skip to main content
10.1145/3080556.3080559acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslimitsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Limits of the Smart Sustainable City

Published:22 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The ongoing and escalating urbanisation has resulted in a situation where a majority of people worldwide live in cities. Cities stand for a substantial part of the world GDP and are often lifted as possible drivers of sustainable development. However, the city has limitations and vulnerabilities. Cities depend on resources flowing into the city and increasing populations strain their land use. Climate change threatens cities with sea-level rise, heat waves and extreme weather events. Transforming cities into Smart Sustainable Cities by incorporation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) is becoming a recurring proposed solution to these limitations and challenges. The two main areas where ICT are envisioned to function for this are i) as part of the city's infrastructure for monitoring, efficiency and automatization of processes, and ii) as an enabler for sharing of both information and goods among citizens, expectedly leading to more sustainable urban lifestyles. However, there are several limits to the realisation of the Smart Sustainable City. Manufacturing, implementation and maintenance of its digital infrastructure hold environmental risks and require human and natural resources. Furthermore, there are issues of increased vulnerability of the city due to increased complexity. Already now, the (global) flows that the city depends upon to thrive, are to a large and increasing extent possible due to - and dependent on - ICTs working without disturbances. Considering the fragility of these systems, both physical and virtual, is the Smart Sustainable City a desirable or even feasible path?

We suggest that while ICT may be useful for making cities more sustainable, we need to be heedful so as not to make the city even more vulnerable in the process. We suggest that we should make sure that the ICT systems simply assist the cities, while maintaining analogue backup in case the ICT shuts down; that we should build more resilient ICT systems with higher backward compatibility; and that we should acknowledge increasing complexity as a problem and strive to counteract it.

References

  1. Maarten K Van Aalst. 2006. The impacts of climate change on the risk of natural disasters. Disasters 30, 1: 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Sam Allwinkle and Peter Cruickshank. 2011. Creating Smart-er Cities: An Overview. Journal of Urban Technology 18, 2: 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Franco Archibugi. 2008. Planning Theory: From the Political Debate to the Methodological Reconstruction. Springer-Verlag, Milano.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Frans Berkhout and Julia Hertin. 2004. De-materialising and re-materialising: digital technologies and the environment. Futures 36, 8: 903--920.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Gilles Billen, Josette Garnier, and Sabine Barles. 2012. History of the urban environmental imprint: introduction to a multidisciplinary approach to the long-term relationships between Western cities and their hinterland. Regional Environmental Change 12, 2: 249--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Neil Brenner. 1997. State territorial restructuring and the production of spatial scale: Urban and regional planning in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1960--1990. Political Geography 16, 4: 273--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Perrine Chancerel, Max Marwede, Nils F. Nissen, and Klaus Dieter Lang. 2015. Estimating the quantities of critical metals embedded in ICT and consumer equipment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 98: 9--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Brett Christophers. 2011. Revisiting the Urbanization of Capital. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101, 6: 1347--1364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Barney Cohen. 2006. Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technology in society 28, 1: 63--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission. Urban development - Regional Policy - European Commission. Retrieved April 8, 2017 from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/themes/urban-development/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. European Commission. 2014. Smart Cities and Communities: About the partnership - What is it? Retrieved April 7, 2017 from http://ec.europa.eu/eip/smartcities/about-partnership/what-is-it/index_en.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Benjamin W Cramer. 2012. Man's need or man's greed: The human rights ramifications of green ICTs. Telematics and Informatics 29: 337--347. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Steven J Davis and Ken Caldeira. 2010. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 12: 5687--5692.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Richard Dobbs, Jaana Remes, James Manyika, Charles Roxburgh, Sven Smit, and Fabian Schaer. Urban world: Cities and the rise of the consuming class. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/urbanization/urban-world-cities-and-the-rise-of-the-consuming-classGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Anthony Downs. 2004. Still Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-Hour Traffic Congestion. The Brookings Institution, Washington.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. ECF. 2010. Roadmap 2050 A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO A PROSPEROUS, LOW-CARBON EUROPE. Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Reid Ewing, Gail Meakins, Grace Bjarnson, and Holly Hilton. 2011. Transportation and Land Use. In Making Healthy Places: Designing and Building for Health, Well-being, and Sustainability, Andrew L. Dannenberg, Howard Frumkin and Richard J. Jackson (eds.). Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, 149--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Susan S. Fainstein. 2008. Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32, 4: 768--785.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. John C Falcocchio and Herbert S Levinson. 2015. Road Traffic Congestion: A Concise Guide. Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sendy Farag and Glenn Lyons. 2012. To use or not to use? An empirical study of pre-trip public transport information for business and leisure trips and comparison with car travel. Transport Policy 20: 82--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Rebecca Gasper, Andrew Blohm, and Matthias Ruth. 2011. Social and economic impacts of climate change on the urban environment. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3, 3: 150--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Herbert Girardet. 2013. Towards the regenerative city. Expert Commission on Cities and Climate Change of the World Future Council.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Cedric Gossart. 2015. Rebound Effects and ICT: A Review of the Literature. In ICT innovations for sustainability, Lorenz M. Hilty and B. Aebischer (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 435--448.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A Greenfield. 2013. Against the smart city (The city is here for you to use, part I). Do Projects, New York City.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sue Grimmond. 2007. Urbanization and global environmental change: local effects of urban warming. The Geographical Journal 173, 1: 83--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Anders Gullberg. 2015. An Integrated Information and Payment Platform for urban transport. Stockholm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Stéphane Hallegatte, Nicola Ranger, Olivier Mestre, Patrice Dumas, Jan Corfee-Morlot, Celine Herweijer, and Robert Muir Wood. 2011. Assessing climate change impacts, sea level rise and storm surge risk in port cities: A case study on Copenhagen. Climatic Change 104, 1: 113--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Michelle Heacock, Carol Bain Kelly, Kwadwo Ansong Asante, Linda S Birnbaum, Åke Lennart Bergman, Marie-Noel Bruné, Irena Buka, David O Carpenter, Aimin Chen, and Xia Huo. 2016. E-Waste and Harm to Vulnerable Populations: A Growing Global Problem. Environmental health perspectives 124, 5: 550--555.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Richard Heinberg. 2010. Peak everything: Waking up to the century of declines. New Society Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Greger Henriksson. 2008. Stockholmarnas resvanor - mellan trängselskatt och klimatdebatt. Ph.D. thesis in Ethnology at Lund University. Published by KTH Royal Institute of Technology, TRITA-INFRA-FMS 2008:5, ISSN 1652--5442 (in Swedish with an extensive summary in English), Stockholm, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Lorenz Hilty. 2015. Computing Efficiency, Sufficiency, and Self-sufficiency: A Model for Sustainability? In Limits 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mike Hodson, Simon Marvin, Blake Robinson, and Mark Swilling. 2012. Reshaping Urban Infrastructure: Material Flow Analysis and Transitions Analysis in an Urban Context. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16, 6: 789--800.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Robert G. Hollands. 2008. Will the real smart city please stand up? City 12, 3: 303--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Mattias Höjer, Åsa Moberg, and Greger Henriksson. 2015. Digitalisering och hållbar konsumtion. Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Mattias Höjer and Josefin Wangel. 2015. Smart sustainable cities: definition and challenges. In ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Springer, 333--349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. IRP. 2013. Urban Resource Flows and the Governance of Infrastructure Transitions. Retrieved from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-development/news/urban-resource-flows-and-the-governanceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. ITU. Focus Group on Smart Sustainable Cities. Retrieved April 7, 2017 from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/ssc/Pages/default.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jane Jacobs. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Robert R Jakubek. 2015. Nonequivalent Quasi-Experimental Study of Wireless Telecommunication Traffic During Severe Winter Storms. IEEE Access 3: 1036--1041.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Rob Kitchin. 2014. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79, 1: 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Jacqueline M Klopp and Danielle L Petretta. 2017. The urban sustainable development goal: Indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities. Cities 63: 92--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Sekhar N Kondepudi and The International Telecommunication Union (ITU). 2014. Smart sustainable cities: An analysis of definitions . ITU-T Focus Group on Smart Sustainable Cities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Anna Kramers. 2014. Smart Cities and Climate Targets: Reducing cities' energy use with ICT and travel information.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Anna Kramers, Mattias Höjer, Nina Lövehagen, and Josefin Wangel. 2014. Smart sustainable cities--Exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities. Environmental Modelling & Software 56: 52--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Alexis Kwasinski. 2013. Effects of hurricanes Isaac and Sandy on data and communications power infrastructure. In Telecommunications Energy Conference-Smart Power and Efficiency (INTELEC), Proceedings of 2013 35th International, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Fabio Leccese. 2013. Remote-Control System of High Ef fi ciency and Intelligent Street Lighting Using a ZigBee Network of Devices and Sensors. Ieee Transactions on Power Delivery 28, 1: 21--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Duncan Maclennan and Julie Miao. 2017. Housing and Capital in the 21st Century. Housing, Theory and Society 6096, April: 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. A. Malm. 2016. Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. Verso Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. W.J. Mitchell. 1999. E-topia: "Urban life, Jim -- but not as we know it." MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Lewis Mumford. 2014. Cities and the Crisis of Civilization. In The Sustainable Urban Reader (Third), Stephen M Wheeler and Timothy Beatley (eds.). Routledge, New York, 20--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Paolo Neirotti, Alberto De Marco, Anna Corinna Cagliano, Giulio Mangano, and Francesco Scorrano. 2014. Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 38: 25--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Åsa Nyblom. 2014. Making travel sustainable with ICT? The social practice of travel planning and travel information use in everyday life. KTH Royal Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Daniel Pargman, Elina Eriksson, and Adrian Friday. 2016. Limits to the Sharing Economy. Limits. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Daniel Pargman and Barath Raghavan. 2014. Rethinking Sustainability in Computing: From Buzzword to Non-negotiable Limits. In NordiCHI, 638--647. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Chris Preist, Dan Schien, and Eli Blevis. 2016. Understanding and Mitigating the Effects of Device and Cloud Service Design Decisions on the Environmental Footprint of Digital Infrastructure. In CHI 2016, May 7--12, 1324--1337. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. PWC. 2011. Minerals and metals scarcity in manufacturing: the ticking timebomb Sustainable Materials Management. Pwc, 24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Barath Raghavan and Daniel Pargman. 2016. Refactoring Society : Systems Complexity in an Age of Limits. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Prof K Y Rajput, Gargeyee Khatav, Monica Pujari, and Priyanka Yadav. 2013. Intelligent Street Lighting System Using Gsm. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention 2, 3: 60--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. William Rees and Mathis Wackernagel. 1996. URBAN ECOLOGICAL F O O T P R I N T S?: W H Y CITIES CANNOT BE SUSTAINABLE AND WHY THEY. 16: 223--248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. T Ringenson and M Höjer. 2016. Smart City Planning and Environmental Aspects' Ict4s: 159--166. Retrieved from http://www.atlantis-press.com/php/download_paper.php?id=25860379Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Miriam Börjesson Rivera, Cecilia Håkansson, Åsa Svenfelt, and Göran Finnveden. 2014. Including second order effects in environmental assessments of ICT. Environmental Modelling & Software 56: 105--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. M Santamouris. 2014. On the energy impact of urban heat island and global warming on buildings. Energy and Buildings 82: 100--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Saskia Sassen. 2009. Human Settlement Development: The Central Role of Cities in Our Environment's Future - Constraints and Possibilities. UNESCO EOLSS I.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. David Satterthwaite. 2011. How urban societies can adapt to resource shortage and climate change. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences 369, 1942: 1762--1783.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Elizabeth Shove and Gordon Walker. 2010. Governing transistions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy 39: 471--476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Vaclav Smil. 2006. 21st century energy: Some sobering thoughts. OECD Observer, 258--259: 22--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Benjamin K. Sovacool and Marilyn A. Brown. 2010. Twelve metropolitan carbon footprints: A preliminary comparative global assessment. Energy Policy 38, 9: 4856--4869.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Yolande Strengers. 2014. Smart energy in everyday life: are you designing for resource man? interactions 21, 4: 24--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Örjan Svane. 2013. Energy Efficiency in Hammarby Sjöstad, Stockholm through ICT and smarter infrastructure -- survey and potentials. Ict4S 2013: 190--196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Joseph A. Tainter. 2011. Energy, complexity, and sustainability: A historical perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1, 1: 89--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Joel A. Tarr. 2002. The Metabolism of the Industrial City: The Case of Pittsburgh. Journal of Urban History 28, 5: 511--545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. K. T K Toh, P. Nagel, and R. Oakden. 2009. A business and ICT architecture for a logistics city. International Journal of Production Economics 122, 1: 216--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Anthony Townsend. 2013. Smart cities - big data, civic hackers and the quest for a New Utopia. Norton & Company, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Sherry Turkle. 2012. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Shakila Umair, Anna Björklund, and Elisabeth Ekener Petersen. 2015. Social impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan using UNEP SETAC guidelines. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 95: 46--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. UN-Habitat. 2016. Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/WCR- Full-Report-2016.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. UNDESA. 2016. The World's Cities in 2016 -- Data Booklet. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/the_worlds_cities_in_2016_data_booklet.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. United Nations News Centre. 2016. UN launches campaign to urge "smart" transition to sustainable cities. Retrieved April 7, 2017 from http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=54052#.WOdDm_mGO71Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Simona Vasilica Oprea. Informatics Solutions for Prosumers connected to Smart Grids. 12--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Åsa Waldo. 2002. Staden och resandet: Mötet mellan planering och vardagsliv. Sociologiska institutionen, Lunds universitet, Lund.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Alan Wiig and Elvin Wyly. 2016. Introduction: Thinking through the politics of the smart city.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Eric Williams. 2011. Environmental effects of information and communications technologies. Nature 479: 354--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. World Bank. 2016. World Urbanization Prospect Indicators. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTLGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Patrick A Wäger, Roland Hischier, and Rolf Widmer. 2015. The Material Basis of ICT. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Lorentz M Hilty and B. Aebischer (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 209--221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Jorge Luis Zapico, Marko Turpeinen, and Nils Brandt. 2009. Climate persuasive services': changing behavior towards low- carbon lifestyles. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology: 14:1--14:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Renata Zochowska and Grzegorz Karon. 2016. ITS Services Packages as a Tool for Managing Traffic Congestion in Cities. In Intelligent Transportation Systems -- Problems and Perspectives. Springer International Publishing, 81--103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Limits of the Smart Sustainable City

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      LIMITS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within Limits
      June 2017
      148 pages
      ISBN:9781450349505
      DOI:10.1145/3080556

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate11of17submissions,65%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader