skip to main content
10.1145/2930238.2930252acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User-Oriented Context Suggestion

Published:13 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommender systems have been used in many domains to assist users' decision making by providing item recommendations and thereby reducing information overload. Context-aware recommender systems go further, incorporating the variability of users' preferences across contexts, and suggesting items that are appropriate in different contexts. In this paper, we present a novel recommendation task, "Context Suggestion", whereby the system recommends contexts in which items may be selected. We introduce the motivations behind the notion of context suggestion and discuss several potential solutions. In particular, we focus specifically on user-oriented context suggestion which involves recommending appropriate contexts based on a user's profile. We propose extensions of well-known context-aware recommendation algorithms such as tensor factorization and deviation-based contextual modeling and adapt them as methods to recommend contexts instead of items. In our empirical evaluation, we compare the proposed solutions to several baseline algorithms using four real-world data sets.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius, B. Mobasher, F. Ricci, and A. Tuzhilin. Context-aware recommender systems. AI Magazine, 32(3):67--80, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Tutorial on Context-aware Recommender Systems, the 2nd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. http://ids.csom.umn.edu/faculty/gedas/talks/RecSys2008-tutorial.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Baltrunas, K. Church, A. Karatzoglou, and N. Oliver. Frappe: Understanding the usage and perception of mobile app recommendations in-the-wild. CoRR, abs/1505.03014, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. L. Baltrunas, M. Kaminskas, B. Ludwig, O. Moling, F. Ricci, A. Aydin, K.-H. Lüke, and R. Schwaiger. Incarmusic: Context-aware music recommendations in a car. In E-Commerce and Web Technologies, pages 89--100. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. L. Baltrunas, M. Kaminskas, F. Ricci, R. Lior, B. Shapira, and K.-H. Luke. Best usage context predictions for music tracks. In The 2nd Workshop on Context-aware Recommender Systems, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. L. Baltrunas, B. Ludwig, and F. Ricci. Matrix factorization techniques for context aware recommendation. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 301--304. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Baltrunas and F. Ricci. Experimental evaluation of context-dependent collaborative filtering using item splitting. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 24(1--2):7--34, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. V. Bellotti, B. Begole, E. H. Chi, N. Ducheneaut, J. Fang, E. Isaacs, T. King, M. W. Newman, K. Partridge, B. Price, et al. Activity-based serendipitous recommendations with the magitti mobile leisure guide. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1157--1166. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. V. Codina, F. Ricci, and L. Ceccaroni. Exploiting the semantic similarity of contextual situations for pre-filtering recommendation. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pages 165--177. Springer, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. K. Dey. Understanding and using context. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 5(1):4--7, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Jarvelin and J. Kekalainen. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 20(4):422--446, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Karatzoglou, X. Amatriain, L. Baltrunas, and N. Oliver. Multiverse recommendation: n-dimensional tensor factorization for context-aware collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 79--86. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Computer, 42(8):30--37, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Kosir, A. Odic, M. Kunaver, M. Tkalcic, and J. F. Tasic. Database for contextual personalization. ELEKTROTEHNISKI VESTNIK, 78(5):270--274, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Liaw and M. Wiener. Classification and regression by randomforest. R news, 2(3):18--22, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. X. Ning and G. Karypis. SLIM: Sparse linear methods for top-n recommender systems. In IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining, pages 497--506. IEEE, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Odic, M. Tkalcic, J. F. Tasic, and A. Kosir. Relevant context in a movie recommender system: Users' opinion vs. statistical detection. ACM RecSys Workshop on Context-aware Recommender Systems, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. X. Ramirez-Garcia and M. Garca-Valdez. Post-filtering for a restaurant context-aware recommender system. In Recent Advances on Hybrid Approaches for Designing Intelligent Systems, volume 547 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, pages 695--707. Springer International Publishing, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. S. Rendle and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 81--90. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. G. Tsoumakas, I. Katakis, and I. Vlahavas. Mining multi-label data. In Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook, pages 667--685. Springer, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. G. Tsoumakas and I. Vlahavas. Random k-labelsets: An ensemble method for multilabel classification. In Machine learning: ECML 2007, pages 406--417. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. E. M. Voorhees et al. The trec-8 question answering track report. In Trec, volume 99, pages 77--82, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Y. Zheng. Context suggestion: Solutions and challenges. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, pages 1602--1603. IEEE, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Y. Zheng. A revisit to the identification of contexts in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion, pages 133--136. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Y. Zheng. Context-driven mobile apps management and recommendation. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 633--634. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Y. Zheng, R. Burke, and B. Mobasher. Recommendation with differential context weighting. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pages 152--164. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Y. Zheng, R. Burke, and B. Mobasher. Splitting approaches for context-aware recommendation: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 274--279. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Y. Zheng, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Context recommendation using multi-label classification. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, pages 288--295. IEEE/WIC/ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Y. Zheng, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. CSLIM: Contextual SLIM recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 301--304. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Y. Zheng, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Deviation-based contextual SLIM recommenders. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 271--280. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Y. Zheng, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. CARSKit: A java-based context-aware recommendation engine. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, pages 1668--1671. IEEE, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Y. Zheng, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Integrating context similarity with sparse linear recommendation model. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, volume 9146 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 370--376. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Y. Zheng, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Similarity-based context-aware recommendation. In Web Information Systems Engineering, volume 9418 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 431--447. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. User-Oriented Context Suggestion

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UMAP '16: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization
        July 2016
        366 pages
        ISBN:9781450343688
        DOI:10.1145/2930238

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 July 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        UMAP '16 Paper Acceptance Rate21of123submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate162of633submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader