skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173990acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Modern Bereavement: A Model for Complicated Grief in the Digital Age

Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The experience of grief and death is an inevitable part of life. Grief, a natural response to death, can be a challenging and emotionally taxing journey. Bereaved individuals often feel lost in a fog, unaware of resources available to them and unsure of which resources could be useful for supporting their healing process. Complicated grief, a more intense form of grief that extends beyond six months following the death of a loved one, presents both a unique challenge and a design opportunity for the HCI community. In this work, we present the results of a survey and interview study on the technological practices of complicated grievers. Based on themes found in the data, we propose a new model for complicated grief in the digital age, consisting of the following phases: Fog, Isolation, Exploration, Immersion, and Stabilization. We then present a set of design considerations for designers seeking to create tools for complicated grievers navigating their unique grief journeys.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn3490.mp4

mp4

203.8 MB

References

  1. Arnold, J., and Gemma, P. B. The Continuing Process of Parental Grief. Death Studies 32, 7 (2008), 658--673.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Beyond Indigo Forums. Online Grief Support, Help for Coping with Loss - Beyond Indigo Forums. http://forums.grieving.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonanno, G. A., Wortman, C. B., Lehman, D. R., Tweed, R. G., Haring, M., Sonnega, J., Carr, D., and Nesse, R. M. Resilience to loss and chronic grief: a prospective study from preloss to 18-months postloss. Journal of personality and social psychology 83, 5 (2002), 1150--1164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brubaker, J. R., and Callison-Burch, V. Legacy contact: Designing and implementing post-mortem stewardship at facebook. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '16, ACM (2016), 2908--2919. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brubaker, J. R., and Hayes, G. R. We will never forget you {online}: An Empirical Investigation of Post-mortem MySpace Comments. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '11, ACM (2011), 123--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brubaker, J. R., Hayes, G. R., and Dourish, P. Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a Site for the Expansion of Death and Mourning. The Information Society 29, 3 (2013), 152--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Burke, M., and Kraut, R. E. The Relationship between Facebook Use and Well-Being depends on Communication Type and Tie Strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21, 4 (2016), 265--281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Corbin, J., and Strauss, A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cvinar, J. G. Do suicide survivors suffer social stigma: A review of the literature. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 41, 1 (2005), 14--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Doka, K. J., and Martin, T. L. Grieving beyond gender: understanding the ways men and women mourn. Routledge, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dominick, S. A., Irvine, A. B., Beauchamp, N., Seeley, J. R., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Doka, K. J., and Bonanno, G. A. An internet tool to normalize grief. OMEGA Journal of Death and Dying 60, 1 (2010), 71--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Douglas, M. Randy pausch, 47, dies; his last lecture inspired many to live with wonder. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/26/us/26pausch. html?mcubz=0", July 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dume, G. Exploring bereavement in albanian college students. Master's thesis, Ball State University, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Foong, P. S., and Kera, D. Applying reflective design to digital memorials. SIMTech'08 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Futterman, A., Holland, J. M., Brown, P. J., Thompson, L. W., and Gallagher-Thompson, D. Factorial validity of the texas revised inventory of grief-present scale among bereaved older adults. Psychological Assessment 22, 3 (2010), 675--687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gillies, J., and Neimeyer, R. A. Loss, Grief, and the Search for Significance: Toward a Model of Meaning Reconstruction in Bereavement. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 19 (2006), 31--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Grief In Common. http://www.griefincommon.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Horowitz, M. J. Psychodynamics and Cognition. University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kochanek, M.A., K. D., Murphy, B.S., S. L., Xu, M.D., J., and Tejada-Vera, M.S., B. Deaths : Final Data for 2014. National Vital Statistics Reports 65, 4 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., and Williams, J. B. W. The PHQ-9 Validity of a Brief Depression Severity Measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16, 9 (2001), 606--613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kubler-Ross, E. On Death Dying: What the Dying Have to Teach Doctors, Nurses, Clergy Their Own Families. The Macmillan Company, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Massimi, M. Exploring remembrance and social support behavior in an online bereavement support group. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '13, ACM (2013), 1169--1180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Massimi, M., and Baecker, R. M. A Death in the Family: Opportunities for Designing Technologies for the Bereaved. In Proceedings of the 2010 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2010), 1821--1830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Massimi, M., and Baecker, R. M. Dealing with Death in Design: Developing Systems for the Bereaved. In Proceedings of the 2011 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2011), 1001--1010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Moncur, W., Bikker, J., Kasket, E., and Troyer, J. From Death to Final Disposition: Roles of Technology in the Post-Mortem Interval. Proceedings of the 2012 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Moncur, W., Julius, M., Van Den Hoven, E., and Kirk, D. Story Shell: the participatory design of a bespoke digital memorial. Participatory Innovation Conference 2015 (2015), 470--477.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Moncur, W., and Kirk, D. An emergent framework for digital memorials. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS '14, ACM (2014), 965--974. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Moules, N. J., Simonson, K., Fleiszer, A. R., Prins, M., and Glasgow, B. The Soul of Sorrow Work: Grief and Therapeutic Interventions with Families. Journal of Family Nursing 13, 1 (2007), 117--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Neimeyer, R. A. The language of loss: Grief therapy as a process of meaning reconstruction. In Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 2001, 261--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Odom, W., Harper, R., Sellen, A., Kirk, D., and Banks, R. Passing on & putting to rest: Understanding bereavement in the context of interactive technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '10, ACM (2010), 1831--1840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. OFFTIME. ( OFFTIME ) -- Focus Digital Balance. http://offtime.co/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Prigerson, H. G., Horowitz, M. J., Jacobs, S. C., Parkes, C. M., Aslan, M., Goodkin, K., Raphael, B., Marwit, S. J., Wortman, C., Neimeyer, R. A., Bonanno, G., Block, S. D., Kissane, D., Boelen, P., Maercker, A., and Maciejewski, P. K. Prolonged Grief Disorder: Psychometric Validation of Criteria Proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Med 6, 8 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Prigerson, H. G., Maciejewski, P. K., Reynolds, C. F., Bierhals, A. J., Newsom, J. T., Fasiczka, A., Frank, E., Doman, J., and Miller, M. Inventory of complicated grief: A scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Research 59, 1 (1995), 65 -- 79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Rando, T. A. Treatment of Complicated Mourning. Research Press, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Robinson, E., M., Riley, J., D. Myers, C., Sadler, I., Kvaal, S., Geisser, M., and Keefe, F. The coping strategies questionnaire: A large sample, item level factor analysis. The Clinical Journal of Pain 13, 1 (04 1997), 43--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Sandberg, S., and Grant, A. Option B: Facing Adversity, Building Resilience, and Finding Joy. Alfred A. Knopf, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Stanford News. Text of Steve Jobs' Commencement address (2005). http: //news.stanford.edu/2005/06/14/jobs-061505/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Strobe, M., and Schut, H. The dual-process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies 23 (1999), 197--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Stroebe, M. S., Hansson, R. O., Schut, H., and Stroebe, W., Eds. Handbook of bereavement research and practice: advances in theory and intervention. American Psychological Association, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Swartwood, R. M., Veach, P. M., Kuhne, J., Lee, H. K., and Ji, K. Surviving grief: An analysis of the exchange of hope in online grief communities. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying 63, 2 (2011), 161--181. PMID: 21842664.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Modern Bereavement: A Model for Complicated Grief in the Digital Age

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader