skip to main content
10.1145/3085585.3085586acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswccceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How Can Learning Analytics Improve a Course?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite much excitement with learning analytics, there is still a lack of adoption in the classrooms. Possible reasons may include not having enough time to incorporate the use of analytics, not being familiar enough with specific techniques to readily apply them, or not knowing how data can help shape a curriculum or the classroom experience altogether. Learning analytics is a problem-driven research field, where the domain problem -- the people involved, the subject matter, and the learning environment -- drives the techniques and the solutions that are used. From this perspective, we propose a new framework with a suite of pedagogical questions that can be addressed using data to support decisions made about the curriculum or classroom structure. In addition, we present a case study with 69 participants in a CS1 course as a way to demonstrate how some of these questions are addressed. Our ultimate goal is to improve the quality of the students' learning experience using an evidence-based approach.

References

  1. Arnold, K.E., and Pistilli, M.D. 2012. Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proc. of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (LAK'12), pp. 267--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bichsel, J. 2012. Analytics in higher education: Benefits, barriers, progress, and recommendations: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Y. Cherenkova, D. Zingaro, and A. Petersen. Identifying Challenging CS1 Concepts in a Large Problem Dataset. 2014. In Proc. of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'14), 695--700. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Essa, A. and Ayad, H. 2012. Student success system: risk analytics and data visualization using ensembles of predictive models. In Proc. of the 2nd International conference on learning analytics and knowledge (LAK'12), 158--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. B. Fenwick, C. Norris, F. E. Barry, J. Rountree, C. J. Spicer, and S. D. Cheek. 2009. Another Look at the Behaviors of Novice Programmers. SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1):296--300, Mar. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ihantola, P., Vihavainen, A., Ahadi, A., Butler, M., Borstler, J. Edwards, S., Isohanni, E., Korhonen, A., Petersen, A., Rivers, K., Rubio, M.A., Sheard, J., Skupas, B., Spacco, J., Szabo, C., and Toll, D. 2016. Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics in Programming: Literature Review and Case Studies. In Proc. of the 20th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education on Working Group Reports (ITiCSE WGR'16), 41--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. C. Jadud. 2006. Methods and Tools for Exploring Novice Compilation Behaviour. In Proc. of the 2nd International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER'06), 73--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Majumdar, R. and Iyer, S. 2015. Beyond Clickers: Tracing Patterns in Students' Response through iSAT. In Proc. of the 23rd International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nixon, A.L. 2016. Reflecting on Learning Analytics: EDUCAUSE Review, (September/October 2016), 62--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Piech, C., Sahami, M., Koller, D., Cooper, S., and Blikstein, P. 2012. Modeling how students learn to program. In Proc. of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'12), 153--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Serral, E., De Weerdt, J., Sedrakyan, G., and Snoeck, M. 2016. Automating Immediate and Personalized Feedback. In Proc. of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Spacco, D. Fossati, J. Stamper, and K. Rivers. 2013. Towards Improving Programming Habits to Create Better Computer Science Course Outcomes. In Proc. of the 18th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE'13), 243--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., and Santos, J.L. 2013. Learning analytics dashboard applications. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10): 1500--1509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Watson, C., Li, F. W., and Godwin, J. L. 2013. Predicting performance in an introductory programming course by logging and analyzing student programming behavior. In Proc. of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 319--323. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. How Can Learning Analytics Improve a Course?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WCCCE '17: Proceedings of the 22nd Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education
      May 2017
      42 pages
      ISBN:9781450350662
      DOI:10.1145/3085585

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate78of117submissions,67%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader