skip to main content
10.1145/3132446.3134891acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Integrating Mimic Joints into Dynamics Algorithms: Exemplified by the Hybrid Recupera Exoskeleton

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The design of various robots in industrial and academic contexts integrates closed loops to improve the mechanical stiffness in comparison with purely serial or tree-type topologies. In particular, planar kinematic loops as parallelograms or double parallelograms are employed in such hybrid robots. Since these systems are geometrically overconstrained in the group of spatial Euclidean motions, the computational performance and numerical accuracy of any model-based dynamics software is negatively affected. This paper introduces a novel method to avoid these numerical issues for any hybrid system with loops that can be characterized by the concept of linear mimic joints: these are passive joints which depend on an active joint in a closed loop in a linear manner. With the proposed approach, the loop closure functions are automatically composed from the robot description file and integrated into the analytical equations for solving the forward and the inverse dynamics problems. The paper illustrates the application of this method for a novel shoulder mechanism containing a planar six bar mechanism that has been designed for the Recupera whole-body exoskeleton.

References

  1. Bertold Bongardt. 2011. CAD-2-SIM -- Kinematic Modeling of Mechanisms Based on the Sheth-Uicker Convention. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 465--477. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bertold Bongardt. 2013. Sheth Uicker convention revisited. Mechanism and Machine Theory 69 (2013), 200 -- 229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Keith W. Buffinton. 2005. Robotics and Automation Handbook. CRC Press, Chapter Kane's Method in Robotics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Günter Dittrich and Volker Wehn. 1989. Öffnungsmechanismus einer PKW-Motorhaube: 602. Der Konstrukteur: Magazin für Konstruktion und Entwicklung (1989).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Roy Featherstone. 2008. Rigid Body Dynamics Algorithm. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Martin L. Felis. 2017. RBDL: an efficient rigid-body dynamics library using recursive algorithms. Autonomous Robots 41, 2 (2017), 495--511. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Gautier, W. Khalil, and P. P. Restrepo. 1995. Identification of the dynamic parameters of a closed loop robot. In Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 3. 3045--3050 vol.3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Denavit Hartenberg and Richard Scheunemann. 1955. A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices. Trans ASME J. Appl. Mech. (1955).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Abhinandan Jain. 2011. Robot and Multibody Dynamics: Analysis and Algorithms. Springer Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wisama Khalil and Etienne Dombre. 2002. Modeling, Identification and Control of Robots (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis, Inc., Bristol, PA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. W. Khalil and J. Kleinfinger. 1986. A new geometric notation for open and closed-loop robots. In Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 3. 1174--1179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Elsa Andrea Kirchner, Niels Will, Marc Simnofske, Luis Manuel Vaca Benitez, Bertold Bongardt, Mario Michael Krell, Shivesh Kumar, Martin Mallwitz, Anett Seeland, Marc Tabie, Hendrik Wöhrle, Mehmed Yüksel, Anke Heß, Rüdiger Buschfort, and Frank Kirchner. 2016. Recupera-Reha: Exoskeleton Technology with Integrated Biosignal Analysis for Sensorimotor Rehabilitation. In Transdisziplinäre Konferenz SmartASSIST. 504--517.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shivesh Kumar, Bertold Bongardt, Marc Simnofske, and Frank Kirchner. 2016. Task space controller for the novel Active Ankle mechanism. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation for Humanitarian Applications, December 18--20, Amritapuri, India (RAHA 2016 Poster Proceedings). 22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Shivesh Kumar, Abhilash Nayak, Bertold Bongardt, Andreas Mueller, and Frank Kirchner. 2018. Kinematic Analysis of Active Ankle Using Computational Algebraic Geometry. In Computational Kinematics, Saïd Zeghloul, Lotfi Romdhane, and Med Amine Laribi (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 117--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin Lesser. 1992. A Geometrical Interpretation of Kane's Equations. Proceedings: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 436, 1896 (1992), 69--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Paul RC Luh JS, Walker MW. 1980. On-Line Computational Scheme for Mechanical Manipulators. ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. (1980).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin Mallwitz, Niels Will, Johannes Teiwes, and Elsa Andrea Kirchner. 2015. The CAPIO Active Upper Body Exoskeleton and its Application for Teleoperation. In Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation. ESA/Estec Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation (ASTRA-2015). ESA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Andreas Mueller. 2014. Implementation of a Geometric Constraint Regularization for Multibody System Models. Arch. Mech. Eng. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. Naidu, R. Stopforth, G. Bright, and S. Davrajh. 2011. A 7 DOF exoskeleton arm: Shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand mechanism for assistance to upper limb disabled individuals. In AFRICON, 2011. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. C. Piedboeuf. 1993. Kane's equations or Jourdain's principle?. In Proceedings of 36th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems. 1471--1474 vol.2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. CG Rajeevlochana, SK Saha, and S Kumar. 2012. Automatic extraction of DH parameters of serial manipulators using line geometry. In The 2nd International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A.B. Koteswara Rao, S.K. Saha, and P.V.M. Rao. 2006. Dynamics Modelling of Hexaslides using the Decoupled Natural Orthogonal Complement Matrices. Multibody System Dynamics 15, 2 (2006), 159--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Marc Simnofske, Shivesh Kumar, Bertold Bongardt, and Frank Kirchner. 2016. Active Ankle - an Almost-Spherical Parallel Mechanism. In 47th International Symposium on Robotics (ISR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Minh To and Phil Webb. 2012. An Improved Kinematic Model for Calibration of Serial Robots Having Closed-chain Mechanisms. Robotica 30, 6 (Oct. 2012), 963--971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Yousuf, W. Lehman, M. A. Mustafa, and M. M. Hayder. 2015. Introducing Kinematics with Robot Operating System (ROS). In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AIR '17: Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Conference on Advances in Robotics
    June 2017
    325 pages
    ISBN:9781450352949
    DOI:10.1145/3132446

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 June 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader