skip to main content
10.1145/2982142.2982198acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Deaf and Hard of Hearing Individuals' Perceptions of Communication with Hearing Colleagues in Small Groups

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This survey-based study investigated deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) individuals' perceived need for technologies that may facilitate communication when meeting in small groups with hearing colleagues. Participants were 108 DHH postsecondary students who participated in co-op (internship) and capstone experiences at workplaces with hearing employees within the past two years. Participants' responses to a survey indicated that they were generally not satisfied with their current strategies and technologies for communicating with hearing persons in small groups.

References

  1. Yashesh Gaur, Florian Metze, Yajie Miao, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2015. Using Keyword Spotting to Help Humans Correct Captioning Faster. In Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hernisa Kacorri, Matt Huenerfauth, Sarah Ebling, Kasmira Patel, and Mackenzie Willard. 2015. Demographic and Experiential Factors Influencing Acceptance of Sign Language Animation by Deaf Users. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 147--154. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809860 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Marc Marschark, Greg Leigh, Patricia Sapere, Denis Burnham, Carol Convertino, Michael Stinson, Harry Knoors, Mathijs PJ Vervloed, and William Noble. 2006. Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education 11, 4 (2006), 421--437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Soraia Silva Prietch, Napoliana Silva de Souza, and Lucia Villela Leite Filgueiras. 2014. A Speech-To-Text System's Acceptance Evaluation: Would Deaf Individuals Adopt This Technology in Their Lives' Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design and Development Methods for Universal Access (2014), 440--449.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jessica J. Tran, Eve A. Riskin, Richard E. Ladner, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2015. Evaluating Intelligibility and Battery Drain of Mobile Sign Language Video Transmitted at Low Frame Rates and Bit Rates. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 7, 3, Article 11 (November 2015), 26 pages. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/27971 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mike Wald. 2005. Using automatic speech recognition to enhance education for all students: Turning a vision into reality. In Frontiers in Education, IEEE FIE'05. Proceedings 35th Annual Conference. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1612286Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Deaf and Hard of Hearing Individuals' Perceptions of Communication with Hearing Colleagues in Small Groups

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASSETS '16: Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
        October 2016
        362 pages
        ISBN:9781450341240
        DOI:10.1145/2982142

        Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 October 2016

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        ASSETS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate24of95submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader