Jialun "Aaron" Jiang
Jed R. Brubaker
Casey Fiesler
ABSTRACT
Animated GIFs are increasingly popular in text-based communication. Like other forms of nonverbal communication, animated GIFs are susceptible to open interpretation. We explore whether people have different interpretations of animated GIFs, how those interpretations differ, and what factors impact the degree of difference. Through an online survey, we solicited people's interpretations of a sample of GIFs, and analyzed the variance in sentiment based on the emotions participants used to describe GIFs. We find diverse interpretations of GIFs, and that duration of GIFs has a significant impact on interpretation. Positive GIFs also have more variance in interpretation than negative GIFs. Overall, we show that there is potential for miscommunication in animated GIFs, and animated GIFs may be a more nuanced form of nonverbal communication than emoticons and emoji.
- Saeideh Bakhshi, David A. Shamma, Lyndon Kennedy, Yale Song, Paloma de Juan, and Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2016. Fast, Cheap, and Good: Why Animated GIFs Engage Us. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 575--586. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858532Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Elli Bourlai and Susan C. Herring. 2014. Multimodal Communication on Tumblr: "I Have So Many Feels!" In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science (WebSci '14), 171--175. https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615697Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. J. Hutto and Eric Gilbert. 2014. VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved December 12, 2016 from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM1 4/paper/view/8109Google Scholar
- Mike Isaac. 2015. For Mobile Messaging, GIFs Prove to Be Worth at Least a Thousand Words. The New York Times. Retrieved January 9, 2017 from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/04/technology/gif s-go-beyond-emoji-to-express-thoughts-withoutwords.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Sara Kiesler, Jane Siegel, and Timothy W. McGuire. 1984. Social psychological aspects of computermediated communication. American Psychologist 39, 10: 1123--1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003066X.39.10.1123 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin Lea and Russell Spears. 1992. Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing 2, 3--4: 321--341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919399209540190Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hannah Jean Miller, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Shuo Chang, Isaac Johnson, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2016. "Blissfully Happy" or "Ready toFight": Varying Interpretations of Emoji. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Retrieved September 16, 2016 from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM1 6/paper/view/13167Google Scholar
- Jaram Park, Vladimir Barash, Clay Fink, and Meeyoung Cha. 2013. Emoticon Style: Interpreting Differences in Emoticons Across Cultures. In Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved October 21, 2016 from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM1 3/paper/view/6132Google Scholar
- Lee Sproull and Sara Kiesler. 1986. Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication. Management Science 32, 11: 1492--1512. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Garreth W. Tigwell and David R. Flatla. 2016. Oh That's What You Meant!: Reducing Emoji Misunderstanding. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI '16), 859--866. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2961844Google ScholarDigital Library
- JOSEPH B. WALTHER. 1992. Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective. Communication Research 19, 1: 52--90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph B. Walther. 1996. Computer-Mediated Communication Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research 23, 1: 3--43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph B. Walther and Kyle P. D'Addario. 2001. The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review 19, 3: 324--347. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900307 Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Understanding Diverse Interpretations of Animated GIFs
Recommendations
Predicting Viewer Perceived Emotions in Animated GIFs
MM '14: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on MultimediaAnimated GIFs are everywhere on the Web. Our work focuses on the computational prediction of emotions perceived by viewers after they are shown animated GIF images. We evaluate our results on a dataset of over 3,800 animated GIFs gathered from MIT's ...
'The Perfect One': Understanding Communication Practices and Challenges with Animated GIFs
Animated GIFs are increasingly popular in text-based communication. Finding the perfect GIF can make conversations funny, interesting, and engaging, but GIFs also introduce potentials for miscommunication. Through 24 in-depth qualitative interviews, this ...
Understanding the Relationship Between Social Identity and Self-Expression Through Animated Gifs on Social Media
CSCWGIFs afford a high degree of personalization, as they are often created from popular movie and video clips with diverse and realistic characters, each expressing a nuanced emotional state through a combination of characters' own unique bodily gestures ...
Comments