skip to main content
research-article

EarBit: Using Wearable Sensors to Detect Eating Episodes in Unconstrained Environments

Published:11 September 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Chronic and widespread diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia require patients to monitor their food intake, and food journaling is currently the most common method for doing so. However, food journaling is subject to self-bias and recall errors, and is poorly adhered to by patients. In this paper, we propose an alternative by introducing EarBit, a wearable system that detects eating moments. We evaluate the performance of inertial, optical, and acoustic sensing modalities and focus on inertial sensing, by virtue of its recognition and usability performance. Using data collected in a simulated home setting with minimum restrictions on participants’ behavior, we build our models and evaluate them with an unconstrained outside-the-lab study. For both studies, we obtained video footage as ground truth for participants activities. Using leave-one-user-out validation, EarBit recognized all the eating episodes in the semi-controlled lab study, and achieved an accuracy of 90.1% and an F1-score of 90.9% in detecting chewing instances. In the unconstrained, outside-the-lab evaluation, EarBit obtained an accuracy of 93% and an F1-score of 80.1% in detecting chewing instances. It also accurately recognized all but one recorded eating episodes. These episodes ranged from a 2 minute snack to a 30 minute meal.

References

  1. Oliver Amft, Mathias Stäger, Paul Lukowicz, and Gerhard Tröster. 2005. Analysis of Chewing Sounds for Dietary Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’05). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 56--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. O. Amft and G. Troster. 2006. Methods for Detection and Classification of Normal Swallowing from Muscle Activation and Sound. In 2006 Pervasive Health Conference and Workshops. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Oliver Amft and Gerhard Tröster. 2008. Recognition of dietary activity events using on-body sensors. Artificial intelligence in medicine 42, 2 (2008), 121--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ling Bao and Stephen S Intille. 2004. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Lindsay T Bartholome, Roseann E Peterson, Susan K Raatz, and Nancy C Raymond. 2013. A comparison of the accuracy of self-reported intake with measured intake of a laboratory overeating episode in overweight and obese women with and without binge eating disorder. European journal of nutrition 52, 1 (2013), 193--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Abdelkareem Bedri, Apoorva Verlekar, Edison Thomaz, Valerie Avva, and Thad Starner. 2015. Detecting Mastication: A Wearable Approach. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 247--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Abdelkareem Bedri, Apoorva Verlekar, Edison Thomaz, Valerie Avva, and Thad Starner. 2015. A Wearable System for Detecting Eating Activities with Proximity Sensors in the Outer Ear. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Marianne Bertrand and Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach. 2009. Time use and food consumption. The American Economic Review 99, 2 (2009), 170--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Y. Bi, M. Lv, C. Song, W. Xu, N. Guan, and W. Yi. 2016. AutoDietary: A Wearable Acoustic Sensor System for Food Intake Recognition in Daily Life. IEEE Sensors Journal 16, 3 (Feb 2016), 806--816.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sheelagh Carpendale. 2008. Evaluating information visualizations. In Information Visualization. Springer, 19--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Junghoon Chae, Insoo Woo, SungYe Kim, Ross Maciejewski, Fengqing Zhu, Edward J. Delp, Carol J. Boushey, and David S. Ebert. 2011. Volume estimation using food specific shape templates in mobile image-based dietary assessment. In Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jungman Chung, Jungmin Chung, Wonjun Oh, Yongkyu Yoo, Won Gu Lee, and Hyunwoo Bang. 2017. A glasses-type wearable device for monitoring the patterns of food intake and facial activity. Scientific Reports 7 (2017), 41690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Y. Dong, J. Scisco, M. Wilson, E. Muth, and A. Hoover. 2014. Detecting Periods of Eating During Free-Living by Tracking Wrist Motion. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 18, 4 (July 2014), 1253--1260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. M. Fontana, M. Farooq, and E. Sazonov. 2014. Automatic Ingestion Monitor: A Novel Wearable Device for Monitoring of Ingestive Behavior. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 61, 6 (June 2014), 1772--1779.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Adam Fouse, Nadir Weibel, Edwin Hutchins, and James D. Hollan. 2011. ChronoViz: A System for Supporting Navigation of Time-coded Data. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 299--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Y. Gao, N. Zhang, H. Wang, X. Ding, X. Ye, G. Chen, and Y. Cao. 2016. iHear Food: Eating Detection Using Commodity Bluetooth Headsets. In 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE). 163--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. H. Kalantarian, N. Alshurafa, and M. Sarrafzadeh. 2017. A Survey of Diet Monitoring Technology. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 1 (Jan 2017), 57--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nicky Kern, Bernt Schiele, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2003. Multi-sensor activity context detection for wearable computing. In European Symposium on Ambient Intelligence. Springer, 220--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. M. Khan, Y. K. Lee, S. Y. Lee, and T. S. Kim. 2010. A Triaxial Accelerometer-Based Physical-Activity Recognition via Augmented-Signal Features and a Hierarchical Recognizer. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 14, 5 (Sept 2010), 1166--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Julie A. Kientz, Shwetak N. Patel, Brian Jones, Ed Price, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2008. The Georgia Tech Aware Home. In CHI ’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3675--3680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2010. Research methods in human-computer interaction. John Wiley 8 Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Liu, E. Johns, L. Atallah, C. Pettitt, B. Lo, G. Frost, and G. Z. Yang. 2012. An Intelligent Food-Intake Monitoring System Using Wearable Sensors. In 2012 Ninth International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks. 154--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Matos, S. S. Birring, I. D. Pavord, and H. Evans. 2006. Detection of cough signals in continuous audio recordings using hidden Markov models. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 53, 6 (June 2006), 1078--1083.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. E Mcgrath. 1995. Methodology matters: Doing research in the behavioral and social sciences. In Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000 (2nd ed. Citeseer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mark Mirtchouk, Christopher Merck, and Samantha Kleinberg. 2016. Automated estimation of food type and amount consumed from body-worn audio and motion sensors. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 451--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Dan Morris, T Scott Saponas, Andrew Guillory, and Ilya Kelner. 2014. RecoFit: using a wearable sensor to find, recognize, and count repetitive exercises. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3225--3234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sean A Munson and Sunny Consolvo. 2012. Exploring goal-setting, rewards, self-monitoring, and sharing to motivate physical activity. In 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops. IEEE, 25--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Temiloluwa Olubanjo and Maysam Ghovanloo. 2014. Real-time swallowing detection based on tracheal acoustics. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 4384--4388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. T. Olubanjo and M. Ghovanloo. 2014. Tracheal activity recognition based on acoustic signals. In 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 1436--1439.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sebastian Päßler, Matthias Wolff, and Wolf-Joachim Fischer. 2012. Food intake monitoring: an acoustical approach to automated food intake activity detection and classification of consumed food. Physiological measurement 33, 6 (2012), 1073.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Temiloluwa Prioleau, Elliot Moore, and Maysam Ghovanloo. 2017. Unobtrusive and Wearable Systems for Automatic Dietary Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Pavel Pudil, Jana Novovičová, and Josef Kittler. 1994. Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern recognition letters 15, 11 (1994), 1119--1125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Shah Atiqur Rahman, Christopher Merck, Yuxiao Huang, and Samantha Kleinberg. 2015. Unintrusive eating recognition using Google Glass. In Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2015 9th International Conference on. IEEE, 108--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Tauhidur Rahman, Alexander Travis Adams, Mi Zhang, Erin Cherry, Bobby Zhou, Huaishu Peng, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2014. BodyBeat: a mobile system for sensing non-speech body sounds.. In MobiSys, Vol. 14. 2--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Edison Thomaz, Irfan Essa, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2015. A Practical Approach for Recognizing Eating Moments with Wrist-mounted Inertial Sensing. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1029--1040. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Tri Vu, Feng Lin, Nabil Alshurafa, and Wenyao Xu. 2017. Wearable Food Intake Monitoring Technologies: A Comprehensive Review. Computers 6, 1 (2017), 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Chang Xu, Ye He, Nitin Khannan, Albert Parra, Carol Boushey, and Edward Delp. 2013. Image-based food volume estimation. Int. Workshop on Multimedia for Cooking 8 Eating Activities (CEA) (2013), 75--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Koji Yatani and Khai N Truong. 2012. Bodyscope: a wearable acoustic sensor for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 341--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Koji Yatani and Khai N Truong. 2012. BodyScope: a wearable acoustic sensor for activity recognition. UbiComp ’12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (2012), 341--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Rui Zhang and Oliver Amft. 2016. Bite Glasses: Measuring Chewing Using Emg and Bone Vibration in Smart Eyeglasses. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 50--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Rui Zhang and Oliver Amft. 2016. Regular-look eyeglasses can monitor chewing. In Int. Joint Conf. on Pervasive 8 Ubiquitous Computing. 389--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Rui Zhang, Severin Bernhart, and Oliver Amft. 2016. Diet eyeglasses: Recognising food chewing using EMG and smart eyeglasses. In Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN), 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on. IEEE, 7--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. EarBit: Using Wearable Sensors to Detect Eating Episodes in Unconstrained Environments

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
            Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 3
            September 2017
            2023 pages
            EISSN:2474-9567
            DOI:10.1145/3139486
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 11 September 2017
            • Accepted: 1 June 2017
            • Revised: 1 May 2017
            • Received: 1 February 2017
            Published in imwut Volume 1, Issue 3

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader