skip to main content
10.1145/3102304.3102347acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicfndsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling Interference for Wireless Sensor Network Simulators

Published:19 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Low power wide area networks (LPWAN) are the enabling technologies for large scale wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Effective cost, long range and energy efficiency of LPWANs make them most suitable candidates for smart city applications. These technologies offer novel communication paradigm to address discrete IoT's applications.

This paper presents the integration of physical layers based on ZigBee, Wi-Fi, and LoRa into a wireless sensor network simulator CupCarbon for IoT's applications. We have restructured the operations of PHYs, so it can be flexible and scalable to exploit the system services.

References

  1. Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W.J., Sankarasubramaniam Y., and E. Cayirci, E., A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 102--114, (2002) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Shen, C., Srisathapornphat, C., and Jaikaeo, C., Sensor Information Networking Architecture and Applications. IEEE Pers. Commun., pp. 52--59, (2001)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Moe Z. Win, Pedro C. Pinto and Lawrence A. Shepp, A Mathematical Theory of Network Interference and Its Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE. vol.97, no. 2. pp.205--230, (2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Raj Jain, Channel Models: A Tutorial. WiMAX Forum AATG, (2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. IEEE Std. 802.15.4-2003. IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Specifications for LowRate Wireless Personal Area Networks. (2003)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs), Published by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IEEE, USA, (2003)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kurt S., Tavli B., Propagation model alternatives for outdoor Wireless Sensor Networks, ASELSAN Inc., Ankara, Turkey, (2013)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. O. A. Kalaa, W. Balid, N. Bitar, and H. H. Refai.: Evaluating bluetooth low energy in realistic wireless environments. pages 1--6 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhao Xiaohui Lei Yuan, Xiong construction. Wi-Fi based wireless sensor network design and research. pp. 18:192--197 (2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. L. Kleinrock and F. Tobagi. Packet switching in radio channels: Part I - carrier sense multiple-access modes and their throughput-delay characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 23(12), 1400--1416 (1975).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. U. Noreen and S. Baig. Modified incremental bit allocation algorithm for powerline communication in smart grids. In 2013 1st International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA), 1--6 (2013)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. U. Noreen, A. Bounceur, L. Clavier, and R. Kacimi.: Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 phy with impulsive network interference in cupcarbon simulator. International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), 1--6 (2016)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. IEEE draft standard for local and metropolitan area networks - part 15.4: Wireless medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications for low rate wireless personal area networks (wpans) amendment - physical layer (phy) specifications for low energy, critical infrastructure monitoring networks (lecim). 1--133 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks, part 15.4: Low-rate wireless personal area networks (lr-wpans). IEEE Std 802.15.4-2011 (Revision of IEEE Std. 802.15.4-2006), 1--314 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hui Li and Dan Yu.: Comparison of ad hoc and centralized multihop routing. 2:791--795 (2002)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Anis KOUBAA, Mario ALVES, Eduardo TOVAR. "IEEE 802.15.4 for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Technical Overview ". HURRAY-TR-050801 (2005)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. B. Reynders, W. Meert, and S. Pollin. Range and coexistence analysis of long range unlicensed communication. In 2016 23rd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT), 1--6 (2016)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Semtech. http://www.semtech.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Changsu Suh, Jung-Eun, et Joung Young-Bae Ko, New RF Models of the TinyOS Simulator for IEEE 802.15.4 Standard. Dept. of R and D, Hanback Electron. Co., Daejeon, (2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. cupcarbon. "CupCarbon: A Smart City and IoT Wireless Sensor Network Simulator", available at: http://www.cupcarbon.com (2016)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kamal Mehdi and Massinissa Lounis and Ahcene Bounceur and Tahar Kechadi. CupCarbon: A Multi-Agent and Discrete Event Wireless Sensor Network Design and Simulation Tool, In IEEE 7th International Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques (SIMUTools'14), Lisbon, Portugal, (2014) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Modeling Interference for Wireless Sensor Network Simulators

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICFNDS '17: Proceedings of the International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems
      July 2017
      325 pages
      ISBN:9781450348447
      DOI:10.1145/3102304

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 July 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader