skip to main content
10.1145/3012430.3012535acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Is interpersonal participation relevant to pass?

Published:02 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The emergence of E-Learning platforms is innovating the learning process. The platforms store information about the actions of teachers and students in their databases, generating large volumes of data, which enables the measurement of learning acquisition. Nonetheless, interaction with the platform is not always a synonymous of learning. The main objective of this work is the analysis the relationship between the frequencies of interaction with the acquisition of knowledge reflected in academic performance. We analyse the interpersonal and the content's interaction of students of higher education in a blended course to classify students and to infer their performance.

References

  1. Bower, "On Emulating Classroom Discussion in a Distance Delivered OBHR Course: Creating an Online Learning Community," Academy of Management Learning and Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 22--36, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. Bento and B. y. S. C. &. Z. Brownstein, "Fostering Online Student Participation," Journal of College Teaching and Learning, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 31--37, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. McMaster, "The Praxis Equation," Isle of Man: Knowledge Based Development Corporation, pp. 95--96, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Bento, B. Brownstein, E. Kemery and S. Rawson Zacur, "A Taxonomy Of Participation In Online Courses," Journal of College Teaching & Learning, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 79--86, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Z. L. Berge, "Conceptual Frameworks in Distance Training and Education. In Deborah Schreiber and Zane L. Berge, Eds," Distance Training: How innovative organizations are using technology to maximize learning and meet business objectives, pp. 19--36, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. G. Moore, "Three Types of Interaction," The American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1--6, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. L. M. Harasim, S. R. Hiltz, L. Teles and M. Turoff, Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning On-Line, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Kemery, "Developing Online Collaboration," in Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges, Baltimore, Idea Group Publishing, 2000, pp. 227--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. González Nespereira, A. Fernández Vilas and R. P. Díaz Redondo, "Am I failing this course? Risk prediction using e-learning data," in TEEM 2015, Porto, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Caldera, M. Madriz, A. Gómez, F. Quintana, O. Marcano and D. Flores, Estudio de tiempo para mejorar el proceso productivo, Guayana: Ministerio del Poder Popular Para la Educación Universitaria, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Groover, Work Systems: The Methods, Measurement & Management of Work, Prentice Hall, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Is interpersonal participation relevant to pass?

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            TEEM '16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
            November 2016
            1165 pages
            ISBN:9781450347471
            DOI:10.1145/3012430

            Copyright © 2016 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 November 2016

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            TEEM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate167of235submissions,71%Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader