skip to main content
10.1145/3159450.3159474acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding Professional Identities and Goals of Computer Science Undergraduate Students

Published:21 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Understanding professional goals and identities of undergraduate Computer Science (CS) students is critical for curriculum decisions, workforce development, and retention programs. This paper aims to explore the ways in which undergraduate CS students describe their professional goals and identities, and gauge how these goals and identities vary across gender and academic standing. This paper is part of a larger study aimed at understanding how students form their professional goals and identities. In the study presented in this paper, we surveyed 109 CS undergraduate students and interviewed 14 CS undergraduate students across gender and academic standing. The data were qualitatively analyzed using inductive coding and thematic analysis. Our findings indicate that most students identify themselves professionally as software development professionals, various specialized CS professionals, and by their majors. We also found that both male and female students were interested in becoming entrepreneurs, and females were more likely to have professional goals to move into management. This paper contributes to the fields' growing knowledge of undergraduate students' professional goals and professional identities. This knowledge can help CS departments to better align their degree programs, curriculum, and specialization tracks with student goals. Such an alignment has the potential to increase retention in the major as well as prepare students to be competitive in the workforce.

References

  1. Bank, B.J., Delamont, S. and Marshall, C. 2007. Gender and Education: An Encyclopedia. Westport, Conn : Praeger Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Biggers, M., Brauer, A. and Yilmaz, T. 2008. Student Perceptions of Computer Science?: A Retention Study Comparing Graduating Seniors with CS Leavers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 40, 1 (March 2008), 402--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Employment Projections: https://data.bls.gov/projections/occupationProj. Accessed: 2017--10--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kinnunen, P., Butler, M., Morgan, M., Nylen, A., Peters, A.-K., Sinclair, J., Kalvala, S. and Pesonen, E. 2016. Understanding initial undergraduate expectations and identity in computing studies. European Journal of Engineering Education. (Feb. 2016), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kroger, J. and Green, K.E. 1996. Events associated with identity status change. Journal of Adolescence. 19, 5, (1996), 359--380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Learning in doing. 95, (1991), 138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. make it matter | EngageCSEdu: https://www.engage-csedu.org/engagement/make-it-matter. Accessed: 2017-09-02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Marcia, J.E. 1966. Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 3, 5 (1966), 551--558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. McCartney, R. and Sanders, K. 2015. School/Work: Development of Computing Students' Professional Identity at University. Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research - ICER '15 (New York, New York, USA, 2015), 151--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Schwartz, S., Luyckx, K. and Vignoles, V. 2011. Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tamer, B. and Jane, S. 2016. Recruitment and Retention of Undergraduate Students in Computing: Patterns by Gender and Race/Ethnicity. Available from: http://cra.org/cerp/research-findings/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and IEEE Computer Society. 2013. Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science. ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Professional Identities and Goals of Computer Science Undergraduate Students

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 2018
      1174 pages
      ISBN:9781450351034
      DOI:10.1145/3159450

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 February 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate161of459submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader