Sagar K. Wadkar
Khajan Singh
ABSTRACT
Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are continuously emerging as key tools to support development activities undertaken by Governments, civil society and private enterprises. It has been showing significant result in addressing information asymmetry gap in many sectors and localities, especially in agriculture & allied sector. The rural people, specifically farming communities have been getting timely & relevant information, services & support, and farming inputs. However, the sustainability of these ICT based efforts in improving well-being of farming communities is key to the effectiveness of a rural ICT projects in India. The present paper aimed to determine the sustainability of the aAQUA (Almost All Questions Answered) e-Agriservice in Maharashtra state, western parts of India covering the four districts of the state. The study used the ex-post facto (cause to effect) research design in a quasi-intervention setting. The list of registered users was obtained from the service provider (presently Agrocom Software Technologies Pvt. Ltd.) and total of 120 users were selected randomly from four districts (30 users from each district). The sustainable-Agriservice Index (SeAGRSI) was computed based on the five dimensions viz. technological, economic, social, institutional, and political by using Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA), Mixed Method Approach and Normalized Rank Order Method (NROM). The study revealed that the SeAGRSI for the social indicators was the highest among other dimensions of the sustainability (SeAGRSI = 0.77) followed by the technologically (0.73), economic (0.71) political (0.62) and institutional (0.58) sustainable. It was also found that the mean SeAGRSI was 0.70 as reported by one third (32.50%) of the users, which means 70 per cent the aAQUA e-Agriservice was technologically, socially, economically, institutionally and politically sustainable.
- Adrianto, L., Matsuda, Y., and Sakuma, Y. 2005. Assessing local sustainability of fisheries system: A multi-criteria participatory approach with the case of Yoron Isaland, Kagoshima prefecture, Japan. Marine policy, 29 (1): 9--23.Google Scholar
- Annamalai, K. and Rao, S. 2003. What works: ITC's e-Choupal and profitable rural transformation: Web-based information and procurement tools for Indian farmers. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
- Ashraf, M. M., Hanisch, J., and Swatman, P. 2007. ICT intervention towards development. 3rd Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), Bangladesh. Developing Countries: Theory and Practice, City University of Hong Kong Press, pp: 83--100.Google Scholar
- Best, M. and Kumar, R. 2008. Sustainability failures of rural telecentres: Challenges from the Sustainable Access in Rural India (SARI) project. Information Technologies and International Development, 4 (4): 31--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buré, C. 2007. Grounding gender evaluation methodology for telecentres: The experiences of Ecuador and the Phillipines. Ottawa: Telecentre.Org, International Development Research Centre (IDRC).Google Scholar
- Dalenius, T. and Hodges, J. L. 1959. Minimum variance stratification. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54: 88--101.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dash, R., Chattopadhyay, P., and Pahuja, N. 2007. Environmental sustainability index for Indian states. Centre for Development Finance Institute for Financial Management and Research, Chennai.Google Scholar
- Dossani, R., Misra, D. C., and Jhaveri, R. 2005. Enabling ICT for rural India. Project Report, Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University and National Informatics Centre, Government of India.Google Scholar
- Draca, M., Sadun, R., and Reenen, J. V. 2006. Productivity and ICT: A review of the evidence, Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) discussion paper No. 749, London school of economics and political science, London.Google Scholar
- Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychological methods. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd. Noida, UP.Google Scholar
- Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success and local improvisations. The Info. Society, 18(2): 101--112.Google Scholar
- Heeks, R. (2010). Do information and communication technologies contribute to development? J. of Internat. Development, 22: 625--640.Google ScholarCross Ref
- IFAD Strategic Framework (2007). Enabling the rural poor to overcome poverty. EB 2006/89/R.2/Rev.1. 89th Session, Rome.Google Scholar
- Kerlinger, F. N. (1983). Foundation of behavioural research. S. S. Chabra Publishers, Delhi, India. pp: 151--153.Google Scholar
- Kretschmer, T. (2012) Information and communication technologies and productivity growth: A survey of the literature", OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 195, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Kuriyan, R., Ray, I. and Toyama, K. (2008). Information and communication technologies for development: The bottom of the pyramid model in practice. The Information Society, 24(2): 93--104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lio, M. and Liu, M. (2006) ICT and agricultural productivity: evidence from cross-country data, Agricultural Economics, 34: 221--228.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mbarika, V. W. A., Okoli, C., Byrd, T. A. and Datta, P. (2005). The neglected continent of IS research: A research agenda for Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of the AIS, 6(5): 130--170.Google Scholar
- McNamara, K. S. (2003). Information and communication technologies, poverty and development: Learning from Experience. A Background Paper for the InfoDev Annual Symposium, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Mendoza, G. A. and Prabhu, R. 2003. Qualitative Multi-criteria Approaches to Assessing Indicators of Sustainable Forest Resources Management. Forest Ecol. Manag. 174: 329--343.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meso, P., Datta, P. and Mbarika, V. (2006). Moderating information and communication technologies influences on socioeconomic development with good governance: A study of the developing countries. J. of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(2): 186--197. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Musa, P.F. (2006). Making a case for modifying the technology acceptance model to account for limited accessibility in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 12(3), 213--224.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pade-Khene, C., Mallinson, B. and Sewry, D. (2011). Sustainable rural ICT project management practice for developing countries: Investigating the DWESA and RUMEP projects. Information Technology for Development, 17(3): 187--212. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Parkins, J. R., Richard, C. S. and Varghese, J. 2001. Moving towards local-level indicators of sustainability of forest-based communities: a mixed-method approach. Social Indicators Research, pp. 43--72.Google Scholar
- Promila (1994). Gender analysis in dairy and crop production in Kangra district, Himachal Pradesh. Ph.D. Thesis, NDRI, Karnal, Haryana.Google Scholar
- Raju, K. A. (2004). A case for harnessing information technology for rural development. The Internat. Information & Library Review, 36:233--240.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ramamritham, K., Bahuman, C. and Bahuman, A. (2011) aAQUA: ICT-enabled Knowledge Services to Farmers in India. M. Hazelman and S. Attaluri's edited book on 'Success Stories on ICT/ICM in AR4D in Asia and the Pacific Region', FAO.Google Scholar
- Rao, N. H. (2006). A framework for implementing information and communication technologies in agricultural development in India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74: 491--518.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rao, S. S. (2008). Social development in Indian rural communities: Adoption of telecentres. International J. of Information Management, 28: 474--482. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sah, A. K. (1996). A descriptive study of existing dairy farming practices and constraints in adoption of improved dairy practices among dairy farmers in Banka district, Bihar. M.Sc. Thesis, NDRI, Karnal, Haryana.Google Scholar
- Singh, Nirvikar (2007) ICT and rural development in India, UCSC working paper.Google Scholar
- Tacchi, J., Slater, D., & Lewis, P. 2003. Evaluating community based media initiatives: An ethnographic action research approach. Paper presented at the meeting of the Information Technology for Development Conference, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Unwin, T. 2009. ICT4D: Information and Communication Technology for Development, Cambridge university press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Upton, D. M. and Fuller, V. A. (2004). The ITC e-Choupal initiative (Case No. 9-604- 016). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
- Wadkar, S. K., Singh, K., Kadian, K. S., Malhotra, R. and Garde, Y. A. (2015) Comparative study on effectiveness of the aAQUA e-Agriservice among dairy farmers of Maharashtra, Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 68(4): 408--411.Google Scholar
- World Commission on Environment and Development 1987. Our common future, Oxford university press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Recommendations
An exploration of the categories associated with ICT project sustainability in rural areas of developing countries: a case study of the Dwesa project
SAICSIT '06: Proceedings of the 2006 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countriesInformation Communication Technologies (ICTs) play a significant role in enhancing rural development in developing countries. However, rural ICT projects are confronted with challenges that result in projects that are not sustainable, or fail altogether. ...
An assessment of ICT challenges in rural areas: ICT experts vs rural users views: a case of the Siyakhula Living Lab
SAICSIT '13: Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists ConferenceResearch shows that Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) can make a significant contribution to economic growth and social development of communities. However, in rural areas there are challenges that appear to slow down the progress and ...
Application of ICT to improve rural livelihood in Vietnam
In recent years, information and communication technologies ICT impacted greatly socioeconomic development in developing countries. Encouraged by the development of rural IT network projects in countries like India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Philippines,...
Comments