skip to main content
10.1145/2939672.2945384acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Collective Sensemaking via Social Sensors: Extracting, Profiling, Analyzing, and Predicting Real-world Events

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 August 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook have emerged as some of the most important platforms for people to discover, report, share, and communicate with others about various public events, be they of global or local interest (some high profile examples include the U.S Presidential debates, the Boston bombings, the hurricane Sandy, etc). The burst of social media reaction can be seen as a valuable real-time reflection of events as they happen, and can be used for a variety of applications such as computational journalism. Until now, such analysis has been mostly done manually or through primitive tools. Scalable and automated approaches are needed given the massive amounts of both event and reaction information. These approaches must also be able to conduct in-depth analysis of complex interactions between an event and its audience. Supporting such automation and examination however poses several computational challenges. In recent years, research communities have witnessed a growing interest in tackling these challenges. Furthermore, much recent research has begun to focus on solving more complex event analytics tasks such as post-event effect quantification and event progress prediction. This tutorial aims to review and examine current state of the research progress on this emerging topic.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

kdd2016_tutorial_social_sensors_01-acm.mp4

mp4

740.6 MB

kdd2016_tutorial_social_sensors_02-acm.mp4

mp4

1.1 GB

kdd2016_tutorial_social_sensors_03-acm.mp4

mp4

1.4 GB

References

  1. H. Becker, M. Naaman, and L. Gravano. Beyond trending topics: Real-world event identi cation on twitter. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Castillo, M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete. Information credibility on twitter. In WWW. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Duan, D. Xu, I.-H. Tsang, and J. Luo. Visual event recognition in videos by learning from web data. PAMI, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Hu, S. D. Farnham, and A. Monroy-Hernandez. Whoo.ly: facilitating information seeking for hyperlocal communities using social media. In CHI. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Hu, A. John, D. D. Seligmann, and F. Wang. What were the tweets about? topical associations between public events and twitter feeds. In ICWSM, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Y. Hu, A. John, F. Wang, and S. Kambhampati. Et-lda: Joint topic modeling for aligning events and their twitter feedback. In AAAI, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Y. Hu, F. Wang, and S. Kambhampati. Listening to the crowd: Automated analysis of events via aggregated twitter sentiment. In IJCAI, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Y.-R. Lin, D. Margolin, B. Keegan, A. Baronchelli, and D. Lazer. # bigbirds never die: Understanding social dynamics of emergent hashtag. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Y.-R. Lin, D. Margolin, B. Keegan, and D. Lazer. Voices of victory: A computational focus group framework for tracking opinion shift in real time. In WWW, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Nichols, J. Mahmud, and C. Drews. Summarizing sporting events using twitter. In IUI, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A.-M. Popescu, M. Pennacchiotti, and D. Paranjpe. Extracting events and event descriptions from twitter. In WWW. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Ritter, O. Etzioni, S. Clark, et al. Open domain event extraction from twitter. In KDD, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In WWW, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Shamma, L. Kennedy, and E. Churchill. Tweetgeist: Can the twitter timeline reveal the structure of broadcast events. CSCW, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Q. You and J. Luo. Towards social imagematics: sentiment analysis in social multimedia. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Yuan, Q. You, and J. Luo. Are there cultural di erences in event driven information propagation over social media? In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Socially-aware multimedia, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Collective Sensemaking via Social Sensors: Extracting, Profiling, Analyzing, and Predicting Real-world Events

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '16: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
      August 2016
      2176 pages
      ISBN:9781450342322
      DOI:10.1145/2939672

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 August 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '16 Paper Acceptance Rate66of1,115submissions,6%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader