skip to main content
10.1145/312624.312664acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Effective document presentation with a locality-based similarity heuristic

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 August 1999Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.J. Allan, L. Ballesteros, J. P. Callan, W. B. Croft, and Z. Lu. Recent experiments with INQUERY. In Harman {11}, pages 49-64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.V. N. Anh and A. Moffat. Compressed inverted files with reduced decoding overheads. In W. B. Croft, A. Moffat, C. J. van Rijsbergen, R. Wilkinson, and J. Zobel, editors, Proc. 21st Annual International A CM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 290-297, Melbourne, Australia, August 1998. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.N. J. Belkin, A. D. Narasimhalu, and P. Willett, editors. Proc. 20th Annual International A CM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Philadelphia, PA, July 1997. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.C. Buckley and A. F. Lewit. Optimization of inverted vector searches. In Proc. 8th Annual International A CM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 97-110, Montreal, Canada, June 1985. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.C. Buckley, A. Singhal, and M. Mitra. New retrieval approaches using SMART: TREC 4. In Harman {11}, pages 25-48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.C. L. A. Clarke, G. V. Cormack, and F. J. Burkowski. Shortest substring ranking (multitext experiments for TREC-4). In Harman {11}, pages 295-304.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.O. de Kretser and A. Moffat. Locality-based information retrieval. In J. Roddick, editor, Proc. 10th Australasian Database Conference, pages 177-188, Auckland, New Zealand, January 1999. Springer-Verlag, Singapore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.W. B. Frakes and R. Baeza-Yates, editors. Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.H.-P. Frei, D. Harman, P. Schguble, and R. Wilkinson, editors. Proc. 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Zfirich, Switzerland, August 1996. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.D. K. Harman. Overview of the second text retrieval conference (TREC-2). Information Processing ~4 Management, 31(3):271-289, May 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.D. K. Harman, editor. Proc. Fourth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-$), Gaithersburg, MD, November 1995. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 500-236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.D. K. Harman and G. Candela. Retrieving records from a gigabyte of text on a minicomputer using statistical ranking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(8):581-589, August 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. 13.D. Hawking and P. Thistlewaite. Proximity operators: So near and yet so far. In Harman {11}, pages 131-144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.D. Hawking and P. Thistlewaite. Relevance weighting using distance between term occurrences. Technical Report 96-08, Australian National University, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.M. A. Hearst and J. O. Pedersen. Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: Scatter/gather on retrieval results. In Frei et al. {9}, pages 76-84. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.M. Kaskiel and J. Zobel. Passage retrieval revisited. In Belkin et al. {3}, pages 178-185. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.D. Knaus, E. Mittendorf, P. Schguble, and P. Sheridan. Highlighting relevant passages for users of the interactive SPIDER retrieval system. In Harman {11}, pages 233-244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.R. R. Korfhage. Information Storage and Retrieval. Wiley, New York, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.MG public domain software for indexing and retrieving text, including tools for compressing text, bilevel images, grayscale images, and textual images, 1999. http ://www. cs. mu. oz. au/mg/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.A. Moffat and J. Zobel. Self-indexing inverted files for fast text retrieval. A CM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(4):349-379, October 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.L. T. Nowell, R. K. France, D. Hix, L. S. Heath, and E. A. Fox. Visualizing search results: Some alternatives to querydocument similarity. In Frei et al. {9}, pages 67-75. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.M. Persin, J. Zobel, and R. Sacks-Davis. Filtered document retrieval with frequency-sorted indexes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(10):749-764, October 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. 23.G. Salton and M. J. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.A. Singhal, C. Buckley, and M. Mitra. Pivoted document length normalization. In Frei et al. {9}, pages 21-29. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.C. J. van Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London, second edition, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.A. Veerasamy and N. J. Belkin. Evaluation of a tool for visualization of information retrieval results. In Frei et al. {9}, pages 85-92. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.A. Veerasamy and R. Heikes. Effectiveness of a graphical display of retrieval results. In Belkin et al. {3}, pages 236- 245. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.I. H. Witten, A. Moffat, and T. C. Bell. Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and Indexing Documents and Images. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, second edition, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.J. Zobel and A. Moffat. Exploring the similarity space. A CM SIGIR Forum, 32(1):18-34, Spring 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. 30.J. Zobel, A. Moffat, R. Wilkinson, and R. Sacks-Davis. Efficient retrieval of partial documents. Information Processing ~4 Management, 31(3):361-377, May 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Effective document presentation with a locality-based similarity heuristic

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '99: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
        August 1999
        339 pages
        ISBN:1581130961
        DOI:10.1145/312624

        Copyright © 1999 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 August 1999

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '99 Paper Acceptance Rate33of135submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader