skip to main content
10.1145/3079628.3079696acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Improving Cold Start Recommendation by Mapping Feature-Based Preferences to Item Comparisons

Published:09 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many Recommender Systems (RSs) rely on user preference data in the form of ratings or likes for items. Previous research has shown that item comparisons can also be effectively used to model user preferences and build RS. However, users often express their preferences by referring to specific features of the items. For instance, a user may like Italian movies more than Indian ones or like action-thriller movies. In this paper, we map such preferences over features to comparisons between items. For instance, when a user's favorite feature is `action', we then assume that `action' movies are preferred to some of the movies that are not `action'. In this work we effectively incorporate these feature based comparisons in a RS and show that such preferences can be effectively combined along with other item comparisons. Moreover, we also study the usefulness of the available features.

References

  1. H. Blanco and F. Ricci. Inferring user utility for query revision recommendation. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 245--252. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Blédaité and F. Ricci. Pairwise preferences elicitation and exploitation for conversational collaborative filtering. In Proc. Hypertext & Social Media '15, pages 231--236, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Braunhofer and F. Ricci. Contextual information elicitation in travel recommender systems. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016, pages 579--592. Springer, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. I. Fernández-Tobías, M. Braunhofer, M. Elahi, F. Ricci, and I. Cantador. Alleviating the new user problem in collaborative filtering by exploiting personality information. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 26(2--3):221--255, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Z. Gantner, L. Drumond, C. Freudenthaler, S. Rendle, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Learning attribute-to-feature mappings for cold-start recommendations. In Data Mining (ICDM), 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on, pages 176--185. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Kalloori, F. Ricci, and M. Tkalcic. Pairwise preferences based matrix factorization and nearest neighbor recommendation techniques. In Proc. RecSys 2016, pages 143--146. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Y. Koren and R. Bell. Advances in collaborative filtering. In Recommender systems handbook, pages 77--118. Springer, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. L. Lerche and D. Jannach. Using graded implicit feedback for bayesian personalized ranking. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems, pages 353--356. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Nasery, M. Braunhofer, and F. Ricci. Recommendations with optimal combination of feature-based and item-based preferences. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization, pages 269--273. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Nasery, M. Elahi, and P. Cremonesi. Polimovie: a feature-based dataset for recommender systems. In ACM RecSys 2015 CrowdRec Workshop, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. X. Ning and G. Karypis. Sparse linear methods with side information for top-n recommendations. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 155--162. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Rendle and C. Freudenthaler. Improving pairwise learning for item recommendation from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 273--282. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Bpr: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, pages 452--461. AUAI Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. Ricci, L. Rokach, and B. Shapira. Recommender systems: Introduction and challenges. In Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. N. Rubens, M. Elahi, M. Sugiyama, and D. Kaplan. Active learning in recommender systems. In Recommender systems handbook, pages 809--846. Springer, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. T. L. Saaty. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1):83--98, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Scholz. From consumer preferences towards buying decisions-conjoint analysis as preference measuring method in product recommender systems. BLED 2008 Proceedings, page 28, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. N. Tintarev and J. Masthoff. Effective explanations of recommendations: user-centered design. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 153--156. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UMAP '17: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
    July 2017
    420 pages
    ISBN:9781450346351
    DOI:10.1145/3079628
    • General Chairs:
    • Maria Bielikova,
    • Eelco Herder,
    • Program Chairs:
    • Federica Cena,
    • Michel Desmarais

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 July 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    UMAP '17 Paper Acceptance Rate29of80submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate162of633submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader