skip to main content
10.1145/313451.313534acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Query localization techniques for on-demand routing protocols in ad hoc networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 August 1999Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.I. F. Akyildiz, J. S. M. Ho, and Y.-B. Lin. Movementbased location update and selective paging for PCS network. IEEB/ACM 7Yansactions on Networking, 4(4):629-638, August 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.C. Alaettinoglu, A. U. Shankax, K. Dussa-Zieger, and I. Matta. Design and implementation of MARS: A routing testbed. Journal of Internetworking: Research and Experience, 5(1):17-41, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.J. Broch, D. A. Maltz, D. B. Johnson, Y-C. Hu, and J. Jetcheva. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In Proceedings of the j th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (,4 CM MOBICOM'98), pages 85-97, October 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Josh Broch, David Johnson, and David Maltz. The dynamic source routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks, http://w."~, ietf. org/internet-dr aft $ / draft-ietf-manet-dsr-01.txt, Dec 1998. iETF Internet Draft.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.K. Carlberg and J. Crowcroft. Building shared trees using a one-to-many joining mechanism. A CM Computer Communication Review, pages 5-11, January 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.S. Chen and K. Nahrstedt. Distributed QoS routing with imprecise state information. In 7th Int. Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks (IC3N), October 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.S.R. Das, R. Castaneda, J. Yan, and R. Sengupta. Comparative performance evaluation of routing protocols for mobile, ad hoc networks. In 7th Int. Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks (IC3N), pages 153-161, October 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.J. Haarsten et. al. Bluetooth: Vision, goals, and architecture. A CM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 2(4):38-45, Oct 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.K. J. Negus et. al. HomeRF and SWAP: Wireless networking for the connected home. A CM SIGMO- BILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 2(4):28-37, Oct 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Z. j. Haas and M. R. Pearlman. The performance of query control schemes for the zone routing protocol. In Proceedings of A CM SIGCOMM'98 Conference, pages 167-177, Vancouver, Sept. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.D. Johnson and D. Maltz. Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In T. Imielinski and H. Korth, editors, Mobile computing. Kluwer Academic, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.John Jubin and Janet D. Tornow. The DARPA packet radio network protocols. Proceedings of the IEEE, 75(1):21-32, January 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. 13.S. Keshav. An Engineering Approach to Computer Networking: A TM Networks, the Internet, and the Telephone Network, chapter 11. Addison-Wesley, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Y. Ko and N. H. Vaidya. Location-aided routing (LAR) in mobile ad hoc networks. In A CM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM), pages 66-75, November 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.J. Macker and S. Corson. Mobile ad hoc networks (MANET). http: //w~-w.ietf. org/ html.charters /manet-charter.html, 1997. IETF Working Group Charter.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Charles Perkins and Elizabeth Royer. Ad hoc on demand distance vector (AODV) routing, http: //w.~. ietf. org/internet-draft $ / draft-ietf-manet-aodv-02, txt, November 1998. IETF Internet Draft. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Charles Perkins and Elizabeth Royer. Ad hoc ondemand distance vector routing. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pages 90-100, Feb 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.N. Schacham and J. Westcott. Future directions in packet radio architectures and protocols. Proceedings o/the IEEE, 75(1):83-99, Jan 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. 19.A. U. Shankar, C. Alaettinoglu, K. Dussa-Zieger, and I. Matta. Transient and steady-state performance of routing protocols: Distance-vector versus link-state. Journal of Internetworking: Research and Experience, 6:59-87, 1995. (Preliminary version appeared in Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS/PERFORMANCE Conf., 1992, pages 181-192.). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.R. Sivakumar, P. Sinha, and V. Bharghavan. Core extraction distributed ad hoc routing (CEDAR) specification, http: //vvv. ietf.org/ internet-drafts/ draft-iet f-manet-zone-cedar-00, txt, October 1998. iETF Internet Draft.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Query localization techniques for on-demand routing protocols in ad hoc networks

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  MobiCom '99: Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking
                  August 1999
                  279 pages
                  ISBN:1581131429
                  DOI:10.1145/313451

                  Copyright © 1999 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 August 1999

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  MobiCom '99 Paper Acceptance Rate28of170submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader