skip to main content
10.1145/3041021.3055131acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Warm Welcome Matters!: The Link Between Social Feedback and Weight Loss in /r/loseit

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social feedback has long been recognized as an important element of successful health-related behavior change. How- ever, most of the existing studies look at the effect that offline social feedback has. This paper fills gaps in the literature by proposing a framework to study the causal effect that receiving social support in the form of comments in an online weight loss community has on (i) the probability of the user to return to the forum, and, more importantly, on (ii) the weight loss reported by the user. Using a matching approach for causal inference we observe a difference of 9 lbs lost between users who do or do not receive comments. Surprisingly, this effect is mediated by neither an increase in lifetime in the community nor by an increased activity level of the user. Our results show the importance that a "warm welcome" has when using online support forums to achieve health outcomes.

References

  1. P. C. Austin. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate behavioral research, 46(3):399--424, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. Ballantine and R. Stephenson. Help me, I'm fat! Social support in online weight loss networks. J. of Consumer Behaviour, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. L. Black, J. Bute, and L. Russell. Cases on Online Discussion and Interaction: Experiences and Outcomes, chapter "The Secret Is Out!": Supporting Weight Loss through Online Interaction. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Boone. Mediation analysis: Expanding from one mediator to multiple mediators. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Burke, C. Marlow, and T. Lento. Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In CHI, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. D. Choudhury and S. De. Mental health discourse on reddit: Self-disclosure, social support, and anonymity. In ICWSM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Cunha, I. Weber, and et al. The effect of social feedback in a reddit weight loss community. In DigitalHealth, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. De Choudhury, E. Kiciman, and et al. Discovering shifts to suicidal ideation from mental health content in social media. In CHI, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. denovosibi. {results} winter/spring 2016 user survey, 2016. https://www.reddit.com/r/loseit/comments/4acxxn/results_winterspring_2016_user_survey/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Eschler, Z. Dehlawi, and W. Pratt. Self-characterized illness phase and information needs of participants in an online cancer forum. In ICWSM, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. F. Fontana, R. D. Kerns, and et al. Support, stress, and recovery from coronary heart disease: a longitudinal causal model. Health Psychol, 8(2):175--193, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. Grav, O. Hellzèn, and et al. Association between social support and depression in the general population: the hunt study, a cross-sectional survey. J. of clinical nursing, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. Hesterberg, D. S. Moore, S. Monaghan, A. Clipson, and R. Epstein. Bootstrap methods and permutation tests. Introduction to the Practice of Statistics, 5:1--70, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. M. Hutchesson, Y. C. Tan, and et al. Enhancement of self-monitoring in a web-based weight loss program by extra individualized feedback and reminders: Randomized trial. J Med Internet Res, 18(4):e82, Apr 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. C. J. Hutto and E. Gilbert. VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In ICWSM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. K. O. Hwang, A. J. Ottenbacher, and et al. Social support in an internet weight loss community. International journal of medical informatics, 79(1):5--13, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. K. Imai, G. King, and E. A. Stuart. Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference. Journal of the royal statistical society, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. G. J. Johnson and P. J. Ambrose. Neo-tribes: The power and potential of online communities in health care. Communications of the ACM, 49(1):107--113, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. G. King, C. Lucas, and R. Nielsen. The balance-sample size frontier in matching methods for causal inference. PS: Political Science and Politics, 42:S11--S22, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. G. King and R. Nielsen. Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. http://j.mp/1sexgVw, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. H. Lett, J. Blumenthal, and et al. Social support and coronary heart disease: epidemiologic evidence and implications for treatment. Psychosomatic medicine, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. R. Mermelstein, S. Cohen, and et al. Social support and smoking cessation and maintenance. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 54(4):447, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. D. Mimno, H. M. Wallach, E. Talley, M. Leenders, and A. McCallum. Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Olteanu, O. Varol, and E. Kıcıman. Towards an open-domain framework for distilling the outcomes of personal experiences from social media timelines. In ICWSM, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. K. Park, I. Weber, and et al. Persistent sharing of fitness app status on twitter. In CSCW, pages 184--194, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. K. Patrick, K. Calfas, and et al. Outcomes of a 12-month web-based intervention for overweight and obese men. Ann Behav Med, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. D. Rubin and E. Stuart. Affinely invariant matching methods with discriminant mixtures of proportional ellipsoidally symmetric distributions. Statistics, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. D. B. Rubin. Multivariate matching methods that are equal percent bias reducing, i: Some examples. Biometrics, 1976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. M. E. Sobel. Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. Sociological methodology, 16:159--186, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. J. Song and K. Chung. Observational studies: cohort and case-control studies. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. E. A. Stuart. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical science: a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. C. F. Sullivan. Gendered cybersupport: A thematic analysis of two online cancer support groups. Journal of health psychology, 8(1):83--104, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. A. Tamersoy, M. De Choudhury, and D. H. Chau. Characterizing smoking and drinking abstinence from social media. In Hypertext, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. P. J. Teixeira, E. V. Carraça, and et al. Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators. BMC medicine, 13(1):1, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. M. Thiese, G. Moffitt, R. Hanowski, and et al. Commercial Driver Medical Examinations: Prevalence of Obesity, Comorbidities, and Certification Outcomes. J. Occup. Environ. Med., 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. F. Tsapeli and M. Musolesi. Investigating causality in human behavior from smartphone sensor data: a quasi-experimental approach. EPJ Data Science, 4(1):1--15, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. G. M. Turner-McGrievy and D. F. Tate. Weight loss social support in 140 characters or less: use of an online social network in a remotely delivered weight loss intervention. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 3(3):287--294, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. J. van der Zwaan, V. Dignum, and et al. A conversation model enabling intelligent agents to give emotional support. In Modern Advances in Intelligent Systems and Tools. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. M. Wang, L. Pbert, and S. Lemon. Influence of family, friend and coworker social support and social undermining on weight gain prevention among adults. Obesity, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Y. Wang, I. Weber, and P. Mitra. Quantified self meets social media: Sharing of weight updates on twitter. In DH, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Warm Welcome Matters!: The Link Between Social Feedback and Weight Loss in /r/loseit

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            WWW '17 Companion: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion
            April 2017
            1738 pages
            ISBN:9781450349147

            Publisher

            International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

            Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 April 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            WWW '17 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate164of966submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader