absence from Classes, Expected Grade point average (GPA), and Current GPA, and tested their effect on retention, based on the responses collected from 241 CS student. Year of studies and Effort have positive effects on students' intention to finish their studies in CS. Interestingly, the expected GPA has a negative effect on students' intentions to finish their studies. The findings contribute to theory and practice, as they offer CS educators and policy makers insights that may aid towards increased student retention and reduced dropout rates.

References

  1. Zweben, S. and Bizot, B., 2015. CRA Taulbee Survey Report 2014: Relentless Growth in Undergraduate CS Enrollment; Doctoral Degree Production Remains Strong but No New Record. Computing Research News.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Giannakos, M.N., Doukakis, S., Pappas, I.O., Adamopoulos, N., and Giannopoulou, P., 2015. Investigating teachers' confidence on technological pedagogical and content knowledge: an initial validation of TPACK scales in K-12 computing education context. Journal of Computers in Education 2, 1, 43--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Wilson, Z.S., Holmes, L., Sylvain, M.R., Batiste, L., Johnson, M., McGuire, S.Y., Pang, S.S., and Warner, I.M., 2012. Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate STEM disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology 21, 1, 148--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), 2010. Employment Projections 2010--2020, available at http://www.bls.gov/emp/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. European Commission, 2015. Skills & Jobs. Retrieved 23 Dec. by: http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/skills-jobsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ICT Skills Action Plan 2014--2018, 2014. Government, Education and Industry working together to make Ireland a global leader in ICT talent, retrieved 19 Feb. by: http://cork.etb.ie/wpcontent/uploads/sites/20/2014/08/14042014-ICT_Skills_Action_Plan-Publication.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohoon, J., 2006. Just get over it or just get on with it. Retaining women in undergraduate computing. In J. Cohoon & W. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation, 205--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Doll, J.J., Eslami, Z., and Walters, L., 2013. Understanding why students drop out of high school, according to their own reports. Sage Open 3, 4, 2158244013503834.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Gramling, T., 2013. How five student characteristics accurately predict for-profit university graduation odds. SAGE Open 3, 3, 2158244013497026.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M., and Sinha, H., 2011. Orientation of undergraduates toward careers in the computer and information sciences: Gender, self-efficacy and social support. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 11, 3, 14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Xenos, M., Pierrakeas, C., and Pintelas, P., 2002. A survey on student dropout rates and dropout causes concerning the students in the Course of Informatics of the Hellenic Open University. Computers & Education 39, 4, 361--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Barker, L., Hovey, C.L., and Thompson, L.D., 2014. Results of a large-scale, multi-institutional study of undergraduate retention in computing. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2014 IEEE IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Biggers, M., Brauer, A., and Yilmaz, T., 2008. Student perceptions of computer science: a retention study comparing graduating seniors with cs leavers. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin ACM, 402--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Huang, P.M. and Brainard, S.G., 2001. Identifying determinants of academic selfconfidence among science, math, engineering, and technology students. Journal of women and minorities in science and engineering 7, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ohland, M.W., Sheppard, S.D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., and Layton, R.A., 2008. Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education 97, 3, 259--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Seymour, E., 2000. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. ACM/IEEE Computing Curricula Task Force, 2013. Computer science curricula 2013: Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in computer science. Technical report, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) IEEE Computer Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Barker, L.J., McDowell, C., and Kalahar, K., 2009. Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin ACM, 153--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Carter, L., 2006. Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 38, 1, 27--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jacobs, J.E., 2005. Twenty-five years of research on gender and ethnic differences in math and science career choices: What have we learned? New directions for child and adolescent development 2005, 110, 85--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Araque, F., Roldán, C., and Salguero, A., 2009. Factors influencing university drop out rates. Computers & Education 53, 3, 563--574. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mau, W.C., 2003. Factors that influence persistence in science and engineering career aspirations. The Career Development Quarterly 51, 3, 234--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Arulampalam, W., Naylor, R.A., and Smith, J., 2012. Am I missing something? The effects of absence from class on student performance. Economics of Education Review 31, 4, 363--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Yu, T. and Jo, I.-H., 2014. Educational technology approach toward learning analytics: Relationship between student online behavior and learning performance in higher education. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge ACM, 269--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ruxton, G.D., 2006. The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Behavioral Ecology 17, 4, 688--690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Cronbach, L.J., 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika 16, 3, 297--334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hair, J., Tatham, R., Anderson, R., and Black, W., 2006. Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6): Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Investigating Factors Influencing Students' Intention to Dropout Computer Science Studies

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ITiCSE '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
        July 2016
        394 pages
        ISBN:9781450342315
        DOI:10.1145/2899415

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 July 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ITiCSE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate56of147submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

        Upcoming Conference

        ITiCSE 2024

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader