Jean-François Bousquet
ABSTRACT
In this work, a bi-directional transceiver with a maximum throughput of 24 kbps is presented. The spatio-temporal shallow water channel characteristics between a projector and a hydrophone array are analyzed in a seawater tank, and a methodology to maintain a 10−4 probability of bit error with prior knowledge of the channel statistics is proposed. Also, it is found that flow generated in the sea water provides a realistic representation of time-varying propagation conditions, particularly for the reverse link communication link at 22.5 kHz.
- M. Chitre. A high-frequency warm shallow water acoustic communications channel model and measurements. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(5):2580--2586, 2007.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- E. Demirors, G. Sklivanitis, T. Melodia, S. N. Batalama, and D. A. Pados. Software-defined underwater acoustic networks: toward a high-rate real-time reconfigurable modem. IEEE Commun. Mag., 53(11):64--71, November 2015.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Diamant, A. Feuer, and L. Lutz. Choosing the right signal: Doppler shift estimation for underwater acoustic signals. In Intl. Conf. UnderWater Networks Syst., volume 1, pages pp. 1--8, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Diamant and L. Lampe. Spatial reuse time-division multiple access for broadcast ad hoc underwater acoustic communication networks. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 36(2):172--185, April 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. N. Didenkulov, S.-W. Yoon, E.-J. Kim, and A. M. Sutin. Nonlinear acoustic doppler effect in a bubble flow. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(4):2514--2529, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. E. Freitag, M. Grund, J. Partan, K. Ball, S. Singh, and P. Koski. Multi-band acoustic modem for the communications and navigation aid AUV. In Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE, pages 1080--1085 Vol. 2, Sept 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. M. Goodfellow, J. A. Neasham, C. C. Tsimenidis, O. R. Hinton, and B. S. Sharif. Investigation of a full duplex acoustic link for a tetherless micro-ROV. In OCEANS 2011 IEEE - Spain, pages 1--7, June 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Jensen, W. Kuperman, M. Porter, and H. Schmidt. Computational Ocean Acoustics. American Inst. of Physics, 2000.Google Scholar
- B. Katsnelson, V. Petnikov, and J. Lynch. Fundamentals of Shallow Water Acoustics. Springer New York, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. McIntyre, J.-F. Bousquet, and J. Quirion. Time-Variant Acoustic Propagation Characterization in Seaport Deployments. In 2015 28th Cdn. Conf. Elect. Comput. Eng., pages 1 --4, May 2015.Google Scholar
- N. Nowsheen, C. Benson, and M. Frater. A high data-rate, software-defined underwater acoustic modem. In OCEANS 2010, pages 1--5, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Pompili and I. F. Akyildiz. Overview of networking protocols for underwater wireless communications. IEEE Commun. Mag., 47(1):97--102, January 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Preisig. Acoustic propagation considerations for underwater acoustic communications network development. In Proc. ACM WUWNet, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. C. Preisig and G. B. Deane. Surface wave focusing and acoustic communications in the surf zone. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4):2067--2080, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Proakis. Digital communications. McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2001.Google Scholar
- P. Qarabaqi and M. Stojanovic. Statistical characterization and computationally efficient modeling of a class of underwater acoustic communication channels. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 38(4):701--717, Oct 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Qu, Z. Wang, L. Yang, and Z. Wu. A journey toward modeling and resolving doppler in underwater acoustic communications. IEEE Commun. Mag., 54(2):49--55, February 2016.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Radosevic, R. Ahmed, T. M. Duman, J. G. Proakis, and M. Stojanovic. Adaptive OFDM Modulation for Underwater Acoustic Communications: Design Considerations and Experimental Results. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 39(2):357--370, April 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Rouseff et al. Coherence of acoustic modes propagating through shallow water internal waves. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(4):1655--1666, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Sarkar and A. Prosperetti. Backscattering of underwater noise by bubble clouds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(6):3128--3138, 1993.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Siderius and M. B. Porter. Modeling broadband ocean acoustic transmissions with time-varying sea surfaces. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(1):137--150, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Stefanov and M. Stojanovic. Design and performance analysis of underwater acoustic networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 29(10):2012--2021, December 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Stojanovic. On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks, WUWNet '06, pages 41--47, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Stojanovic and L. Freitag. Multichannel Detection for Wideband Underwater Acoustic CDMA Communications. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 31(3):685--695, July 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Stojanovic and J. Preisig. Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(1):84--89, January 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. van Walree and R. Otnes. Ultrawideband underwater acoustic communication channels. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 38(4):678--688, Oct 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Performance Analysis of Adaptive Modulation for Precoded MIMO Systems with a GMD Zero-Forcing Transceiver
Geometric mean decomposition (GMD) has emerged as an alternative method to design multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) transceivers. The MIMO-GMD scheme decouples the MIMO channel into multiple independent links with identical gains. The GMD-based ...
Performance analysis of LDPC codes over shallow water acoustic channels
WiCOM'09: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Wireless communications, networking and mobile computingThe major obstacle to shallow water acoustic communication is the interference of multipath signal results from surface and bottom reflections. Channel coding is indispensable in practical system to accommodate these adverse channel transmission ...
Low complexity iterative receiver design for shallow water acoustic channels
Special issue on advances in signal processing for maritime applicationsAn adaptive iterative receiver structure for the shallow underwater acoustic channel (UAC) is proposed using a decision feedback equalizer (DFE) and employing bit-interleaved coded modulation with iterative decoding (BICM-ID) in conjunction with ...
Comments