skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025552acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding and Detecting Divided Attention in Mobile MOOC Learning

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The emergence of mobile apps for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) allows learners to access quality learning materials at low cost and "to control where, what, how and with whom they learn". Unfortunately, when compared with traditional classroom education, learners face more distractions and are more likely to multitask when they study alone in an informal learning environment. In this paper, we investigate the impact of divided attention (DA) on both the learning process and learning outcomes in the context of mobile MOOC learning. We propose OneMind, a system and algorithm for detecting divided attention on unmodified mobile phones via implicit, camera-based heart rate tracking. In an 18-participant study, we found that internal divided attention has a significant negative impact on learning outcomes; and that the photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms implicitly captured by OneMind can be used to detect the presence, type, and intensity of divided attention in mobile MOOC learning.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1488p.mp4

mp4

3.2 MB

References

  1. Robert Bixler and Sidney D'Mello. 2014. Toward Fully Automated Person-Independent Detection of Mind Wandering. In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2014), 37--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Nathaniel Blanchard, Robert Bixler, Tera Joyce, and Sidney D'Mello. 2014. Automated Physiological-Based Detection of Mind Wandering during Learning. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2014), 55--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Phillip Compeau and Pavel A. Pevzner. 2015. Life After MOOCs. Communications of the ACM 58.10 (2015): 41--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Craik Fergus IM, Richard Govoni, Moshe NavehBenjamin, and Nicole D. Anderson. 1996. The Effects of Divided Attention on Encoding and Retrieval Processes in Human Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125.2 (1996): 159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Phillip J. Guo, Juho Kim, and Rob Rubin. 2014. How Video Production Affects Student Engagement: An Empirical Study of MOOC Videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference, 41--50Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Teng Han, Xiang Xiao, Lanfei Shi, John Canny, and Jingtao Wang. 2015. Balancing Accuracy and Fun: Designing Engaging Camera Based Mobile Games for Implicit Heart Rate Monitoring, In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2015), 847--856. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Larry L. Jacoby. 1991. A Process Dissociation Framework: Separating Automatic from Intentional Uses of Memory. Journal of memory and language 30.5 (1991): 513--541. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Daniel Kahneman. 1973. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Thierry Karsenti. 2013. What the Research Says. International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education 10.2 (2013): 23--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Matthew A. Killingsworth and Daniel T. Gilbert. 2010. A Wandering Mind is an Unhappy Mind. Science 330.6006 (2010): 932--932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Malia F. Mason, Michael I. Norton, John D. Van Horn, Daniel M. Wegner, Scott T. Grafton, and C. Neil Macrae. 2007. Wandering Minds: the Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought. Science 315.5810 (2007): 393--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Phuong Pham and Jingtao Wang. 2015. AttentiveLearner: Improving Mobile MOOC Learning via Implicit Heart Rate Tracking. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2015), 367--376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Mathieu Rodrigue, Jungah Son, Barry Giesbrecht, Matthew Turk, and Tobias Höllerer. 2015. SpatioTemporal Detection of Divided Attention in Reading Applications Using EEG and Eye Tracking. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2015), 121--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kristina Schaaff and Marc TP Adam. 2013. Measuring Emotional Arousal for Online Applications: Evaluation of Ultra-Short Term Heart Rate Variability Measures. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII 2013), 362--368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Edward E. Smith and Stephen M. Kosslyn. 2013. Cognitive Psychology: Pearson New International Edition: Mind and Brain. Pearson Higher Ed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Daniel Szafir and Bilge Mutlu. 2013. ARTFul: Adaptive Review Technology for Flipped Learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013), 1001--1010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Xiang Xiao and Jingtao Wang. 2015. Towards Attentive, Bi-directional MOOC Learning on Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI 2015), 163--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Xiang Xiao and Jingtao Wang. 2013. LensGesture: Augmenting Mobile Interactions with Back-of-Device Finger Gestures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI 2013), 287--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding and Detecting Divided Attention in Mobile MOOC Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader