skip to main content
10.1145/3150928.3150932acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvaluetoolsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Markovian Modeling of Wireless Trace Data

Published:05 December 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the increased availability of wireless networks, performance evaluation of these networks has become more important in recent years. Adequate models of wireless networks have to account for the user mobility as the movements of the users can have a large influence on the network performance. In many cases data recorded from real networks serves as basis to model the user mobility. Therefore, appropriate distributions have to be found to model characteristics like dwelltimes from the real world data and different general distributions like Lognormal, Weibull or Pareto have been used in the past. In this paper we present an extensive comparison for the fitting quality of those general distributions with Phase-type distributions (PHDs). Our results suggest that in most cases even small PHDs with four or five states yield a better approximation of the real data than the general distributions.

References

  1. S. Asmussen, O. Nerman, and M. Olsson. 1996. Fitting phase type distributions via the EM algorithm. Scand. J. Statist 23 (1996), 419--441.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Balachandran, G.M. Voelker, P. Bahl, and P. Rangan. 2002. Characterizing User Behavior and Network Performance in a Public Wireless LAN. In Proc. of SIGMETRICS '02. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. F. Bause, P. Buchholz, and J. Kriege. 2010. ProFiDo - The Processes Fitting Toolkit Dortmund. In Proc. of QEST 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Bobbio, A. Horváth, and M. Telek. 2005. Matching Three Moments with Minimal Acyclic Phase Type Distributions. Stochastic Models 21, 2--3 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. P. Buchholz. 2003. An EM-Algorithm for MAP Fitting from Real Traffic Data. In Computer Performance Evaluation / TOOLS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. P. Buchholz and J. Kriege. 2014. Markov Modeling of Availability and Unavailability Data. In Proc. of EDCC 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Buchholz, J. Kriege, and I. Felko. 2014. Input Modeling with Phase-Type Distributions and Markov Models - Theory and Applications. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Delignette-Muller and C. Dutang. 2015. fitdistrplus: An R Package for Fitting Distributions. Journal of Statistical Software 64, 4 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. W. Gao and G. Cao. 2010. Fine-grained Mobility Characterization: Steady and Transient State Behaviors. In Proc. of MobiHoc '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. Henderson, D. Kotz, and I. Abyzov. 2008. The changing usage of a mature campus-wide wireless network. Computer Networks 52, 14 (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Horváth and M. Telek. 2007. Matching more than three moments with acyclic phase type distributions. Stochastic Models 23 (2007), 167--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. G. Horváth. 2013. Moment Matching-Based Distribution Fitting with Generalized Hyper-Erlang Distributions. In Proc. of ASMTA '13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. W. Hsu and A. Helmy. 2005. IMPACT: Investigation of Mobile-user Patterns Across University Campuses using WLAN Trace Analysis. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Hui, A. Chaintreau, J. Scott, R. Gass, J. Crowcroft, and C. Diot. 2005. Pocket Switched Networks and Human Mobility in Conference Environments. In Proc. of WDTN' 05. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. B. Javadi, D. Kondo, A. Iosup, and D. H. J. Epema. 2013. The Failure Trace Archive: Enabling the comparison of failure measurements and models of distributed systems. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 73, 8 (2013), 1208--1223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Kim, D. Kotz, and S. Kim. 2006. Extracting a Mobility Model from Real User Traces. In Proc. of INFOCOM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Kondo, B. Javadi, A. Iosup, and D. H. J. Epema. 2010. The Failure Trace Archive: Enabling Comparative Analysis of Failures in Diverse Distributed Systems. In CCGRID. IEEE, 398--407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Kotz and K. Essien. 2005. Analysis of a Campus-Wide Wireless Network. Wireless Networks 11, 1 (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Kotz and T. Henderson. 2005. CRAWDAD: A Community Resource for Archiving Wireless Data at Dartmouth. IEEE Pervasive Computing 4, 4 (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. P. L. L'Ecuyer, L. Meliani, and J. Vaucher. 2002. SSJ: a framework for stochastic simulation in Java. In Proc. of WSC'02. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. D. Lelescu, U. Kozat, R. Jain, and M. Balakrishnan. 2006. Model T++: An Empirical Joint Space-time Registration Model. In Proc. of MobiHoc '06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. W. Navidi and T. Camp. 2004. Stationary distributions for random waypoint models. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. F. Neuts. 1979. A versatile Markovian point process. Journ. of Appl. Prob. (1979).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. P. Reinecke, T. Krauß, and K. Wolter. 2012. HyperStar: Phase-Type Fitting Made Easy. In Proc. of QEST'12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. I. Rhee, M. Shin, S. Hong, K. Lee, S.J. Kim, and S. Chong. 2011. On the Levy-Walk Nature of Human Mobility. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 19, 3 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. D. Tang and M. Baker. 2000. Analysis of a Local-area Wireless Network. In Proc. of MobiCom '00. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. A. Thümmler, P. Buchholz, and M. Telek. 2006. A Novel Approach for Phase-Type Fitting with the EM Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Dep. Sec. Comput. 3, 3 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. C. Tuduce and T.R. Gross. 2005. A mobility model based on WLAN traces and its validation. In Proc. of INFOCOM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Yoon, B.D. Noble, M. Liu, and M. Kim. 2006. Building realistic mobility models from coarse-grained traces. In Proc. of MobiSys. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Markovian Modeling of Wireless Trace Data

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            VALUETOOLS 2017: Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools
            December 2017
            268 pages
            ISBN:9781450363464
            DOI:10.1145/3150928

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 5 December 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate90of196submissions,46%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader