skip to main content
10.1145/2940299.2940300acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Co-design in the wild: a case study on meme creation tools

Published:15 August 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The internet meme has become a vital form of self-expression in social communities throughout the Internet. The tools facilitating meme-creation, specifically image macros, have been little-studied but endow non-technical users with the ability to create the multi-layered graphics typical to such memes. The use of these creativity tools provides a unique setting in which to explore the concept of co-design, wherein tools are shaped in response to emergent user needs. Users and designers of meme-creation tools have evolved ways of collaborating and communicating over time, in a fully naturalistic setting. This study explores these processes through survey and interviews of tool designer/developers and an analysis of users' design ideas generated over time. The study finds that, while co-design may be commonly practiced today, these activities raise numerous challenges to participatory design, including: creating trust between designers and users, managing unwieldy system growth, and supporting features specific to aspiring end-user crafters.

References

  1. AdviceAnimals. 2015. Retrieved July 6, 2015 from https://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ani, B., Bietz, M., Wang, Y., Trainer, E., Koehne, B., Marczak, S., Redmiles, D., and Prikladnicki, R. 2013. Globally Distributed System Developers: Their Trust Expectations and Processes. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 563--574. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441840 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bauckhage, C. 2011. Insights into Internet Memes. In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-11), 42--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., and Hillgren, P. 2010. Participatory design and "democratizing innovation". In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41--50. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900448 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Björgvinsson, E. and Hillgren, P.-A. 2002. Readymade design at an intensive care unit. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC '02), 221--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackmore, S. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Börzsei, L. K. 2013. Makes a Meme Instead: A Concise History of Internet Memes. New Media Studies Magazine. 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Coscia, M. 2013. Competition and success in the meme pool: a case study on quickmeme.com. In Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-13), 100--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Davison, P. 2012. The language of internet memes. In The social media reader, M. Mandiberg (ed.). New York University Press, New York, NY, USA, 120--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dittrich, Y., Eriksén, S., and Hansson, C. 2002. PD in the Wild; Evolving Practices of Design in Use. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC 2002), 124--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dittrich, Y., Eriksén, S., and Wessels, B. 2014. Learning Through Situated Innovation: Why the specific is crucial for participatory design research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems. 26, 1, 29--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehn, P. 1989. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Fischer, G. and Giaccardi, E. 2006. Meta-Design: A Framework for the Future of End User Development. In H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, & V. Wulf (Eds.), End User Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 427--457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer, G. and Hermann, T. 2011. Socio-Technical Systems - A Meta-Design Perspective. International Journal for Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development. 3, 1, 1--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fischer, G., McCall, R., Ostwald, J., Reeves, B. and Shipman, F. 1994. Seeding, evolutionary growth and reseeding: supporting the incremental development of design environments. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94). ACM, New York, NY, 292--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Fleron, B., Rasmussen, R., Simonsen, J. and Hertzum, M. 2012. User Participation in Implementation. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference (PDC '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61--64. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2348144.2348164 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Følstad, A. 2008. Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review. Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks. 10, 7, 99--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gantt, M. and Nardi, B. A. 1992. Gardeners and gurus: patterns of cooperation among CAD users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 107--117. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/142750.142767 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M., eds. 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. GitHub, Inc. About Github. 2015. Retrieved July 23, 2015 from https://github.com/aboutGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagen, P. and Robertson, T. 2010. Social technologies: challenges and opportunities for participation. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--40. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900447 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Henderson, A. and Kyng, M. 1992. There's no place like home: continuing design in use. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (eds.), Design at work, L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 219--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hess, J., Randall, D., Pipek, V., and Wulf, V. 2013. Involving users in the wild -- Participatory product development in and with online communities. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 71, 5, 570--589. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Illich, I. 1973. Tools for Conviviality. Harper & Row Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. University Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Leskovec, J., Backstrom, L., and Kleinberg, J. 2009. Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 497--506. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1557019.1557077 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Löwgren, J., & Reimer, B. 2013. Collaborative media: production, consumption, and design interventions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Löwgren, J., & Reimer, B. 2012. Designing collaborative media: a challenge for CHI? In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--40. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212781 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Marcolin, M., D'Andrea, V. and Hakken, D. 2012. Participatory maintenance-in-use: users' role in keeping systems alive. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conferenc (PDC '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57--60. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2348144.2348162 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Meme Dad. Socially Awkward Penguin. 2015. Retrieved September 2, 2015 from http://memedad.com/generate/118Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Muller, M. J. 2002. Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In J. A. Jacko and A. Sears (eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook, L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1051--1068. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Olson, G. M. and Olson, J. S. 2000. Distance matters. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 15, 2 (September 2000), 139--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Robertson, G. Quickmeme banned from Reddit for alleged vote manipulation. 2013. Retrieved August 1, 2015 from http://www.dailydot.com/news/reddit-bans-quickmemevote-manipulation/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sanders, E. and Stappers, P. J. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. 4, 1, 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Shirky, C. 2010. Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. The Penguin Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Spinuzzi, C. 2005. The Methodology of Participatory Design. Tech. Commun. 52, 2, 163--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Stålbröst, A. 2008. Forming future IT: the living lab way of user involvement. Ph.D Dissertation. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. von Hippel, E. 2005. The Democratization of Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Wiggins, B. E. and Bowers, G. B. 2014. Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape. New Media Soc. 17, 11, 1886--1906. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535194Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Co-design in the wild: a case study on meme creation tools

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PDC '16: Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 1
      August 2016
      192 pages
      ISBN:9781450340465
      DOI:10.1145/2940299

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 August 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader