skip to main content
10.1145/3022227.3022231acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicuimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The effects of ambient scent on hedonic experience on online shopping

Published:05 January 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study examines the effects of scent on hedonic experience in online shopping and then, which investigates olfactory cues such as citrus-mint and citrus-vanilla that improve the buyer's emotional state by creating an atmospherics. We selected a citrus-based scent as an olfactory cue eliciting the feelings of pleasure and arousal. In this experiment, an olfactory cue was manipulated as an independent variable in three between-subjects designs. This research shows that the application of a citrus-mint ambient cue can help online shoppers achieve a pleasant and arousing mood and enhance online shopping experience.

References

  1. Wilkie W. L. 1994. Consumer behavior. New York: Von Hoffman Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Menon, S. and Kahn, B. 2002. Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the Internet shopping experience. Journal of retailing, 78(1), 31--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ha, H. Y. 2004. Factors influencing consumer perceptions of brand trust online. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(5), 329--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Schifferstein, H. N. and Cleiren, M. P. 2005. Capturing product experiences: a split-modality approach. Acta psychologica, 118(3), 293--318.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Morrison, M., Gan, S., Dubelaar, C. and Oppewal, H. 2011. In-store music and aroma influences on shopper behavior and satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 64, 558--564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Matsukura, H., Yoneda, T. and Ishida, H. 2012, March. Smelling screen: Technique to present a virtual odor source at an arbitrary position on a screen. In Virtual Reality Short Papers and Posters (VRW), 2012 IEEE (pp. 127--128). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yanagida, Y., Kawato, S., Noma, H., Tomono, A. and Tesutani, N. 2004, March. Projection based olfactory display with nose tracking. In Virtual Reality, 2004. Proceedings. IEEE (pp. 43--50). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chen, Y. 2006. Olfactory display: development and application in virtual reality therapy. In Artificial Reality and Telexistence-Workshops, 2006. ICAT'06. 16th International Conference on (pp. 580--584). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Wilkie, M. 1995. Scent of a Market. American Demographics, 17(8), 40--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubois, D. 2000. Categories as acts of meaning: The case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1(1), 35--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Garrett, J. J. 2006. Customer loyalty and the elements of user experience. Design management review, 17(1), 35--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Forsythe, S., Liu, C., Shannon, D. and Gardner, L. C. 2006. Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping. Journal of interactive marketing, 20(2), 55--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E. and Arnold, M. J. 2006. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 974--981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Bäckström, K. and Johansson, U. 2006. Creating and consuming experiences in retail store environments: Comparing retailer and consumer perspectives. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(6), 417--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Krishna, A. (Ed.). 2011. Sensory marketing: Research on the sensuality of products. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A. and Davis, L. M. 2003. Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses. Psychology & Marketing, 20(2), 139--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Bosmans, A. 2006. Scents and sensibility: When do (in)congruent ambient scents influence product evaluations? Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 32--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Spangenberg, E. R., Crowley, A. E. and Henderson, P. W. 1996. Improving the store environment: Do olfactory cues affect evaluations and behaviors? Journal of Marketing, 60, 67--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Spangenberg, E. R., Sprott, D. E., Grohmann, B. and Tracy, D. L. 2006. Gender-congruent ambient scent influences on approach and avoidance behaviors in a retail store. Journal of Business Research, 59(12), 1281--1287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Doucé, L. and Janssens, W. 2011. The presence of a pleasant ambient scent in a fashion store: The moderating role of shopping motivation and affect intensity. Environment and Behavior, 0013916511410421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Koo, D. M. and Ju, S. H. 2010. The interactional effects of atmospherics and perceptual curiosity on emotions and online shopping intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 377--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kim, S. and Stoel, L. 2004. Apparel retailers: website quality dimensions and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(2), 109--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Chebat, J. C. and Michon, R. 2003. Impact of ambient odors on mall shoppers' emotions, cognition, and spending: A test of competitive causal theories. Journal of Business Research, 56(7), 529--539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Milotic, D. 2003. The impact of fragrance on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3(2), 179--191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The effects of ambient scent on hedonic experience on online shopping

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IMCOM '17: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
      January 2017
      746 pages
      ISBN:9781450348881
      DOI:10.1145/3022227

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 January 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      IMCOM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate113of366submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate213of621submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader