skip to main content
10.1145/3027063.3053117acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract
Public Access

The Use of Smart Glasses for Lecture Comprehension by Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students

Published:06 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Deaf and hard of hearing students must constantly switch between several visual sources to gather all necessary information during a classroom lecture (e.g., instructor, slides, sign language interpreter or captioning). Using smart glasses, this research tested a potential means to reduce the effects of visual field switches, proposing that consolidating sources into a single display may improve lecture comprehension. Results showed no statistically significant comprehension improvements with the glasses, but interviews indicated that participants found it easier to follow the lecture with glasses and saw the potential for them in the classroom. Future work highlights priorities for smart glasses consideration and new research directions.

References

  1. Alessandra Brandão, Hugo Nicolau, Shreya Tadas, and Vicki L. Hanson. 2016. SlidePacer: A presentation delivery tool for instructors of deaf and hard of hearing students. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference (ASSETS'16). New York, NY, USA, 25--32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982177Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Anna C. Cavender, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Richard E. Ladner. 2009. ClassInFocus: Enabling improved visual attention strategies for deaf and hard of hearing students. In Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 67--74. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1639642.163965Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Center for Accessibility and Inclusion Research (CAIR). 2017. http://cair.rit.edu/ Retrieved 16 Feb, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Matjaz Debevec, Danijela Milosevic, and Inex Kozuh. 2015. A comparison of comprehension processes in sign language interpreter videos with or without captions. PLOS ONE 10(5): e0127577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127577 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Michael Jones, M. Jeannette Lawler, Eric Hintz, Nathan Bench, Fred Mangrubang, and Mallory Trullender. 2014. Head mounted displays and deaf children: Facilitating sign language in challenging learning environments. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children (IDC '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 317--320. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610481 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Moverio, BT-200 Smart Glasses (Developer Version Only). https://epson.com/ForWork/Wearables/Smart-Glasses/Moverio-BT-200Smart-Glasses-%28Developer-VersionOnly%29/p/V11H560020. Retrieved 16 Feb, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Olive Devices n.d. http://www.olivedevices.com/ Retrieved 12 Feb, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Raja Kushalnagar and Poorna Kushalnagar. 2014. Collaborative gaze cues and replay for deaf and hard of hearing students. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 8548, 415--422. DOI= 10.1007/978--3--319-08599--9_63Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Walter S. Lasecki, Raja Kushalnagar, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2014. Helping students keep up with realtime captions by pausing and highlighting. In Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference (W4A '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 39, 8 pages. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2596695.2596701 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Halley Profita, Reem Albaghli, Leah Findlater, Paul Jaeger, and Shaun K. Kane. 2016. The AT affect: How disability affects the perceived social acceptability of head-mounted display use. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4884--4895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858130Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Use of Smart Glasses for Lecture Comprehension by Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2017
        3954 pages
        ISBN:9781450346566
        DOI:10.1145/3027063

        Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 May 2017

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI EA '17 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader