skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025455acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

GazeEverywhere: Enabling Gaze-only User Interaction on an Unmodified Desktop PC in Everyday Scenarios

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Eye tracking is becoming more and more affordable, and thus gaze has the potential to become a viable input modality for human-computer interaction. We present the GazeEverywhere solution that can replace the mouse with gaze control by adding a transparent layer on top of the system GUI. It comprises three parts: i) the SPOCK interaction method that is based on smooth pursuit eye movements and does not suffer from the Midas touch problem; ii) an online recalibration algorithm that continuously improves gaze-tracking accuracy using the SPOCK target projections as reference points; and iii) an optional hardware setup utilizing head-up display technology to project superimposed dynamic stimuli onto the PC screen where a software modification of the system is not feasible. In validation experiments, we show that GazeEverywhere's throughput according to ISO 9241-9 was improved over dwell time based interaction methods and nearly reached trackpad level. Online recalibration reduced interaction target ('button') size by about 25%. Finally, a case study showed that users were able to browse the internet and successfully run Wikirace using gaze only, without any plug-ins or other modifications.

References

  1. 1. Hyunjin Ahn, Jaeseok Yoon, Gulji Chung, Kibum Kim, Jiyeon Ma, Hyunbin Choi, Donguk Jung, and Joongseek Lee. 2015. DOWELL: Dwell-time Based Smartphone Control Solution for People with Upper Limb Disabilities. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. Ext. Abst. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 887--892. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732862 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2. Patrick Bader, Niels Henze, Nora Broy, and Katrin Wolf. 2016. The Effect of Focus Cues on Separation of Information Layers. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 509--514. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858312 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3. Nikolaus Bee and Elisabeth André. 2008. Writing with Your Eye: A Dwell Time Free Writing System Adapted to the Nature of Human Eye Gaze. In Proc. of the 4th IEEE tutorial and research workshop on Perception and Interactive Technologies for Speech-Based Systems: Perception in Multimodal Dialogue Systems (PIT '08). Springer, 111--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4. Darrell S. Best and Andrew T. Duchowski. 2016. A rotary dial for gaze-based PIN entry. In Proc. of the 9th Biennial ACM Symp. on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA '16). ACM, 69--76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2857491.2857527 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5. Dietlind Helene Cymek, Antje Christine Venjakob, Stefan Ruff, Otto Hans-Martin Lutz, Simon Hofmann, and Matthias Roetting. 2014. Entering PIN codes by smooth pursuit eye movements. Journal of Eye Movement Research 7, 4 (2014), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6. Michael Dorr, Martin Böhme, Thomas Martinetz, and Erhardt Barth. 2007. Gaze beats mouse: A case study. In Proc. of the 3rd Conf. on Communication by Gaze Interaction (COGAIN '07). 16--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7. Sarah A. Douglas, Arthur E. Kirkpatrick, and I. Scott MacKenzie. 1999. Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 215--222. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/302979.303042 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8. Heiko Drewes and Albrecht Schmidt. 2007. Interacting with the Computer Using Gaze Gestures. In Proc. of the 11th IFIP Int. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction. INTERACT '07, Vol. 4663. Springer, Berlin, 475--488. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--74800--7{_}43Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. 9. Augusto Esteves, Eduardo Velloso, Andreas Bulling, and Hans Gellersen. 2015. Orbits: Gaze Interaction for Smart Watches using Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements. In Proc. of the 28th Annual ACM Symp. on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 457--466. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807499 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10. Jens R. Helmert, Sebastian Pannasch, and Boris M. Velichkovsky. 2008. Influences of dwell time and cursor control on the performance in gaze driven typing. Journal of Eye Movement Research 2, 4 (2008), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11. Anke Huckauf and Mario H. Urbina. 2011. Object Selection in Gaze Controlled Systems: What You Don't Look at is What You Get. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 8, 2 (2011), 13:1--13:14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1870076.1870081 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12. Robert J. K. Jacob. 1990. What you look at is what you get: eye movement-based interaction techniques. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '90). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--18. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/97243.97246 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13. Chris Lankford. 2000. Effective Eye-gaze Input into Windows. In Proc. of the 1st Biennial Symp. on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 23--27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/355017.355021 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14. Christof Lutteroth, Moiz Penkar, and Gerald Weber. 2015. Gaze vs. Mouse: A Fast and Accurate Gaze-Only Click Alternative. In Proc. of the 28th Annual ACM Symp. on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 385--394. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807461 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15. I. Scott MacKenzie. 2010. An eye on input. In Proc. of the 6th Biennial ACM Symp. on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA '10). ACM, 11--12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1743666.1743668 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16. John Magee, Torsten Felzer, and I. Scott MacKenzie. 2015. Camera Mouse + ClickerAID: Dwell vs. Single-Muscle Click Actuation in Mouse-Replacement Interfaces. In Proc. of the 16th Int. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction (LNCS), Vol. 9170. 74--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. 17. Päivi Majaranta, Ulla-Kaija Ahola, and Oleg Špakov. 2009. Fast Gaze Typing with an Adjustable Dwell Time. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 357--360. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518758 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18. Päivi Majaranta, Anne Aula, and Kari-Jouko Räihä. 2004. Effects of Feedback on Eye Typing with a Short Dwell Time. In Proc. of the 3rd Biennial ACM Symp. on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA '04). ACM, 139--146. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/968363.968390 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19. Emilie Møllenbach, John Paulin Hansen, and Martin Lillholm. 2013. Eye Movements in Gaze Interaction. Journal of Eye Movement Research 6, 1 (2013), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20. Emilie Møllenbach, John Paulin Hansen, Martin Lillholm, and Alastair G. Gale. 2009. Single Stroke Gaze Gestures. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4555--4560. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520699 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21. Diogo Pedrosa, Maria da Graça Pimentel, and Khai N. Truong. 2015. Filteryedping: A Dwell-Free Eye Typing Technique. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. Ext. Abst. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 303--306. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2725458 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22. Abdul Moiz Penkar, Christof Lutteroth, and Gerald Weber. 2012. Designing for the Eye: Design Parameters for Dwell in Gaze Interaction. In Proc. of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conf. (OzCHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 479--488. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2414536.2414609 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23. D. A. Ray. 1969. Head-Up Display. The Aeronautical Journal 73, 703 (1969), 622--624. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000052295Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. 24. Dario D. Salvucci and John R. Anderson. 2000. Intelligent Gaze-added Interfaces. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 273--280. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/332040.332444 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25. Simon Schenk, Philipp Tiefenbacher, Gerhard Rigoll, and Michael Dorr. 2016. SPOCK: A Smooth Pursuit Oculomotor Control Kit. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. Ext. Abst. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2681--2687. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892291 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26. Donald Shepard. 1968. A Two-dimensional Interpolation Function for Irregularly-spaced Data. In Proc. of the 1968 23rd ACM Nat. Conf. (ACM '68). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 517--524. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/800186.810616 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27. Henrik Skovsgaard, Julio C. Mateo, John M. Flach, and John Paulin Hansen. 2010. Small-target Selection with Gaze Alone. In Proc. of the 6th Biennial ACM Symp. on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA '10). ACM, 145--148. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1743666.1743702 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28. Mélodie Vidal, Andreas Bulling, and Hans Gellersen. 2013. Pursuits: spontaneous interaction with displays based on smooth pursuit eye movement and moving targets. In Proc. of the 2013 ACM Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 439--448. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2493432.2493477 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29. David J. Ward and David J. C. MacKay. 2002. Fast Hands-free Writing by Gaze Direction. Nature 418 (2002), 838. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/418838a Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. 30. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Kristen Shinohara, and Alex Jansen. 2011. The effects of task dimensionality, endpoint deviation, throughput calculation, and experiment design on pointing measures and models. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1639--1648. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979181 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 31. Xuan Zhang and I. Scott MacKenzie. 2007. Evaluating eye tracking with ISO 9241-part 9. In Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. of HCI Intelligent Multimodal Interaction Environments, Part III (HCII '07). 779--788.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. GazeEverywhere: Enabling Gaze-only User Interaction on an Unmodified Desktop PC in Everyday Scenarios

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader