skip to main content
10.1145/3159450.3159586acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

Computational Thinking for All: An Experience Report on Scaling up Teaching Computational Thinking to All Students in a Major City in Sweden

Published:21 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Swedish government has recently introduced digital competence including programming in the Swedish K-9 curriculum starting no later than fall 2018. This means that 100 000 teachers need to learn programming and digital competence in less than a year. In this paper we report on our experience working with professional teacher training in Sweden's fifth largest city. The city has about 150 000 inhabitants and about 50 schools with about 14 000 students in primary education. The project has been carried out in close cooperation with the municipality.

The work started in the fall of 2014 with a pilot study with 10 teachers in different subjects that was carried out during spring 2015. The pilot study was successful as the teachers were able to introduce activities related to programming and computational thinking in their subjects after only two half day workshops. The next step was to scale this up to include all the schools in the city. As expected, this turned out to be a larger challenge. More than 70 teachers were involved in the second part of the project. Some of the lessons learned are that it is quite easy to provide teacher training, but harder to get teachers to actually change their teaching and even more challenging to get teachers to help their colleagues introduce programming or computational thinking in their teaching.

Based on our experience we draw some general conclusions and make suggestions for how to scale up the teaching of programming and computational thinking to all.

References

  1. A. Balanskat and K. Engelhardt. Computing our future. computer programming and coding. priorities, school curricula and initiatives across europe, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. Bell, I. H. Witten, and M. Fellows. CS Unplugged -- An enrichment and extension programme for primary-aged students. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Department for Education. National curriculum in England: Computing programmes of study, 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Digitaliseringskommissionen. En digital agenda i m"anniskans tj"anst : en ljusnande framtid kan bli vår : delbet"ankande. Technical Report SOU 2014:13, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Finnish National Board of Education. Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2014, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. F. Heintz, L. Mannila, and T. F"arnqvist. A review of models for introducing computational thinking, computer science and computing in k-12 education. In Proc. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. F. Heintz, L. Mannila, L.-Å. Nordén, P. Parnes, and B. Regnell. Introducing programming and digital competence in swedish k--9 education. In Proc. ISSEP, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. F. Heintz, L. Mannila, K. Nygårds, P. Parnes, and B. Regnell. Computing at school in sweden -- experiences from introducing computer science within existing subjects. In Proc. ISSEP, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Informatics Europe and ACM Europe. Informatics in education: Europe cannot afford to miss the boat, 2015. Report of the joint Informatics Europe and ACM Europe Working Group on Informatics Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. L. Rolandsson and I.-B. Skogh. Programming in school: Look back to move forward. Trans. Comput. Educ., 2(14):12:1--12:25, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Skolverket. Få syn på digitaliseringen på grundskolnivå, June 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Stephanie Carretero Gomez and Riina Vuorikari and Yves Punie. DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. White House. Computer science for all, 2016. https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Wing. Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3):33--35, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Computational Thinking for All: An Experience Report on Scaling up Teaching Computational Thinking to All Students in a Major City in Sweden

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
        February 2018
        1174 pages
        ISBN:9781450351034
        DOI:10.1145/3159450

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 February 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGCSE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate161of459submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader