skip to main content
10.1145/3132847.3132864acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tone Analyzer for Online Customer Service: An Unsupervised Model with Interfered Training

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Emotion analysis of online customer service conservation is important for good user experience and customer satisfaction. However, conventional metrics do not fit this application scenario. In this work, by collecting and labeling online conversations of customer service on Twitter, we identify 8 new metrics, named as tones, to describe emotional information. To better interpret each tone, we extend the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model to Tone LDA (T-LDA). In T-LDA, each latent topic is explicitly associated with one of three semantic categories, i.e., tone-related, domain-specific and auxiliary. By integrating tone label into learning, T-LDA can interfere the original unsupervised training process and thus is able to identify representative tone-related words. In evaluation, T-LDA shows better performance than baselines in predicting tone intensity. Also, a case study is conducted to analyze each tone via T-LDA output.

References

  1. Jennifer L Aaker. 1997. Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of marketing research (1997), 347--356.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Apoorv Agarwal, Boyi Xie, Ilia Vovsha, Owen Rambow, and Rebecca Passonneau. 2011. Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In Proceedings of the workshop on languages in social media. Association for Computational Linguistics, 30--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. David Andrzejewski and Xiaojin Zhu. 2009. Latent dirichlet allocation with topic-in-set knowledge Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2009 Workshop on Semi-Supervised Learning for Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 43--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research Vol. 3, Jan (2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Johan Bollen, Huina Mao, and Xiaojun Zeng. 2011. Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of computational science Vol. 2, 1 (2011), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Laurence Devillers, Lori Lamel, and Ioana Vasilescu. 2003. Emotion detection in task-oriented spoken dialogues Multimedia and Expo, 2003. ICME'03. Proceedings. 2003 International Conference on, Vol. Vol. 3. IEEE, III--549. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brian Dickinson and Wei Hu. 2015. Sentiment analysis of investor opinions on twitter. Social Networking, Vol. 4, 03 (2015), 62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hans Jurgen Eysenck. 1953. The structure of human personality. (1953).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jonathan Gratch and Stacy Marsella. 2001. Tears and fears: Modeling emotions and emotional behaviors in synthetic agents Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents. ACM, 278--285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L Jean Harrison-Walker. 2001. The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. Journal of service research Vol. 4, 1 (2001), 60--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jagadeesh Jagarlamudi, Hal Daumé III, and Raghavendra Udupa. 2012. Incorporating lexical priors into topic models. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 204--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Simon Lacoste-Julien, Fei Sha, and Michael I Jordan. 2009. DiscLDA: Discriminative learning for dimensionality reduction and classification Advances in neural information processing systems. 897--904. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jon D Mcauliffe and David M Blei. 2008. Supervised topic models. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 121--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Keith B Murray. 1991. A test of services marketing theory: consumer information acquisition activities. The journal of marketing (1991), 10--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Richard L Oliver. 1997. Emotional expression in the satisfaction response. Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer (1997), 291--325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. James W Pennebaker, Martha E Francis, and Roger J Booth. 2001. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Vol. 71, 2001 (2001), 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosalind Wright Picard. 1995. Affective computing. (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Daniel Ramage, David Hall, Ramesh Nallapati, and Christopher D Manning. 2009. Labeled LDA: A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 1-Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguistics, 248--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Daniel Ramage, Christopher D Manning, and Susan Dumais. 2011. Partially labeled topic models for interpretable text mining Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 457--465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Timothy N Rubin, America Chambers, Padhraic Smyth, and Mark Steyvers. 2012. Statistical topic models for multi-label document classification. Machine learning, Vol. 88, 1 (2012), 157--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sebastian Schuster and Christopher D Manning. 2016. Enhanced english universal dependencies: An improved representation for natural language understanding tasks. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Amy K Smith and Ruth N Bolton. 2002. The effect of customers' emotional responses to service failures on their recovery effort evaluations and satisfaction judgments. Journal of the academy of marketing science, Vol. 30, 1 (2002), 5--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Maite Taboada, Julian Brooke, Milan Tofiloski, Kimberly Voll, and Manfred Stede. 2011. Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational linguistics Vol. 37, 2 (2011), 267--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mike Thelwall, Kevan Buckley, Georgios Paltoglou, Di Cai, and Arvid Kappas. 2010. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 61, 12 (2010), 2544--2558. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yang Wang, Payam Sabzmeydani, and Greg Mori. 2007. Semi-latent dirichlet allocation: A hierarchical model for human action recognition. Human Motion--Understanding, Modeling, Capture and Animation (2007), 240--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Anbang Xu and Brian Bailey. 2012. A reference-based scoring model for increasing the findability of promising ideas in innovation pipelines. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 1183--1186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Anbang Xu, Zhe Liu, Yufan Guo, Vibha Sinha, and Rama Akkiraju. 2017. A New Chatbot for Customer Service on Social Media Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). 3506--3510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Peifeng Yin, Nilam Ram, Wang-Chien Lee, Conrad Tucker, Shashank Khandelwal, and Marcel Salathé. 2014. Two sides of a coin: Separating personal communication and public dissemination accounts in Twitter. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Springer, 163--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Jun Zhu, Amr Ahmed, and Eric P Xing. 2009. MedLDA: maximum margin supervised topic models for regression and classification Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning. ACM, 1257--1264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tone Analyzer for Online Customer Service: An Unsupervised Model with Interfered Training

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      November 2017
      2604 pages
      ISBN:9781450349185
      DOI:10.1145/3132847

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 November 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate171of855submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader