skip to main content
10.1145/3077136.3080752acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A Cross-Platform Collection for Contextual Suggestion

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Suggesting personalized venues helps users to find interesting places on location-based social networks (LBSNs). Although there are many LBSNs online, none of them is known to have thorough information about all venues. The Contextual Suggestion track at TREC aimed at providing a collection consisting of places as well as user context to enable researchers to examine and compare different approaches, under the same evaluation setting. However, the officially released collection of the track did not meet many participants' needs related to venue content, online reviews, and user context. That is why almost all successful systems chose to crawl information from different LBSNs. For example, one of the best proposed systems in the TREC 2016 Contextual Suggestion track crawled data from multiple LBSNs and enriched it with venue-context appropriateness ratings, collected using a crowdsourcing platform. Such collection enabled the system to better predict a venue's appropriateness to a given user's context. In this paper, we release both collections that were used by the system above. We believe that these datasets give other researchers the opportunity to compare their approaches with the top systems in the track. Also, it provides the opportunity to explore different methods to predicting contextually appropriate venues.

References

  1. Mohammad Aliannejadi and Fabio Crestani 2017. Venue Appropriateness Prediction for Personalized Context-Aware Venue Suggestion SIGIR 2017. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mohammad Aliannejadi, Ida Mele, and Fabio Crestani. 2016. User Model Enrichment for Venue Recommendation. In AIRS 2016. Springer, 212--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Li Chen, Guanliang Chen, and Feng Wang 2015. Recommender systems based on user reviews: the state of the art. UMUAI, Vol. 25, 2 (2015), 99--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Romain Deveaud, M-Dyaa Albakour, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis 2015. Experiments with a Venue-Centric Model for Personalised and Time-Aware Venue Suggestion CIKM 2015. ACM, 53--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Seyyed Hadi Hashemi, Charles L. A. Clarke, Jaap Kamps, Julia Kiseleva, and Ellen M. Voorhees. 2016. Overview of the TREC 2016 Contextual Suggestion Track TREC 2016. NIST.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Peilin Yang, Hongning Wang, Hui Fang, and Deng Cai. 2015. Opinions matter: a general approach to user profile modeling for contextual suggestion. Information Retrieval Journal Vol. 18, 6 (2015), 586--610. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Cross-Platform Collection for Contextual Suggestion

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '17: Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
        August 2017
        1476 pages
        ISBN:9781450350228
        DOI:10.1145/3077136

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 August 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '17 Paper Acceptance Rate78of362submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader