skip to main content
10.1145/3007669.3007692acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Recommending Followees Based on Content Weighted User Interest Homophily

Published:19 August 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We study the problem of recommending followees to users on content curation social networks (CCSNs). Different from existing friendship-oriented user recommendation approaches, we exploit user interest homophily to recommend users of similar interests, combining the users' social network as well as their topical interests. We first profile users with social links and topical interests derived from "re-pin paths". We further design a collaborative filtering strategy for user recommendation based on interest homophily. Experiments on a content curation social network show that our recommendation algorithm based on user interest homophily performs better than recommendation based on user popularity.

References

  1. M. G. Armentano, D. Godoy, and A. Amandi. Topology-based recommendation of users in micro-blogging communities. Journal of Computer Science & Technology, 27(3):624--634, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. C. Bernardini, T. Silverston, and O. Festor. A pin is worth a thousand words: Characterization of publications in pinterest. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, pages 322--327, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. Billsus and M. J. Pazzani. Learning collaborative information filters. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 46--54, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. S. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, pages 43--52, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Canny. Collaborative filtering with privacy via factor analysis. In Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 238--245, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Chang, V. Kumar, E. Gilbert, and L. Terveen. Specialization, homophily, and gender in a social curation site: findings from pinterest. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, pages 674--686, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Chen, W. Geyer, C. Dugan, M. Muller, and I. Guy. Make new friends, but keep the old: recommending people on social networking sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 201--210, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Gilbert, S. Bakhshi, S. Chang, and L. Terveen. I need to try this?: a statistical overview of pinterest. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 2427--2436, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. I. Guy, I. Ronen, and E. Wilcox. Do you know?: recommending people to invite into your social network. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 77--86, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. Hall and M. Zarro. Social curation on the website pinterest.com. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 49(1):1--9, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Hannon, M. Bennett, and B. Smyth. Recommending twitter users to follow using content and collaborative filtering approaches. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 199--206, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Hannon, K. McCarthy, and B. Smyth. Finding useful users on twitter: Twittomender the followee recommender. In Proceedings of the 33rd European conference on Advances in information retrieval, pages 784--787, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Hofmann and J. Puzicha. Latent class models for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 688--693, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Jing, L. Wu, X. Zhang, D. Wang, and C. Chen. Recommending users to follow based on user taste homophily for content curation social networks. In 2015 ACM SIGKDD Social Recommender System Workshop, Sydney, Australia, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Y. Kamath, A.-M. Popescu, and J. Caverlee. Board recommendation in pinterest. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Y. Kim and K. Shim. Twitobi: A recommendation system for twitter using probabilistic modeling. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining, pages 340--349, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y. Koren. Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 426--434, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Liu, C. Lu, and K. Mohan. Pinterest analysis and recommendations. Course report. Stanford University, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1):415--444, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. R. Ottoni, D. L. Casas, J. P. Pesce, W. Meira Jr., C. Wilson, A. Mislove, and V. Almeida. Of pins and tweets: Investigating how users behave across image- and text-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, page 344, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. R. Ottoni, J. P. Pesce, D. L. Casas, G. Franciscani Jr., W. Meira Jr., P. Kumaraguru, and V. Almeida. Ladies first: Analyzing gender roles and behaviors in pinterest. In Proceedings of the 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D. M. Pennock, E. J. Horvitz, S. Lawrence, and C. L. Giles. Collaborative filtering by personality diagnosis: A hybrid memory- and model-based approach. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 473--480, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. P. Resnick, N. Iacovou, M. Suchak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Riedl. Grouplens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 175--186, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. M. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. A. Konstan, and J. T. Riedl. Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender system - a case study. In ACM WebKDD Workshop, pages 82--90, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. J. Stan, P. Maret, and V.-H. Do. Semantic user interaction profiles for better people recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pages 434--437, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S. Wan, Y. Lan, J. Guo, C. Fan, and X. Cheng. Informational friend recommendation in social media. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 1045--1048, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. S. M. Weiss and N. Indurkhya. Lightweight collaborative filtering method for binary-encoded data. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 484--491, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S.-H. Yang, B. Long, A. Smola, N. Sadagopan, Z. Zheng, and H. Zha. Like like alike: joint friendship and interest propagation in social networks. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, pages 537--546, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIMCS'16: Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service
    August 2016
    360 pages
    ISBN:9781450348508
    DOI:10.1145/3007669

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 19 August 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    ICIMCS'16 Paper Acceptance Rate77of118submissions,65%Overall Acceptance Rate163of456submissions,36%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader